• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个用于实验生物医学的实验室重大事件和错误报告系统。

A Laboratory Critical Incident and Error Reporting System for Experimental Biomedicine.

作者信息

Dirnagl Ulrich, Przesdzing Ingo, Kurreck Claudia, Major Sebastian

机构信息

Department of Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS Biol. 2016 Dec 1;14(12):e2000705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000705. eCollection 2016 Dec.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.2000705
PMID:27906976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5131907/
Abstract

We here propose the implementation of a simple and effective method to enhance the quality of basic and preclinical academic research: critical incident reporting (CIR). CIR has become a standard in clinical medicine but to our knowledge has never been implemented in the context of academic basic research. We provide a simple, free, open-source software tool for implementing a CIR system in research groups, laboratories, or large institutions (LabCIRS). LabCIRS was developed, tested, and implemented in our multidisciplinary and multiprofessional neuroscience research department. It is accepted by all members of the department, has led to the emergence of a mature error culture, and has made the laboratory a safer and more communicative environment. Initial concerns that implementation of such a measure might lead to a "surveillance culture" that would stifle scientific creativity turned out to be unfounded.

摘要

我们在此提议实施一种简单有效的方法来提高基础和临床前学术研究的质量

关键事件报告(CIR)。CIR已成为临床医学的标准,但据我们所知,从未在学术基础研究中实施过。我们提供了一个简单、免费、开源的软件工具,用于在研究小组、实验室或大型机构中实施CIR系统(实验室CIR)。实验室CIR是在我们多学科、多专业的神经科学研究部门开发、测试和实施的。它被该部门的所有成员所接受,催生了一种成熟的错误文化,并使实验室成为一个更安全、更具沟通性的环境。最初担心实施这样的措施可能会导致一种“监督文化”,从而扼杀科学创造力,结果证明是没有根据的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d350/5131907/f374657cc134/pbio.2000705.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d350/5131907/ea1d9541ab01/pbio.2000705.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d350/5131907/c4f6a8c5a9c9/pbio.2000705.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d350/5131907/f374657cc134/pbio.2000705.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d350/5131907/ea1d9541ab01/pbio.2000705.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d350/5131907/c4f6a8c5a9c9/pbio.2000705.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d350/5131907/f374657cc134/pbio.2000705.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Laboratory Critical Incident and Error Reporting System for Experimental Biomedicine.一个用于实验生物医学的实验室重大事件和错误报告系统。
PLoS Biol. 2016 Dec 1;14(12):e2000705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000705. eCollection 2016 Dec.
2
Implementation of automated reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate among Veterans Affairs laboratories: a retrospective study.退伍军人事务部实验室估算肾小球滤过率自动报告的实施:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jul 12;12:69. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-69.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Enhancing Safety Culture Through Improved Incident Reporting: A Case Study In Translational Research.通过改进事件报告提高安全文化:转化研究案例。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1797-1804. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0706.
5
Critical incident reporting systems.重大事件报告系统。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005 Feb;10(1):31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2004.09.012.
6
Incident learning in pursuit of high reliability: implementing a comprehensive, low-threshold reporting program in a large, multisite radiation oncology department.追求高可靠性的事件学习:在一个大型多机构放射肿瘤学部门实施全面、低门槛的报告程序。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Apr;41(4):160-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41021-9.
7
Rates and reasons for safety incident reporting in the medical imaging department of a large academic health sciences centre.大型学术健康科学中心医学影像部门安全事件报告率及原因。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2021 Mar;52(1):86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.11.018. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
8
Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department.英国一家急诊科的事件报告。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.001.
9
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
10
Organizational culture, continuous quality improvement, and medication administration error reporting.组织文化、持续质量改进与用药差错报告
Am J Med Qual. 2001 Jul-Aug;16(4):128-34. doi: 10.1177/106286060101600404.

引用本文的文献

1
From Methods to Monographs: Fostering a Culture of Research Quality.从方法到专著:培育研究质量文化。
eNeuro. 2023 Aug 8;10(8). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0247-23.2023. Print 2023 Aug.
2
CIRS-LAS - a novel approach to increase transparency in laboratory animal science for improving animal welfare by reducing laboratory animal distress.CIRS-LAS——一种通过减少实验动物痛苦来提高实验动物科学透明度以改善动物福利的新方法。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Jun 21;10:1155249. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1155249. eCollection 2023.
3
Digital Management Systems in Academic Health Sciences Laboratories: A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Never Waste a Good Crisis: Confronting Reproducibility in Translational Research.绝不要浪费一个好危机:直面转化研究中的可重复性问题。
Cell Metab. 2016 Sep 13;24(3):348-360. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.006.
2
Failed trials for central nervous system disorders do not necessarily invalidate preclinical models and drug targets.针对中枢神经系统疾病的试验失败并不一定意味着临床前模型和药物靶点无效。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016 Jul;15(7):516. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.88. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
3
What does research reproducibility mean?研究的可重复性是什么意思?
学术健康科学实验室中的数字管理系统:一项范围综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jun 16;9(6):739. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060739.
4
Development and Application of Computerized Risk Registry and Management Tool Based on FMEA and FRACAS for Total Testing Process.基于 FMEA 和 FRACAS 的总测试过程计算机化风险登记册和管理工具的开发和应用。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 11;57(5):477. doi: 10.3390/medicina57050477.
5
Improving quality of preclinical academic research through auditing: A feasibility study.通过审核提高临床前学术研究质量:一项可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240719. eCollection 2020.
6
Improving the trustworthiness, usefulness, and ethics of biomedical research through an innovative and comprehensive institutional initiative.通过创新和全面的机构举措,提高生物医学研究的可信度、有用性和伦理性。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Feb 11;18(2):e3000576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000576. eCollection 2020 Feb.
7
Four erroneous beliefs thwarting more trustworthy research.阻碍更可信研究的四个错误观念。
Elife. 2019 Jul 29;8:e45261. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45261.
8
Development and implementation of evidence-based laboratory safety management tools for a public health laboratory.为公共卫生实验室开发和实施基于证据的实验室安全管理工具。
Saf Sci. 2019 Aug;117:205-216. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.003.
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jun 1;8(341):341ps12. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027.
4
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.1500名科学家揭开了可重复性的盖子。
Nature. 2016 May 26;533(7604):452-4. doi: 10.1038/533452a.
5
Irreproducibility in Preclinical Biomedical Research: Perceptions, Uncertainties, and Knowledge Gaps.临床前生物医学研究的不可重复性:认知、不确定性和知识空白。
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2016 Apr;37(4):290-302. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
6
Reproducibility crisis: Blame it on the antibodies.可重复性危机:归咎于抗体。
Nature. 2015 May 21;521(7552):274-6. doi: 10.1038/521274a.
7
Quality assurance mechanisms for the unregulated research environment.无监管研究环境的质量保证机制。
Trends Biotechnol. 2013 Oct;31(10):552-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.06.007.
8
Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research.改进生物科学研究报告:动物研究报告的ARRIVE指南
PLoS Biol. 2010 Jun 29;8(6):e1000412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412.
9
National critical incident reporting: improving patient safety.国家重大事件报告:改善患者安全。
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Nov;103(5):623-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep273.
10
Improving outcome after stroke: overcoming the translational roadblock.改善卒中预后:克服转化障碍。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(3):268-78. doi: 10.1159/000118039. Epub 2008 Feb 22.