Division of Pharmacology and Clinical Drug Evaluation, Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Dec 13;68(23):2508-2521. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.944.
Oral anticoagulation reduces the risk of mortality in atrial fibrillation (AF), but examination of the causes of death is essential to design new strategies to further reduce the high mortality rates observed in this population.
The authors sought to analyze and compare causes of death in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) or warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in AF.
The authors systematically searched for randomized trials of DOAC versus warfarin for prevention of stroke/SE in AF. The main outcome was mortality and independently adjudicated specific causes of death. The authors used the random effects model of meta-analysis to combine the studies.
71,683 patients from 4 trials were included (134,046 patient-years of follow-up). A total of 6,206 patients (9%) died during follow-up. Adjusted mortality rate was 4.72%/year (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.19 to 5.28). Cardiac deaths accounted for 46% of all deaths, whereas nonhemorrhagic stroke/SE and hemorrhage-related deaths represented 5.7% and 5.6% of the total mortality, respectively. Compared with patients who were alive, those who died had more frequent history of heart failure (odds ratio [OR]: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.44), permanent/persistent AF (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.25 to 1.52) and diabetes (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.68); were more frequently male (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.37) and older (mean difference 3.2 years; 95% CI: 1.6 to 4.8); and had a lower creatinine clearance (-9.9 ml/min; 95% CI: -11.3 to -8.4). There was a small, but significant, reduction in all-cause mortality with the DOAC versus warfarin (difference -0.42%/year; 95% CI: -0.66 to -0.18), mainly driven by a reduction in fatal bleedings.
In contemporary AF trials, most deaths were cardiac-related, whereas stroke and bleeding represented only a small subset of deaths. Interventions beyond anticoagulation are needed to further reduce mortality in AF.
口服抗凝剂可降低房颤(AF)患者的死亡率,但为了设计新的策略以进一步降低该人群观察到的高死亡率,检查死亡原因至关重要。
作者旨在分析和比较接受直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)或华法林预防 AF 中风和全身性栓塞(SE)的患者的死亡原因。
作者系统地检索了 DOAC 与华法林预防 AF 中风/SE 的随机试验。主要结局是死亡率和独立裁定的特定死因。作者使用荟萃分析的随机效应模型来合并研究。
来自 4 项试验的 71683 名患者(134046 患者年随访)被纳入研究。随访期间共有 6206 名患者(9%)死亡。调整后的死亡率为每年 4.72%(95%置信区间[CI]:4.19 至 5.28)。心脏死亡占所有死亡的 46%,而非出血性中风/SE 和出血相关死亡分别占总死亡率的 5.7%和 5.6%。与存活患者相比,死亡患者更常患有心力衰竭病史(比值比[OR]:1.75;95%CI:1.25 至 2.44)、永久性/持续性 AF(OR:1.38;95%CI:1.25 至 1.52)和糖尿病(OR:1.37;95%CI:1.11 至 1.68);更常为男性(OR:1.24;95%CI:1.13 至 1.37)和年龄较大(平均差异 3.2 岁;95%CI:1.6 至 4.8);肌酐清除率较低(-9.9 ml/min;95%CI:-11.3 至-8.4)。与华法林相比,DOAC 可使全因死亡率降低(差异为-0.42%/年;95%CI:-0.66 至-0.18),这一差异虽小,但具有统计学意义,主要是由致命性出血减少所驱动。
在当代 AF 试验中,大多数死亡与心脏相关,而中风和出血仅占死亡人数的一小部分。需要除抗凝以外的干预措施来进一步降低 AF 的死亡率。