• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

From Methods to Monographs: Fostering a Culture of Research Quality.

作者信息

Crawford Devon C, Hoye Mariah L, Silberberg Shai D

机构信息

Office of Research Quality, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892

Office of Research Quality, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

出版信息

eNeuro. 2023 Aug 8;10(8). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0247-23.2023. Print 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0247-23.2023
PMID:37553250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10411680/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3c/10411680/a2b9a8200058/ENEURO.0247-23.2023_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3c/10411680/f626b3ca6ad6/ENEURO.0247-23.2023_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3c/10411680/a2b9a8200058/ENEURO.0247-23.2023_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3c/10411680/f626b3ca6ad6/ENEURO.0247-23.2023_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3c/10411680/a2b9a8200058/ENEURO.0247-23.2023_f002.jpg

相似文献

1
From Methods to Monographs: Fostering a Culture of Research Quality.从方法到专著：培育研究质量文化。
eNeuro. 2023 Aug 8;10(8). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0247-23.2023. Print 2023 Aug.
2
The vital few meet the trivial many: unexpected use patterns in a monographs collection.关键的少数满足琐碎的多数：专著馆藏中的意外使用模式。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1998 Oct;86(4):496-503.
3
Pediatric drug data in Canadian drug monographs: a descriptive analysis.加拿大药品说明书中的儿科用药数据：描述性分析
CMAJ Open. 2020 Aug 31;8(3):E522-E529. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200010. Print 2020 Jul-Sep.
4
A formal system of approval for monographs in the pharmacopoeia of culture media--statement from the IUMS-ICFMH working party on culture media.培养基药典专论的正式批准系统——国际微生物学会联盟-国际临床真菌学与医学真菌学联合会培养基工作组声明
Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 Nov 24;45(1):59-63. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00140-8.
5
Problem-oriented drug monographs developed for physicians in Northern Ireland.为北爱尔兰的医生编写的面向问题的药物专论。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 Feb;43(2):360-7.
6
Salty broth for salicylate poisoning? Adequacy of overdose management advice in the 2001 Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties.用含盐肉汤治疗水杨酸盐中毒？2001年《药品及特殊用品手册》中过量用药管理建议是否充分？
CMAJ. 2002 Oct 29;167(9):992-6.
7
Documentation of pediatric drug safety in manufacturers' product monographs: a cross-sectional evaluation of the canadian compendium of pharmaceuticals and specialities.制造商产品说明书中儿科药物安全性的记录：对《加拿大药品和特殊产品汇编》的横断面评估
Paediatr Drugs. 2008;10(3):193-7. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200810030-00007.
8
Is Real-World Evidence Used in P&T Monographs and Therapeutic Class Reviews?真实世界证据是否用于 P&T 专论和治疗类别审查？
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jun;23(6):613-620. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.16368. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
9
Is Real-World Evidence Used in P&T Monographs and Therapeutic Class Reviews?是否在药品评审和支付管理专论及治疗类别审查中使用真实世界证据？
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Dec;26(12):1604-1611. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.12.1604.
10
[Cannabis for medicinal use: development of pharmacopoeia monographs as a quality standard].[药用大麻：作为质量标准的药典专论的制定]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Jul;62(7):806-810. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-02963-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences.被引频次和期刊影响因子并不能体现行为科学和脑科学领域某些研究质量指标。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Aug 17;9(8):220334. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220334. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Quality.采用严谨透明指数建立机构评分：科学报告质量的大规模分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 27;24(6):e37324. doi: 10.2196/37324.
3
Reforms to improve reproducibility and quality must be coordinated across the research ecosystem: the view from the UKRN Local Network Leads.
为了提高可重复性和质量，必须协调整个研究生态系统的改革：来自 UKRN 地方网络负责人的观点。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Feb 15;15(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-05949-w.
4
Did a change in Nature journals' editorial policy for life sciences research improve reporting?《自然》杂志生命科学研究编辑政策的改变是否改善了报告情况？
BMJ Open Sci. 2019 Feb 26;3(1):e000035. doi: 10.1136/bmjos-2017-000035. eCollection 2019.
5
The past, present and future of Registered Reports.注册报告的过去、现在与未来。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Jan;6(1):29-42. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01193-7. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
6
Introduction to the EQIPD quality system.EQIPD 质量体系简介。
Elife. 2021 May 24;10:e63294. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63294.
7
The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods.用于评估生物医学科学方法的严谨性与透明度指数质量指标
iScience. 2020 Oct 20;23(11):101698. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101698. eCollection 2020 Nov 20.
8
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity.《评估研究人员的香港原则：促进研究诚信》
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 16;18(7):e3000737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research.ARRIVE 指南 2.0：报告动物研究的更新指南。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 14;18(7):e3000410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities.生物医学科学教师晋升和终身教职的学术标准：对国际大学样本的横断面分析。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 25;369:m2081. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2081.