• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简要报告:自闭症学生能读懂字里行间的意思。

Brief report: Autistic students read between lines.

机构信息

Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology/ERI Lectura, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010, Valencia, Spain.

Institute of Education and Centre for Literacy and Multilingualism, University of Reading, Reading, UK.

出版信息

J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 May;54(5):2055-2059. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05648-2. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-022-05648-2
PMID:35794503
Abstract

Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) tend to struggle with reading comprehension, often resulting in difficulties with inference generation. While most of the previous research has focused on the product of comprehension, we report a preliminary validation of an experimental reading task in English to measure, by means of eye-movements, the time course of generating consistent and inconsistent inferences during reading. The task was tested with a group of 12 students with ASD (age range: 10-15) who showed accuracy differences between inference and control conditions. Participants spent longer reading in the inconsistent than control condition regarding go past times and second pass times and made more regressions into the target and post-target regions, but these differences were not significant.

摘要

自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)学生往往在阅读理解方面存在困难,通常导致推理生成方面的困难。虽然之前的大多数研究都集中在理解的结果上,但我们报告了一个用英语进行的实验性阅读任务的初步验证,该任务通过眼动来衡量在阅读过程中生成一致和不一致推理的时间进程。该任务在一组 12 名 ASD 学生(年龄范围:10-15 岁)中进行了测试,他们在推理和控制条件之间表现出准确性差异。参与者在不一致条件下的阅读时间比控制条件下的阅读时间要长,无论是首次注视时间还是二次注视时间,并且在目标和后目标区域的回视次数也更多,但这些差异并不显著。

相似文献

1
Brief report: Autistic students read between lines.简要报告:自闭症学生能读懂字里行间的意思。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 May;54(5):2055-2059. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05648-2. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
2
Strategies of readers with autism when responding to inferential questions: An eye-movement study.自闭症读者回答推理问题时的策略:一项眼动研究。
Autism Res. 2017 May;10(5):888-900. doi: 10.1002/aur.1731. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
3
Processing of Written Irony in Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Eye-Movement Study.自闭症谱系障碍中书面反讽的加工处理:一项眼动研究。
Autism Res. 2015 Dec;8(6):749-60. doi: 10.1002/aur.1490. Epub 2015 May 11.
4
Processing of co-reference in autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍中的同指处理。
Autism Res. 2017 Dec;10(12):1968-1980. doi: 10.1002/aur.1845. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
5
Reading Goals and Executive Function in Autism: An Eye-Tracking Study.自闭症儿童的阅读目标与执行功能:一项眼动研究。
Autism Res. 2021 May;14(5):1007-1024. doi: 10.1002/aur.2447. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
6
Online inference making and comprehension monitoring in children during reading: Evidence from eye movements.儿童阅读过程中的在线推理和理解监控:来自眼动的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jul;74(7):1202-1224. doi: 10.1177/1747021821999007. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
7
The Scope and Nature of Reading Comprehension Impairments in School-Aged Children with Higher-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder.具有较高功能自闭症谱系障碍的学龄儿童阅读理解障碍的范围和性质。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Sep;47(9):2838-2860. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3209-y.
8
Benchmark eye movement effects during natural reading in autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍患者自然阅读过程中的基准眼动效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Jan;43(1):109-127. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000289. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
9
Emotional Processing of Ironic Versus Literal Criticism in Autistic and Nonautistic Adults: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.自闭症和非自闭症成人对讽刺与字面批评的情绪处理:眼动追踪证据。
Autism Res. 2020 Apr;13(4):563-578. doi: 10.1002/aur.2272. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
10
The Effects of a Shared Reading Intervention on Narrative Story Comprehension and Task Engagement of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder.共享阅读干预对自闭症谱系障碍学生叙事故事理解和任务参与的影响。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Oct;48(10):3608-3622. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3633-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Building Meaning: Meta-analysis of Component Skills Supporting Reading Comprehension in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.构建意义:自闭症谱系障碍儿童阅读理解的成分技能元分析。
Autism Res. 2021 May;14(5):840-858. doi: 10.1002/aur.2483. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
2
Processing of co-reference in autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍中的同指处理。
Autism Res. 2017 Dec;10(12):1968-1980. doi: 10.1002/aur.1845. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
3
Reading comprehension of ambiguous sentences by school-age children with autism spectrum disorder.
自闭症谱系障碍儿童对歧义句的阅读理解。
Autism Res. 2017 Dec;10(12):2002-2022. doi: 10.1002/aur.1850. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
4
Strategies of readers with autism when responding to inferential questions: An eye-movement study.自闭症读者回答推理问题时的策略:一项眼动研究。
Autism Res. 2017 May;10(5):888-900. doi: 10.1002/aur.1731. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
5
Working memory, reading ability and the effects of distance and typicality on anaphor resolution in children.工作记忆、阅读能力以及距离和典型性对儿童指代消解的影响。
J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2015 Jul 4;27(5):622-639. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2015.1005095.
6
Levels of text comprehension in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD): the influence of language phenotype.自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童的文本理解水平:语言表型的影响。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2014 Nov;44(11):2756-68. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2133-7.
7
Do individuals with autism process words in context? Evidence from language-mediated eye-movements.自闭症患者是否会在语境中处理单词?来自语言介导眼动的证据。
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):896-904. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.007. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
8
Assessing reading difficulties: the validity and utility of current measures of reading skill.评估阅读困难:当前阅读技能测量方法的有效性和实用性。
Br J Educ Psychol. 1997 Sep;67 ( Pt 3):359-70. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01250.x.