• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作程序绩效评估方法提案

Proposal for an Evaluation Method for the Performance of Work Procedures.

作者信息

Mohammed Mouda, Mébarek Djebabra, Wafa Boulagouas, Makhlouf Chati

机构信息

LRPI-Laboratory, Health and Safety Institute, University of Batna 2, Batna, Algeria.

HSE Department of Regional Direction of Hassi R'mel, Group of Sonatrach, Laghouat, Algeria.

出版信息

Saf Health Work. 2016 Dec;7(4):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.shaw.2016.04.007
PMID:27924232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5128002/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Noncompliance of operators with work procedures is a recurrent problem. This human behavior has been said to be situational and studied by many different approaches (ergonomic and others), which consider the noncompliance with work procedures to be obvious and seek to analyze its causes as well as consequences.

METHODS

The object of the proposed method is to solve this problem by focusing on the performance of work procedures and ensuring improved performance on a continuous basis.

RESULTS

This study has multiple results: (1) assessment of the work procedures' performance by a multicriteria approach; (2) the use of a continuous improvement approach as a framework for the sustainability of the assessment method of work procedures' performance; and (3) adaptation of the Stop-Card as a facilitator support for continuous improvement of work procedures.

CONCLUSION

The proposed method emphasizes to put in value the inputs of continuous improvement of the work procedures in relation with the conventional approaches which adopt the obvious evidence of the noncompliance to the working procedures and seek to analyze the cause-effect relationships related to this unacceptable phenomenon, especially in strategic industry.

摘要

背景

操作人员不遵守工作程序是一个反复出现的问题。这种人类行为被认为是情境性的,并已通过许多不同的方法(人机工程学及其他方法)进行研究,这些方法认为不遵守工作程序是显而易见的,并试图分析其原因及后果。

方法

所提出方法的目标是通过关注工作程序的执行情况并确保持续改进其绩效来解决这一问题。

结果

本研究有多个结果:(1)通过多标准方法评估工作程序的绩效;(2)使用持续改进方法作为工作程序绩效评估方法可持续性的框架;(3)调整“停止卡”作为促进工作程序持续改进的支持手段。

结论

与传统方法相比,所提出的方法强调重视工作程序持续改进的投入,传统方法采用不遵守工作程序这一明显证据,并试图分析与这种不可接受现象相关的因果关系,尤其是在战略行业中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/227dfd431cb2/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/1c21ca82d773/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/e6bf237a4822/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/a9467775ddee/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/fed6c52660d3/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/effbb88c1422/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/aa5e28b2697c/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/227dfd431cb2/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/1c21ca82d773/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/e6bf237a4822/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/a9467775ddee/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/fed6c52660d3/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/effbb88c1422/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/aa5e28b2697c/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e8/5128002/227dfd431cb2/gr7.jpg

相似文献

1
Proposal for an Evaluation Method for the Performance of Work Procedures.工作程序绩效评估方法提案
Saf Health Work. 2016 Dec;7(4):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 14.
2
Integrating the Ergonomics Techniques with Multi Criteria Decision Making as a New Approach for Risk Management: An Assessment of Repetitive Tasks -Entropy Case Study.将人体工程学技术与多标准决策相结合作为风险管理的新方法:重复性任务的评估——熵案例研究
J Res Health Sci. 2016 Spring;16(2):85-9.
3
Anthropometric assessment of crane cabins and recommendations for design: A case study.起重机驾驶室的人体测量评估及设计建议:一个案例研究
Work. 2015;52(1):185-94. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152042.
4
Determinants of business sustainability: an ergonomics perspective.企业可持续发展的决定因素:人机工程学视角
Ergonomics. 2009 Mar;52(3):273-301. doi: 10.1080/00140130802376042.
5
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
6
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
7
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.OCRA 方法评估上肢生物力学过载风险的科学基础,作为 ISO 生物力学风险因素标准中的首选方法。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):436-438. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3746.
8
Improving productivity in child welfare programs.提高儿童福利项目的效率。
Child Welfare. 1983 Sep-Oct;62(5):409-20.
9
[Risk assessment for upper extremity work related muscoloskeletal disorders in different manufactures by applying six methods of ergonomic analysis].[应用六种人体工程学分析方法对不同制造业上肢工作相关肌肉骨骼疾病进行风险评估]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2010 Apr-Jun;32(2):162-73.
10
[Evaluation of ergonomic load of clinical nursing procedures].[临床护理操作的工效学负荷评估]
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Aug 20;35(8):581-584. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2017.08.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural model of factors contributing to the motivational problem of taking shortcuts at construction workplaces in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯王国建筑工作场所走捷径动机问题促成因素的结构模型。
Heliyon. 2019 Feb 15;5(2):e01220. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01220. eCollection 2019 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
The Type of Payment and Working Conditions.支付类型与工作条件。
Saf Health Work. 2015 Dec;6(4):289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
2
Safety culture assessment in petrochemical industry: a comparative study of two algerian plants.石化行业安全文化评估:两个阿尔及利亚工厂的对比研究。
Saf Health Work. 2014 Jun;5(2):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
3
Psychosocial risks: is risk management strategic enough in business and policy making?心理社会风险:在商业和政策制定中,风险管理是否足够具有战略性?
Saf Health Work. 2013 Jun;4(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
4
Policies and procedures in the workplace: how health care organizations compare.工作场所的政策与程序:医疗保健组织之比较
Healthc Manage Forum. 1993 Summer;6(2):39-43. doi: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)61089-7.