• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估丙型肝炎病毒负担的不确定性:英国估计疾病负担与治疗成本的比较。

Assessing uncertainty in the burden of hepatitis C virus: Comparison of estimated disease burden and treatment costs in the UK.

作者信息

Gubay F, Staunton R, Metzig C, Abubakar I, White P J

机构信息

MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling and NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling Methodology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Viral Hepat. 2018 May;25(5):514-523. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12847. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1111/jvh.12847
PMID:29274178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5947569/
Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major and growing public health concern. We need to know the expected health burden and treatment cost, and understand uncertainty in those estimates, to inform policymaking and future research. Two models that have been important in informing treatment guidelines and assessments of HCV burden were compared by simulating cohorts of individuals with chronic HCV infection initially aged 20, 35 and 50 years. One model predicts that health losses (measured in quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) and treatment costs decrease with increasing initial age of the patients, whilst the other model predicts that below 40 years, costs increase and QALY losses change little with age, and above 40 years, they decline with increasing age. Average per-patient costs differ between the models by up to 38%, depending on the patients' initial age. One model predicts double the total number, and triple the peak annual incidence, of liver transplants compared to the other model. One model predicts 55%-314% more deaths than the other, depending on the patients' initial age. The main sources of difference between the models are estimated progression rates between disease states and rates of health service utilization associated with different disease states and, in particular, the age dependency of these parameters. We conclude that decision-makers need to be aware that uncertainties in the health burden and economic cost of HCV disease have important consequences for predictions of future need for care and cost-effectiveness of interventions to avert HCV transmission, and further quantification is required to inform decisions.

摘要

丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)是一个日益严重的重大公共卫生问题。我们需要了解预期的健康负担和治疗成本,并认识到这些估计中的不确定性,以便为政策制定和未来研究提供信息。通过模拟初始年龄为20岁、35岁和50岁的慢性HCV感染个体队列,对在为HCV负担的治疗指南和评估提供信息方面具有重要作用的两种模型进行了比较。一种模型预测,健康损失(以质量调整生命年[QALYs]衡量)和治疗成本会随着患者初始年龄的增加而降低,而另一种模型预测,在40岁以下,成本会增加,QALY损失随年龄变化不大,在40岁以上,它们会随着年龄的增加而下降。根据患者的初始年龄,各模型之间的人均成本差异高达38%。与另一种模型相比,一种模型预测的肝移植总数是其两倍,年度发病率峰值是其三倍。根据患者的初始年龄,一种模型预测的死亡人数比另一种模型多55%-314%。各模型之间差异的主要来源是疾病状态之间的估计进展率以及与不同疾病状态相关的卫生服务利用率,特别是这些参数的年龄依赖性。我们得出结论,决策者需要意识到,HCV疾病的健康负担和经济成本的不确定性对未来护理需求的预测以及避免HCV传播干预措施的成本效益具有重要影响,需要进一步量化以提供决策依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db80/5947569/d6b65518ef51/JVH-25-514-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db80/5947569/bfbe2cbf6bb6/JVH-25-514-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db80/5947569/864bba4e6907/JVH-25-514-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db80/5947569/54938c12b146/JVH-25-514-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db80/5947569/d6b65518ef51/JVH-25-514-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db80/5947569/bfbe2cbf6bb6/JVH-25-514-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db80/5947569/864bba4e6907/JVH-25-514-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db80/5947569/54938c12b146/JVH-25-514-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db80/5947569/d6b65518ef51/JVH-25-514-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing uncertainty in the burden of hepatitis C virus: Comparison of estimated disease burden and treatment costs in the UK.评估丙型肝炎病毒负担的不确定性:英国估计疾病负担与治疗成本的比较。
J Viral Hepat. 2018 May;25(5):514-523. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12847. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
2
Cost-effectiveness of treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection in an evolving patient population.不断变化的患者群体中慢性丙型肝炎感染治疗的成本效益
JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):228-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.2.228.
3
The cost-effectiveness of testing for hepatitis C in former injecting drug users.对曾经注射吸毒者进行丙型肝炎检测的成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(32):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-93. doi: 10.3310/hta10320.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Access Expansion to Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection Through Primary Care Providers.通过基层医疗服务提供者扩大丙型肝炎病毒治疗可及性的成本效益分析。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Dec;153(6):1531-1543.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.016. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
5
Assessing the burden of illness of chronic hepatitis C and impact of direct-acting antiviral use on healthcare costs in Medicaid.评估慢性丙型肝炎的疾病负担以及直接作用抗病毒药物在医疗补助计划中对医疗成本的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jun;25(8 Suppl):S131-S139.
6
Burden of disease and cost of chronic hepatitis C infection in Canada.加拿大慢性丙型肝炎感染的疾病负担和成本。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 May;28(5):243-50. doi: 10.1155/2014/317623.
7
Cost-effectiveness of Universal and Targeted Hepatitis C Virus Screening in the United States.美国普遍和靶向性丙型肝炎病毒筛查的成本效益分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2015756. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15756.
8
Cost-effectiveness of treating chronic hepatitis C virus with direct-acting antivirals in people who inject drugs in Australia.在澳大利亚,对注射毒品者使用直接抗病毒药物治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒的成本效益分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;31(4):872-82. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13223.
9
All-cause and incremental per patient per year cost associated with chronic hepatitis C virus and associated liver complications in the United States: a managed care perspective.美国慢性丙型肝炎病毒及其相关肝脏并发症的全因成本及每位患者每年的增量成本:管理式医疗视角
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Sep;17(7):531-46. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.7.531.
10
Peginterferon alfa and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in patients eligible for shortened treatment, re-treatment or in HCV/HIV co-infection: a systematic review and economic evaluation.聚乙二醇干扰素 α 和利巴韦林治疗适合缩短疗程、再治疗或合并 HCV/HIV 感染的慢性丙型肝炎患者:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Apr;15(17):i-xii, 1-210. doi: 10.3310/hta15170.

引用本文的文献

1
The mediating role of anxiety in disease uncertainty and acute stress in acute ischaemic stroke patients in the post-epidemic era.焦虑在疫情后时代急性缺血性脑卒中患者疾病不确定性与急性应激之间的中介作用
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 17;14:1218390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1218390. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Corrigendum to 'EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C: Final update of the series [J Hepatol 73 (2020) 1170-1218].《欧洲肝脏研究学会丙型肝炎治疗推荐:系列最终更新版》勘误 [《肝脏病学杂志》73卷(2020年)1170 - 1218页]
J Hepatol. 2023 Feb;78(2):452. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
2
Interferon gamma release assays for Diagnostic Evaluation of Active tuberculosis (IDEA): test accuracy study and economic evaluation.干扰素释放试验用于活动性结核病的诊断评估(IDEA):试验准确性研究和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 May;23(23):1-152. doi: 10.3310/hta23230.
3
Impact of Hepatitis C Treatment as Prevention for People Who Inject Drugs is sensitive to contact network structure.
丙型肝炎治疗作为预防药物使用者的影响对接触网络结构敏感。
Sci Rep. 2017 May 12;7(1):1833. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01862-6.
4
Tackling the burden of the hepatitis C virus in the UK: characterizing and assessing the clinical and economic consequences.解决英国丙型肝炎病毒负担:描述和评估临床及经济后果。
Public Health. 2016 Dec;141:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
5
Improving Control of Tuberculosis in Low-Burden Countries: Insights from Mathematical Modeling.改善低负担国家的结核病控制:数学建模的见解
Front Microbiol. 2016 May 3;7:394. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00394. eCollection 2016.
6
The evolving epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: a global perspective.肝细胞癌不断演变的流行病学:全球视角
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jun;9(6):765-79. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2015.1028363. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
7
Estimating the clinical and economic benefit associated with incremental improvements in sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitis C.评估慢性丙型肝炎持续病毒学应答的逐步改善所带来的临床和经济效益。
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0117334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117334. eCollection 2015.
8
Strategies for the treatment of Hepatitis C in an era of interferon-free therapies: what public health outcomes do we value most?无干扰素治疗时代丙型肝炎的治疗策略:我们最看重哪些公共卫生结局?
Gut. 2015 Nov;64(11):1800-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308166. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
Increased uptake and new therapies are needed to avert rising hepatitis C-related end stage liver disease in England: modelling the predicted impact of treatment under different scenarios.需要增加摄取量和新疗法来避免英格兰丙型肝炎相关终末期肝病的上升:在不同情况下模拟治疗的预测影响。
J Hepatol. 2014 Sep;61(3):530-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 May 10.
10
Hepatitis C virus treatment for prevention among people who inject drugs: Modeling treatment scale-up in the age of direct-acting antivirals.丙型肝炎病毒治疗预防注射吸毒人群:在直接作用抗病毒药物时代的治疗扩大规模建模。
Hepatology. 2013 Nov;58(5):1598-609. doi: 10.1002/hep.26431. Epub 2013 Aug 26.