Lakhtakia Sundeep
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, 6-3-661, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082, India.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;30(5):807-823. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) provides the unique opportunity to visualize, interrogate and intervene gastrointestinal (GI) luminal, mural or peri-luminal structures and pathology with negligible adverse effects. Diagnostic, upper GI and rectal EUS is feasible, extremely safe, and efficacious. Most EUS guided interventions are safe, effective and minimally invasive, compared to peers in the percutaneous radiological or surgical procedures. As with any endoscopic procedure, EUS and its guided interventions may be accompanied by adverse events. EUS related complications are generally infrequent in expert hands, and mainly include bleeding and perforation. However, the nature and severity of adverse events associated with each EUS guided procedure are unique. Hence, it is paramount for endosonographer to have sufficient knowledge of the indications, techniques, and potential risks involved before contemplating any given procedure. Most common intervention with EUS is transmural fine needle aspiration (FNA), which is an extremely safe procedure. EUS guided drainage procedures are rapidly evolving with newer devices and methods being employed. Among them, EUS guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection-pseudocyst or walled off necrosis (WON), has largely replaced other methods (surgical, percutaneous or non-EUS endoscopic) with acceptable complications. Currently, dedicated metal stents are more widely used compared to plastic stents for drainage of PFC, especially WON. EUS has made a definite impact in biliary access and drainage of obstructed biliary system, in patients where ERCP has failed or is technically not possible, closely competing with percutaneous biliary drainage. In spite of some complications, recent improvement in devices for bilio-enteric fistula creation and stent designs, has added to its safety and efficacy. EUS guided pancreatic duct drainage remains the most challenging of EUS guided interventions where in-roads are being made.
内镜超声(EUS)提供了独特的机会来可视化、检查和干预胃肠道(GI)管腔、壁层或管腔周围结构及病变,且副作用可忽略不计。诊断性上消化道和直肠EUS是可行的、极其安全且有效的。与经皮放射或外科手术相比,大多数EUS引导的干预措施安全、有效且微创。与任何内镜手术一样,EUS及其引导的干预措施可能会伴有不良事件。在专家手中,EUS相关并发症通常并不常见,主要包括出血和穿孔。然而,与每种EUS引导手术相关的不良事件的性质和严重程度各不相同。因此,对于内镜超声检查医师来说,在考虑任何特定手术之前,充分了解其适应证、技术和潜在风险至关重要。EUS最常见的干预措施是经壁细针穿刺抽吸(FNA),这是一种极其安全的手术。随着更新的设备和方法的应用,EUS引导的引流手术正在迅速发展。其中,EUS引导下胰腺液体积聚(假性囊肿或包裹性坏死[WON])的引流,已在很大程度上取代了其他方法(手术、经皮或非EUS内镜),且并发症可接受。目前,与塑料支架相比,专用金属支架在胰腺液体积聚引流(尤其是WON)中应用更为广泛。在ERCP失败或技术上不可行的患者中,EUS在胆管通路和梗阻性胆管系统引流方面产生了明确的影响,与经皮胆管引流形成了激烈竞争。尽管存在一些并发症,但最近胆肠瘘创建设备和支架设计的改进,提高了其安全性和有效性。EUS引导的胰管引流仍然是EUS引导干预中最具挑战性的领域,目前正在取得进展。