Suppr超能文献

利用示波法血压计自动测定踝臂指数:与多普勒测量法和心血管危险因素分析的对比验证。

Automated determination of the ankle-brachial index using an oscillometric blood pressure monitor: validation vs. Doppler measurement and cardiovascular risk factor profile.

机构信息

Hypertension Center, Third University Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2011 Jul;34(7):825-30. doi: 10.1038/hr.2011.53. Epub 2011 May 19.

Abstract

The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a method used widely for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) diagnosis and cardiovascular risk prediction. This study validated automated ABI measurements taken using an oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitor allowing simultaneous arm-leg BP measurements. A total of 93 patients (hypertension 83%; dyslipidemia 72%; diabetes 45%; cardiovascular disease 23%; smoking 15%) were submitted to Doppler and automated ABI measurements, performed using a professional oscillometric BP monitor (Microlife WatchBP Office; triplicate simultaneous arm-leg BP measurements), in a randomized order. The mean difference between the Doppler reading (1.08 ± 0.17) and (1) the first oscillometric ABI reading was 0.03 ± 0.11, (2) the average of two oscillometric readings was 0.02 ± 0.10 and (3) the average of three oscillometric readings was 0.02 ± 0.09 (P < 0.01 for all). Strong correlations were found between oscillometric and Doppler ABI (r 0.80, 0.85 and 0.86 for single and average of two and three oscillometric readings, respectively; P < 0.001 for all). Agreement between oscillometric and Doppler ABI in diagnosing PAD (Doppler ABI < 0.9) was found in 95% of cases (κ 0.79; agreement in diabetics: 94%, κ 0.79). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve revealed area under the curve at 0.98, with a 0.97 oscillometric ABI cutoff for optimal sensitivity (92%) and specificity (92%) in diagnosing PAD. Average time for automated ABI measurement was 5.8 vs. 9.3 min for Doppler (P < 0.001). Doppler and oscillometric ABI were associated and predicted (multivariate regression analysis) by the same cardiovascular risk factors (pulse pressure, smoking and cardiovascular disease history). Automated ABI measurement using a professional BP monitor allowing simultaneous arm-leg BP measurements appears to be a reliable and faster alternative to Doppler measurement.

摘要

踝臂指数(ABI)是一种广泛用于外周动脉疾病(PAD)诊断和心血管风险预测的方法。本研究验证了一种使用振荡血压(BP)监测仪进行自动 ABI 测量的方法,该监测仪允许同时进行手臂-腿部 BP 测量。共有 93 名患者(高血压 83%;血脂异常 72%;糖尿病 45%;心血管疾病 23%;吸烟 15%)接受了多普勒和自动 ABI 测量,使用专业的振荡血压监测仪(Microlife WatchBP Office;三次同时手臂-腿部 BP 测量)以随机顺序进行。多普勒读数(1.08±0.17)与(1)第一个振荡 ABI 读数之间的平均差异为 0.03±0.11,(2)两个振荡读数的平均值为 0.02±0.10,(3)三个振荡读数的平均值为 0.02±0.09(所有 P<0.01)。在振荡和多普勒 ABI 之间发现了很强的相关性(单测和两次及三次平均振荡读数的 r 值分别为 0.80、0.85 和 0.86;所有 P<0.001)。在诊断 PAD 时,振荡和多普勒 ABI 的一致性为 95%(95%置信区间[CI]:0.79~0.99;糖尿病患者的一致性为 94%,κ 值为 0.79)。接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线显示曲线下面积为 0.98,0.97 的振荡 ABI 截断值具有最佳的敏感性(92%)和特异性(92%),用于诊断 PAD。自动 ABI 测量的平均时间为 5.8 分钟,而多普勒测量为 9.3 分钟(P<0.001)。多普勒和振荡 ABI 相关,并由相同的心血管危险因素(脉压、吸烟和心血管疾病史)预测(多变量回归分析)。使用允许同时进行手臂-腿部 BP 测量的专业 BP 监测仪进行自动 ABI 测量似乎是一种可靠且更快的多普勒测量替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验