• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解决英国丙型肝炎病毒负担:描述和评估临床及经济后果。

Tackling the burden of the hepatitis C virus in the UK: characterizing and assessing the clinical and economic consequences.

机构信息

Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, UK.

Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, UK; Department of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Public Health. 2016 Dec;141:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2016.08.002
PMID:27932014
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains a significant public health issue. This study aimed to quantify the clinical and economic burden of chronic hepatitis C in the UK, stratified by disease severity, age and awareness of infection, with concurrent assessment of the impact of implementing a treatment prioritization approach.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A previously published back projection, natural history and cost-effectiveness HCV model was adapted to a UK setting to estimate the disease burden of chronic hepatitis C and end-stage liver disease (ESLD) between 1980 and 2035. A published meta-regression analysis informed disease progression, and UK-specific data informed other model inputs.

RESULTS

At 2015, prevalence of chronic hepatitis C is estimated to be 241,487 with 22.20%, 33.72%, 17.22%, 16.67% and 10.19% of patients in METAVIR stages F0, F1, F2, F3 and F4, respectively, but is estimated to fall to 193,999 by 2035. ESLD incidence is predicted to peak in 2031. Assuming all patients are diagnosed and treatment is prioritized in F3 and F4 using highly efficacious direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens, a 69.85% reduction in ESLD incidence is predicted between 2015 and 2035, and the cumulative discounted medical expenditure associated with the lifetime management of incident ESLD events is estimated to be £1,202,827,444.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of chronic hepatitis C is expected to fall in coming decades; however, the ongoing financial burden is expected to be high due to an increase in ESLD incidence. This study highlights the significant costs of managing ESLD that are likely to be incurred without the employment of effective treatment approaches.

摘要

目的

丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)仍然是一个重大的公共卫生问题。本研究旨在量化英国慢性丙型肝炎的临床和经济负担,按疾病严重程度、年龄和感染意识进行分层,并同时评估实施治疗优先排序方法的影响。

研究设计和方法

我们对以前发表的回溯预测、自然史和成本效益 HCV 模型进行了调整,以评估英国 1980 年至 2035 年慢性丙型肝炎和终末期肝病(ESLD)的疾病负担。一项已发表的荟萃回归分析提供了疾病进展信息,而英国特有的数据则为其他模型输入提供了信息。

结果

在 2015 年,慢性丙型肝炎的患病率估计为 241487 例,其中 METAVIR 分期 F0、F1、F2、F3 和 F4 的患者分别占 22.20%、33.72%、17.22%、16.67%和 10.19%,但预计到 2035 年将降至 193999 例。ESLD 的发病率预计将在 2031 年达到峰值。假设所有患者均被诊断出来,并在 F3 和 F4 中使用高效直接作用抗病毒(DAA)方案进行治疗优先排序,那么 2015 年至 2035 年 ESLD 的发病率预计将降低 69.85%,并且终生管理 ESLD 事件的累计折扣医疗支出预计将达到 1202827444 英镑。

结论

在未来几十年,慢性丙型肝炎的患病率预计将会下降;然而,由于 ESLD 发病率的增加,预计仍将面临高昂的财政负担。本研究强调了在不采用有效治疗方法的情况下,管理 ESLD 可能带来的巨大成本。

相似文献

1
Tackling the burden of the hepatitis C virus in the UK: characterizing and assessing the clinical and economic consequences.解决英国丙型肝炎病毒负担:描述和评估临床及经济后果。
Public Health. 2016 Dec;141:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
2
The future disease burden of hepatitis C virus infection in Sweden and the impact of different treatment strategies.瑞典丙型肝炎病毒感染的未来疾病负担及不同治疗策略的影响。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;50(2):233-44. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.990505. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
3
A clinician's guide to the cost and health benefits of hepatitis C cure assessed from the individual patient perspective.从个体患者角度评估丙型肝炎治愈的成本和健康效益的临床医生指南。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Feb;29(2):208-214. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000773.
4
The cost-effectiveness of daclatasvir-based regimens for the treatment of hepatitis C virus genotypes 1 and 4 in the UK.在英国,基于达卡他韦的治疗方案用于治疗丙型肝炎病毒1型和4型的成本效益。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;28(2):173-80. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000510.
5
Impact of disease severity on healthcare costs in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) virus infection.慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)病毒感染患者疾病严重程度对医疗成本的影响。
Hepatology. 2012 Nov;56(5):1651-60. doi: 10.1002/hep.25842. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
6
Assessing the burden of illness of chronic hepatitis C and impact of direct-acting antiviral use on healthcare costs in Medicaid.评估慢性丙型肝炎的疾病负担以及直接作用抗病毒药物在医疗补助计划中对医疗成本的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jun;25(8 Suppl):S131-S139.
7
Estimating the clinical and economic benefit associated with incremental improvements in sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitis C.评估慢性丙型肝炎持续病毒学应答的逐步改善所带来的临床和经济效益。
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0117334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117334. eCollection 2015.
8
Value of Sustained Virologic Response in Patients with Hepatitis C as a Function of Time to Progression of End-Stage Liver Disease.丙型肝炎患者持续病毒学应答作为终末期肝病进展时间函数的价值。
Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Jan;37(1):61-70. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0458-z.
9
Economic Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Extension to Early-Stage Fibrosis Patients: Evidence from the PITER Real-World Cohort.《从 PITER 真实世界队列研究看将丙型肝炎病毒治疗扩展至早期纤维化患者的经济学评价》。
Value Health. 2018 Jul;21(7):783-791. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
10
Assessing the cost utility of response-guided therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 in the UK using the MONARCH model.采用 MONARCH 模型评估英国慢性丙型肝炎基因型 1 患者应答指导治疗的成本效用。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Feb;11(1):53-63. doi: 10.1007/s40258-012-0002-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost Effectiveness of Screening for Hepatitis C Virus in Iraq in the Era of Simplified Testing and Treatment.在简化检测和治疗时代伊拉克丙型肝炎病毒筛查的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Nov;39(11):1327-1341. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01064-z. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
2
Effectiveness of generic direct-acting agents for the treatment of hepatitis C: systematic review and meta-analysis.通用直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Mar 1;98(3):188-197K. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.231522. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
3
Modelling the impact of different testing strategies for HCV infection in Switzerland.
模拟瑞士不同丙型肝炎病毒感染检测策略的影响。
J Virus Erad. 2019 Nov 4;5(4):191-203. doi: 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30036-4.
4
Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions for chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review of model-based analyses.慢性丙型肝炎诊断和治疗干预措施的成本效益:基于模型分析的系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jun 13;18(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0515-9.
5
Assessing uncertainty in the burden of hepatitis C virus: Comparison of estimated disease burden and treatment costs in the UK.评估丙型肝炎病毒负担的不确定性:英国估计疾病负担与治疗成本的比较。
J Viral Hepat. 2018 May;25(5):514-523. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12847. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
Micro-costing analysis of guideline-based treatment by direct-acting agents: the real-life case of hepatitis C management in Brazil.基于直接作用抗病毒药物的指南治疗的微观成本分析:巴西丙型肝炎管理的实际案例
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0676-8.
7
Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of One-Time Screening and Treatment for Hepatitis C in Korea.估算韩国丙型肝炎一次性筛查和治疗的成本效益
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0167770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167770. eCollection 2017.