Agaba Edgar, Pomeroy-Stevens Amanda, Ghosh Shibani, Griffiths Jeffrey K
FTF Nutrition Innovation Lab, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
USAID SPRING Project, Kampala, Uganda.
Food Nutr Bull. 2016 Dec;37(4 suppl):S142-S150. doi: 10.1177/0379572116674553.
The 2011 Uganda Nutrition Action Plan (UNAP) established 2016 maternal and child nutrition targets. However, there is a lack of routine district-level data collection to assess UNAP implementation.
To use Nutrition Innovation Lab (NIL) data to inform policy makers on the progress of UNAP-related indicators.
The NIL collected serial household-level survey data (n = 3600) in 6 districts, including 2 UNAP implementation districts, in 2012 and 2014. Questionnaires focused on food security, nutrition, and health, among others, and included specific indicators relevant to UNAP's targets.
In 2012, outcomes in Kisoro and Lira districts were below national average for some UNAP key indicators, including dietary diversity and anemia prevalence, but above average for others (exclusive breastfeeding and underweight among women and children). The prevalence of child stunting was higher than national averages in Kisoro but below national averages in Lira. In 2014, anemia among women and children decreased significantly. Kisoro also saw improvements in several other UNAP target indicators including underweight, breastfeeding, and stunting.
Although the study showed improvements in key UNAP indicators, there is a need to invest in appropriate methods to gauge its progress because the NIL was not designed to assess UNAP. Since the quality of implementation of complex multisectoral programs can differ widely across different contexts, it is critical that effective monitoring of progress be part of such programs. National endorsement of nutrition plans doesn't in itself result in desired outcomes, hence, the allocation of scarce resources has to be based on rigorous evidence.
《2011年乌干达营养行动计划》(UNAP)设定了2016年母婴营养目标。然而,缺乏常规的地区层面数据收集来评估该计划的实施情况。
利用营养创新实验室(NIL)的数据,向政策制定者通报与UNAP相关指标的进展情况。
NIL在2012年和2014年收集了6个地区(包括2个UNAP实施地区)的系列家庭层面调查数据(n = 3600)。调查问卷聚焦于粮食安全、营养和健康等方面,包括与UNAP目标相关的具体指标。
2012年,基索罗和利拉地区在一些UNAP关键指标上的结果低于全国平均水平,包括饮食多样性和贫血患病率,但在其他指标上高于平均水平(妇女和儿童的纯母乳喂养率和体重不足率)。基索罗地区儿童发育迟缓的患病率高于全国平均水平,而利拉地区则低于全国平均水平。2014年,妇女和儿童的贫血率显著下降。基索罗地区在其他几个UNAP目标指标上也有所改善,包括体重不足、母乳喂养和发育迟缓。
尽管该研究显示UNAP关键指标有所改善,但由于NIL并非旨在评估UNAP,因此需要投入适当方法来衡量其进展。由于复杂的多部门计划的实施质量在不同背景下可能差异很大,因此对进展进行有效监测是此类计划的关键部分。国家对营养计划的认可本身并不会带来预期结果,因此,稀缺资源的分配必须基于严格的证据。