Micai Martina, Joseph Holly, Vulchanova Mila, Saldaña David
Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Department of Language and Literature, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Autism Res. 2017 May;10(5):888-900. doi: 10.1002/aur.1731. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
Previous research suggests that individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have difficulties with inference generation in reading tasks. However, most previous studies have examined how well children understand a text after reading or have measured on-line reading behavior without response to questions. The aim of this study was to investigate the online strategies of children and adolescents with autism during reading and at the same time responding to a question by monitoring their eye movements. The reading behavior of participants with ASD was compared with that of age-, language-, nonverbal intelligence-, reading-, and receptive language skills-matched participants without ASD (control group). The results showed that the ASD group were as accurate as the control group in generating inferences when answering questions about the short texts, and no differences were found between the two groups in the global paragraph reading and responding times. However, the ASD group displayed longer gaze latencies on a target word necessary to produce an inference. They also showed more regressions into the word that supported the inference compared to the control group after reading the question, irrespective of whether an inference was required or not. In conclusion, the ASD group achieved an equivalent level of inferential comprehension, but showed subtle differences in reading comprehension strategies compared to the control group. Autism Res 2017, 10: 888-900. © 2016 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
先前的研究表明,患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的个体在阅读任务中的推理生成存在困难。然而,大多数先前的研究考察的是儿童阅读后对文本的理解程度,或者测量的是在线阅读行为而没有对问题作出回应。本研究的目的是通过监测儿童和青少年自闭症患者在阅读并同时回答问题时的眼动情况,来探究他们的在线策略。将患有ASD的参与者的阅读行为与年龄、语言、非言语智力、阅读及接受性语言技能相匹配的无ASD参与者(对照组)的阅读行为进行比较。结果显示,在回答关于短文的问题时,ASD组在推理生成方面与对照组一样准确,并且两组在整体段落阅读和回答时间上没有差异。然而,ASD组对进行推理所需的目标词的注视潜伏期更长。在阅读问题后,与对照组相比,无论是否需要推理,他们对支持推理的单词的回视也更多。总之,ASD组在推理理解方面达到了同等水平,但与对照组相比,在阅读理解策略上存在细微差异。《自闭症研究》2017年,第10卷:888 - 900页。© 2016国际自闭症研究协会,威利期刊公司