Suppr超能文献

外周动脉疾病中振荡式踝臂指数的诊断准确性研究:振荡式误差和腿部钙化的影响

Diagnostic Accuracy Study of an Oscillometric Ankle-Brachial Index in Peripheral Arterial Disease: The Influence of Oscillometric Errors and Calcified Legs.

作者信息

Herráiz-Adillo Ángel, Martínez-Vizcaíno Vicente, Cavero-Redondo Iván, Álvarez-Bueno Celia, Garrido-Miguel Miriam, Notario-Pacheco Blanca

机构信息

Department of Primary Care, Health Service of Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM), Tragacete, Cuenca, Spain.

Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. Health and Social Research Center. Cuenca, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Nov 29;11(11):e0167408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167408. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an indicator of widespread atherosclerosis. However, most individuals with PAD, in spite of being at high cardiovascular risk, are asymptomatic. This fact, together with the limitations of the Doppler ankle-brachial index (ABI), contributes to PAD underdiagnose. The aim of this study was to compare oscillometric ABI and Doppler ABI to diagnose peripheral arterial disease, and also to examine the influence of oscillometric errors and calcified legs on the PAD diagnoses.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We measured the ankle-brachial indexes of 90 volunteers (n = 180 legs, age 70 ± 14 years, 43% diabetics) using both oscillometer OMRON-M3 and Doppler. For concordance analyses we used the Bland and Altman method, and also estimated the intraclass correlation coefficient. Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves were used to examine the diagnostic performance of both methods. The ABI means were 1.06 ± 0.14 and 1.04 ± 0.16 (p = 0.034) measured by oscillometer and Doppler ABIs respectively, with limits of agreement of ± 0.20 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.769. Oscillometer yielded 23 "error" measurements, and also overestimated the measurements in low ankle pressures. Using Doppler as gold standard, oscillometer performance for diagnosis of PAD showed an Area Under Curve = 0.944 (sensitivity: 66.7%, specificity: 96.8%). Moreover, when considered calcified legs and oscillometric "error" readings as arteriopathy equivalents, sensitivity rose to 78.2%, maintaining specificity in 96%. The best oscillometer cut-off point was 0.96 (sensitivity: 87%, specificity: 91%, positive likelihood ratio: 9.66 and negative likelihood ratio: 0.14).

CONCLUSION

Despite its limitations, oscillometric ABI could be a useful tool for the diagnosis of PAD, particularly when considering calcified legs and oscillometric "errors" readings as peripheral arterial disease equivalents.

摘要

背景

外周动脉疾病(PAD)是广泛动脉粥样硬化的一个指标。然而,大多数PAD患者尽管心血管风险很高,但并无症状。这一事实,再加上多普勒踝臂指数(ABI)的局限性,导致PAD诊断不足。本研究的目的是比较示波法ABI和多普勒ABI在诊断外周动脉疾病方面的差异,并研究示波误差和腿部钙化对PAD诊断的影响。

方法与结果

我们使用欧姆龙M3示波仪和多普勒仪测量了90名志愿者(n = 180条腿,年龄70±14岁,43%为糖尿病患者)的踝臂指数。对于一致性分析,我们使用了布兰德和奥特曼方法,并估计了组内相关系数。使用受试者工作特征曲线来检验两种方法的诊断性能。示波法和多普勒法测得的ABI均值分别为1.06±0.14和1.04±0.16(p = 0.034),一致性界限为±0.20,组内相关系数 = 0.769。示波仪产生了23次“误差”测量,并且在低踝压时高估了测量值。以多普勒法为金标准,示波仪诊断PAD的曲线下面积 = 0.944(敏感性:66.7%,特异性:96.8%)。此外,当将钙化腿和示波“误差”读数视为动脉病变等效情况时,敏感性升至78.2%,特异性保持在96%。示波仪的最佳截断点为0.96(敏感性:87%,特异性:91%,阳性似然比:9.66,阴性似然比:0.14)。

结论

尽管存在局限性,但示波法ABI可能是诊断PAD的有用工具,特别是当将钙化腿和示波“误差”读数视为外周动脉疾病等效情况时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efdb/5127576/1cf378834028/pone.0167408.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验