• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症患者的互动和共同基础:在居住型痴呆症护理环境中跨越语言和文化多样性的交流。

Interaction and common ground in dementia: Communication across linguistic and cultural diversity in a residential dementia care setting.

机构信息

Linköping University, Sweden.

出版信息

Health (London). 2017 Sep;21(5):538-554. doi: 10.1177/1363459316677626. Epub 2016 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1177/1363459316677626
PMID:27895101
Abstract

Previous research concerning bilingual people with a dementia disease has mainly focused on the importance of sharing a spoken language with caregivers. While acknowledging this, this article addresses the multidimensional character of communication and interaction. As using spoken language is made difficult as a consequence of the dementia disease, this multidimensionality becomes particularly important. The article is based on a qualitative analysis of ethnographic fieldwork at a dementia care facility. It presents ethnographic examples of different communicative forms, with particular focus on bilingual interactions. Interaction is understood as a collective and collaborative activity. The text finds that a shared spoken language is advantageous, but is not the only source of, nor a guarantee for, creating common ground and understanding. Communicative resources other than spoken language are for example body language, embodiment, artefacts and time. Furthermore, forms of communication are not static but develop, change and are created over time. Ability to communicate is thus not something that one has or has not, but is situationally and collaboratively created. To facilitate this, time and familiarity are central resources, and the results indicate the importance of continuity in interpersonal relations.

摘要

先前有关痴呆症双语人群的研究主要集中于与照护者共享口语的重要性。虽然承认这一点,但本文涉及到沟通和互动的多维性。由于痴呆症导致口语使用变得困难,因此这种多维性变得尤为重要。本文基于对痴呆症护理机构进行的民族志实地调查的定性分析。它展示了不同交际形式的民族志例子,特别关注双语互动。互动被理解为一种集体和协作的活动。文本发现,共享口语是有益的,但不是创造共同点和理解的唯一来源,也不是保证。口语以外的交际资源例如肢体语言、体现、物品和时间。此外,交际形式不是静态的,而是随着时间的推移而发展、变化和创造。因此,交际能力不是一个人有或没有的东西,而是根据情况和协作创造的。为了促进这一点,时间和熟悉程度是核心资源,研究结果表明人际关系连续性的重要性。

相似文献

1
Interaction and common ground in dementia: Communication across linguistic and cultural diversity in a residential dementia care setting.痴呆症患者的互动和共同基础:在居住型痴呆症护理环境中跨越语言和文化多样性的交流。
Health (London). 2017 Sep;21(5):538-554. doi: 10.1177/1363459316677626. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
2
How to adapt caring services to migration-driven diversity? A qualitative study exploring challenges and possible adjustments in the care of people living with dementia.如何使关爱服务适应移民驱动的多元化?一项探索在照顾痴呆症患者方面面临的挑战和可能的调整的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 22;15(12):e0243803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243803. eCollection 2020.
3
Language and Culture in the Caregiving of People with Dementia in Care Homes - What Are the Implications for Well-Being? A Scoping Review with a Welsh Perspective.养老院中痴呆症患者照护中的语言与文化——对幸福感有何影响?一项威尔士视角的范围综述
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2019 Mar;34(1):67-114. doi: 10.1007/s10823-018-9361-9.
4
Improving Communication between Persons with Mild Dementia and Their Caregivers: Qualitative Analysis of a Practice-Based Logopaedic Intervention.改善轻度痴呆患者与其照顾者之间的沟通:基于实践的言语治疗干预的定性分析
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2018;70(3-4):124-133. doi: 10.1159/000491081. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
5
Participatory arts programs in residential dementia care: Playing with language differences.寄宿制痴呆症护理中的参与性艺术项目:应对语言差异
Dementia (London). 2018 Aug;17(6):763-774. doi: 10.1177/1471301217729985. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Conceptualizing attunement in dementia care: a meta-ethnographic review.痴呆症护理中协调感的概念化:一项元民族志综述。
Arts Health. 2022 Feb;14(1):32-48. doi: 10.1080/17533015.2020.1827276. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
Discourses of dementia: a call for an ethnographic, action research approach to care in linguistically and culturally diverse environments.痴呆症的论述:呼吁在语言和文化多元的环境中采用民族志行动研究方法进行护理。
Semin Speech Lang. 2009 Aug;30(3):198-206. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1225956. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
8
Staging casual conversations for people with dementia.为患有痴呆症的人安排日常对话。
Dementia (London). 2014 Nov;13(6):834-53. doi: 10.1177/1471301213488609. Epub 2013 May 22.
9
Response practices in multilingual interaction with an older Persian woman in a Swedish residential home.在瑞典一家养老院与一位年长的波斯女性进行多语言互动时的回应方式。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2014 Mar;29(1):1-23. doi: 10.1007/s10823-013-9217-2.
10
Intensive Interaction and discourses of personhood: A focus group study with dementia caregivers.强化互动与人的身份认同话语:一项针对痴呆症照料者的焦点小组研究。
Dementia (London). 2020 Aug;19(6):2018-2037. doi: 10.1177/1471301218814389. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Influencing Communication for Older Adults in Residential and Community Aged Care: A Scoping Review.影响老年人在住宿和社区老年护理中沟通的因素:一项范围综述
Gerontologist. 2025 Jun 12;65(7). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf140.
2
Comparison of neuro-psychiatric disorders between older adults living in foster families or nursing homes.寄养家庭或养老院中老年人神经精神障碍的比较。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 6;15(1):7918. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92962-1.
3
Building evidence to advance health equity: a systematic review on care-related outcomes for older, minoritised populations in long-term care homes.
构建循证以促进健康公平:长期护理院中老年少数族裔人群相关护理结局的系统评价。
Age Ageing. 2024 Apr 1;53(4). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae059.
4
Caring Self-Efficacy of Personal Care Attendants From English-Speaking and Non-English-Speaking Countries Working in Australian Residential Aged Care Settings.照顾自我效能感:在澳大利亚养老院工作的讲英语和非英语国家的个人护理员。
J Aging Health. 2024 Mar;36(3-4):207-219. doi: 10.1177/08982643231183466. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
5
Keeping the conversation going: How progressivity is prioritised in co-remembering talk between couples impacted by dementia.保持对话进行:在记忆受痴呆影响的夫妻之间的谈话时,如何优先考虑累进性。
Health (London). 2024 Mar;28(2):272-289. doi: 10.1177/13634593221127822. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
6
Combining ethnography and conversation analysis to explore interaction in dementia care settings.结合民族志和会话分析探讨痴呆症护理环境中的互动。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2306-2313. doi: 10.1111/hex.13563. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
7
Investigating the effects of impairment in non-verbal communication on neuropsychiatric symptoms and quality of life of people living with dementia.调查非言语沟通障碍对痴呆症患者神经精神症状和生活质量的影响。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021 May 1;7(1):e12172. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12172. eCollection 2021.
8
How to adapt caring services to migration-driven diversity? A qualitative study exploring challenges and possible adjustments in the care of people living with dementia.如何使关爱服务适应移民驱动的多元化?一项探索在照顾痴呆症患者方面面临的挑战和可能的调整的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 22;15(12):e0243803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243803. eCollection 2020.
9
Understanding Interactions Between Caregivers and Care Recipients in Person-Centered Dementia Care: A Rapid Review.理解以患者为中心的痴呆症护理中护理人员与护理接受者之间的相互作用:快速综述。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Sep 14;15:1637-1647. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S255454. eCollection 2020.
10
Comparing proxy rated quality of life of people living with dementia in care homes.比较养老院中痴呆症患者的代理评定生活质量。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jan;50(1):86-95. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718003987. Epub 2019 Jan 29.