Suppr超能文献

一项随机对照试验性研究,旨在探究胸段硬膜外阻滞和椎旁阻滞在减轻开胸术后慢性疼痛方面的有效性:TOPIC可行性研究方案。

Randomised controlled pilot study to investigate the effectiveness of thoracic epidural and paravertebral blockade in reducing chronic post-thoracotomy pain: TOPIC feasibility study protocol.

作者信息

Yeung Joyce, Melody Teresa, Kerr Amy, Naidu Babu, Middleton Lee, Tryposkiadis Kostas, Daniels Jane, Gao Fang

机构信息

Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Academic Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care, Pain and Resuscitation, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 1;6(12):e012735. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012735.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Open chest surgery (thoracotomy) is considered the most painful of surgical procedures. Forceful wound retraction, costochondral dislocation, posterior costovertebral ligament disruption, intercostal nerve trauma and wound movement during respiration combine to produce an acute, severe postoperative pain insult and persistent chronic pain many months after surgery is common. Three recent systematic reviews conclude that unilateral continuous paravertebral blockade (PVB) provides analgesia at least equivalent to thoracic epidural blockade (TEB) in the postoperative period, has a lower failure rate, and symptom relief that lasted months. Crucially, PVB may reduce the development of subsequent chronic pain by intercostal nerve protection or decreased nociceptive input. The overall aim is to determine in patients who undergo thoracotomy whether perioperative PVB results in reducing chronic post-thoracotomy pain (CPTP) compared with TEB. This pilot study will evaluate feasibility of a substantive trial.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

TOPIC is a randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of TEB and PVB in reducing CPTP. This is a pilot study to evaluate feasibility of a substantive trial and study processes in 2 adult thoracic centres, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (HEFT) and University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust (UHSM). The primary objective is to establish the number of patients randomised as a proportion of those eligible. Secondary objectives include evaluation of study processes. Analyses of feasibility and patient-reported outcomes will primarily take the form of simple descriptive statistics and where appropriate, point estimates of effects sizes and associated 95% CIs.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has obtained ethical approval from NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC number 14/EM/1280). Dissemination plan includes: informing patients and health professionals; engaging multidisciplinary professionals to support a proposal of a definitive trial and submission for a full HTA application dependent on the success of the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN45041624; Pre-results.

摘要

引言

开胸手术(胸廓切开术)被认为是外科手术中最疼痛的手术。强力的伤口牵拉、肋软骨脱位、后肋椎韧带断裂、肋间神经损伤以及呼吸时伤口的移动共同导致术后急性、严重的疼痛刺激,术后数月持续存在慢性疼痛很常见。最近的三项系统评价得出结论,单侧连续椎旁阻滞(PVB)在术后提供的镇痛效果至少与胸段硬膜外阻滞(TEB)相当,失败率更低,且症状缓解可持续数月。至关重要的是,PVB可能通过保护肋间神经或减少伤害性输入来降低后续慢性疼痛的发生。总体目标是确定在接受胸廓切开术的患者中,围手术期PVB与TEB相比是否能减少开胸术后慢性疼痛(CPTP)。这项初步研究将评估一项实质性试验的可行性。

方法与分析

TOPIC是一项随机对照试验,比较TEB和PVB在减轻CPTP方面的有效性。这是一项初步研究,旨在评估在两个成人胸科中心,即英格兰心脏国民保健服务基金会信托医院(HEFT)和南曼彻斯特大学国民保健服务基金会信托医院(UHSM)进行一项实质性试验及其研究过程的可行性。主要目标是确定随机分组的患者数量占符合条件患者数量的比例。次要目标包括评估研究过程。可行性分析和患者报告结局主要将采用简单描述性统计形式,并在适当情况下采用效应大小的点估计值及相关的95%置信区间。

伦理与传播

该研究已获得国民保健服务研究伦理委员会的伦理批准(伦理委员会编号14/EM/1280)。传播计划包括:告知患者和卫生专业人员;让多学科专业人员参与,以支持根据研究结果提出的确定性试验建议并提交完整的卫生技术评估申请。

试验注册号

ISRCTN45041624;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a73/5168654/2494c3e8e42f/bmjopen2016012735f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验