• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在旗帜之间:在新南威尔士州公共卫生系统中大规模实施安全网系统,以识别和管理病情恶化的患者。

Between the flags: implementing a safety-net system at scale to recognise and manage deteriorating patients in the New South Wales Public Health System.

作者信息

Pain Charles, Green Malcolm, Duff Colette, Hyland Deborah, Pantle Annette, Fitzpatrick Kimberley, Hughes Cliff

机构信息

Top End Health Service, Department of Health, Rocklands Drive, Tiwi 0810, Northern Territory.

Systems Improvement, Clinical Excellence Commission, Level 17 McKell Building, 2-24 Rawson Place Sydney 2000, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Feb 1;29(1):130-136. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw132.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzw132
PMID:27920243
Abstract

QUALITY PROBLEM

In 2005, the Clinical Excellence Commission (CEC) found that unrecognised patient deterioration remained an important problem in New South Wales (NSW) public hospitals.

INITIAL ASSESSMENT

The challenge was to design and implement an effective and sustainable safety-net system in all 225 NSW public hospitals.

DESIGNING A SOLUTION

The CEC's system was designed in collaboration with a broad coalition of partners, including clinicians, managers, system administrators and collaborating agencies. A five-element system comprising governance, standard calling criteria in standard observation charts, two-level clinical emergency response systems (CERS) in each facility, an education programme and evaluation, was designed for state-wide implementation. This system was called 'Between the Flags' (BTF).

IMPLEMENTATION

Implementation was led by the CEC on behalf of a NSW coalition, and commenced in January 2010 with the implementation of the Standard Adult General Observation Chart, awareness training for all staff and a CERS in each facility.

EVALUATION

Since the introduction of BTF, the cardiac arrest rate has declined by 42% (P < 0.05) and the Rapid Response rate has increased by 135.9% (P < 0.05) in NSW. The strength of staff support for BTF has grown with the proportion of respondents strongly agreeing that BTF has benefitted patient safety more than doubling from 21% to 44%, and overall agreement rising from 68% to 82% between 2010 and 2012.

LESSONS LEARNED

Key success factors are a focus on governance, standardisation of observation charts and striking the right balance between a rule-based approach and individual clinical judgement.

摘要

质量问题

2005年,临床卓越委员会(CEC)发现,患者病情未被识别的恶化情况在新南威尔士州(NSW)公立医院仍是一个重要问题。

初步评估

面临的挑战是在新南威尔士州所有225家公立医院设计并实施一个有效且可持续的安全网系统。

设计解决方案

临床卓越委员会的系统是与包括临床医生、管理人员、系统管理员和合作机构在内的广泛合作伙伴联盟共同设计的。设计了一个包含治理、标准观察图表中的标准呼叫标准、每个机构的两级临床应急响应系统(CERS)、教育计划和评估的五要素系统,以便在全州实施。这个系统被称为“旗帜之间”(BTF)。

实施

实施工作由临床卓越委员会代表新南威尔士州联盟牵头,于2010年1月开始,实施标准成人综合观察图表、对所有员工进行意识培训以及在每个机构建立临床应急响应系统。

评估

自引入“旗帜之间”系统以来,新南威尔士州的心脏骤停率下降了42%(P < 0.05),快速反应率提高了135.9%(P < 0.05)。员工对“旗帜之间”系统的支持力度有所增强,强烈同意该系统对患者安全有益的受访者比例从21%大幅增至44%以上,总体同意率在2010年至2012年间从68%升至82%。

经验教训

关键的成功因素包括注重治理、观察图表的标准化以及在基于规则的方法和个人临床判断之间取得恰当平衡。

相似文献

1
Between the flags: implementing a safety-net system at scale to recognise and manage deteriorating patients in the New South Wales Public Health System.在旗帜之间:在新南威尔士州公共卫生系统中大规模实施安全网系统,以识别和管理病情恶化的患者。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Feb 1;29(1):130-136. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw132.
2
Reduction of in-hospital cardiac arrest rates in intensive care-equipped New South Wales hospitals in association with implementation of Between the Flags rapid response system.与旗帜之间快速反应系统的实施相关联,降低配备有重症监护病房的新南威尔士州医院的院内心脏骤停率。
Intern Med J. 2021 Mar;51(3):375-384. doi: 10.1111/imj.14812.
3
'Between the flags': implementing a rapid response system at scale.“在旗帜之间”:大规模实施快速反应系统。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Sep;23(9):714-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002845. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
4
Impact of a standardized rapid response system on outcomes in a large healthcare jurisdiction.标准化快速反应系统对一个大型医疗辖区内各项结果的影响。
Resuscitation. 2016 Oct;107:47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.07.240. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
5
Hospital outcomes associated with introduction of a two-tiered response to the deteriorating patient.与引入针对病情恶化患者的两级应对措施相关的医院治疗结果。
Crit Care Resusc. 2015 Jun;17(2):77-82.
6
Communication and general concern criterion prior to activation of the rapid response team: a grounded theory.快速反应团队启动前的沟通与一般关注标准:一项扎根理论
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Nov;40(5):477-483. doi: 10.1071/AH15123.
7
Impact of a standardised rapid response system on clinical outcomes of female patients: an interrupted time series approach.标准化快速反应系统对女性患者临床结局的影响:一项中断时间序列研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Aug;11(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001614.
8
Benchmarking management practices in Australian public healthcare.澳大利亚公共医疗保健领域的管理实践基准评估
J Health Organ Manag. 2016;30(1):31-56. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2013-0143.
9
Impact of rapid response system implementation on critical deterioration events in children.快速反应系统实施对儿童危急恶化事件的影响。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Jan;168(1):25-33. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3266.
10
Comparison of the Between the Flags calling criteria to the MEWS, NEWS and the electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (eCART) score for the identification of deteriorating ward patients.对比 Flags 呼叫标准与 MEWS、NEWS 和电子心搏骤停风险分诊 (eCART) 评分在识别病房恶化患者中的作用。
Resuscitation. 2018 Feb;123:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Successfully initiating an escalation of care in acute ward settings-A qualitative observational study.在急性病房环境中成功启动护理升级——一项定性观察研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Feb;81(2):887-896. doi: 10.1111/jan.16248. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
2
Prognostic Accuracy of Screening Tools for Clinical Deterioration in Adults With Suspected Sepsis in Northeastern Thailand: A Cohort Validation Study.泰国东北部疑似脓毒症成年患者临床恶化筛查工具的预后准确性:一项队列验证研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 May 2;11(5):ofae245. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae245. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Predicting transfers to intensive care in children using CEWT and other early warning systems.
使用儿童早期预警工具(CEWT)和其他早期预警系统预测儿童转入重症监护病房的情况。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Dec 30;17:100540. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100540. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Breaches of pre-medical emergency team call criteria in an Australian hospital.澳大利亚一家医院违反医疗急救团队呼叫标准的情况。
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Dec 14;25(4):223-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.11.002. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
An Exploration of Nurses' Experience Following a Face-to-Face or Web-Based Intervention on Patient Deterioration.对护士在面对面或基于网络的患者病情恶化干预后的体验的探索。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 7;11(24):3112. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11243112.
6
Tiered escalation response systems in practice: A post hoc analysis examining the workload implications.实践中的分层升级响应系统:一项关于工作量影响的事后分析
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 May 20;25(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.04.010. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Impact of a care bundle for patients with blunt chest injury (ChIP): A multicentre controlled implementation evaluation.钝性胸部损伤患者护理包的影响(ChIP):一项多中心对照实施评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 7;16(10):e0256027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256027. eCollection 2021.
8
Virtual Health Care for Community Management of Patients With COVID-19 in Australia: Observational Cohort Study.澳大利亚 COVID-19 患者社区管理中的虚拟医疗保健:观察性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 9;23(3):e21064. doi: 10.2196/21064.
9
The Use of Rapid Response Teams to Reduce Failure to Rescue Events: A Systematic Review.运用快速反应团队减少救援失败事件:系统评价。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Sep;16(3S Suppl 1):S3-S7. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000748.
10
Exploring User Needs in the Development of a Virtual Reality-Based Advanced Life Support Training Platform: Exploratory Usability Study.探索基于虚拟现实的高级生命支持培训平台开发中的用户需求:探索性可用性研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2020 Aug 7;8(3):e20797. doi: 10.2196/20797.