1 West Midlands Deanery, Birmingham, UK.
2 Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Palliat Med. 2017 Oct;31(9):833-841. doi: 10.1177/0269216316679927. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
The Liverpool Care Pathway was used in UK hospitals (late 1990s to July 2014) in an attempt to generate hospice-style high-quality end-of-life care in acute settings. Despite being widely established, there was limited research or contextual evidence regarding this approach or its impact. Growing criticism from the public, media, politicians and healthcare professionals culminated with a critical independent review (July 2013) and subsequent withdrawal of the Liverpool Care Pathway.
This research explores experiences of doctors using the Liverpool Care Pathway, prior to and during its withdrawal, to better understand shortfallings and inform future initiatives in hospital end-of-life care.
Individual semi-structured audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and concurrently analysed using thematic analysis.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Following ethical approval, volunteer participants from an acute UK hospital were sought ( n = 73). A total of 18 specialist doctors were purposively selected.
Seven themes shaped doctors' experiences of using the Liverpool Care Pathway: (1) changing perceptions according to length of clinical practice, (2) individual interpretation and application of the Liverpool Care Pathway, (3) limitations arising from setting, speciality and basic end-of-life care competence, (4) understanding and acceptance of medical uncertainty at the end-of-life, (5) centrality of communication and fear of discussing dying, (6) external challenges, including a culture to cure, role modelling and the media and (7) desire for reassurance in end-of-life care decisions.
Future initiatives in hospital end-of-life care must address doctors' fears, (in)abilty to tolerate medical uncertainty, communication skills and understanding of the dying phase, in order to provide optimum care in the last days of life.
利物浦护理路径在英国医院(20 世纪 90 年代末至 2014 年 7 月)中使用,试图在急性环境中产生临终关怀式的高质量临终关怀。尽管已广泛建立,但针对这种方法或其影响的研究或背景证据有限。公众、媒体、政治家和医疗保健专业人员的日益批评最终导致了独立的批判性审查(2013 年 7 月)和随后对利物浦护理路径的撤回。
这项研究探讨了医生在利物浦护理路径之前和期间使用该路径的经验,以更好地了解不足并为医院临终关怀的未来计划提供信息。
对来自英国一家急性医院的志愿者参与者(n=73)进行了单独的半结构化音频记录访谈,并使用主题分析进行了同时分析。
设置/参与者:在获得伦理批准后,从一家英国急性医院中招募了志愿参与者(n=73)。总共选择了 18 名专科医生进行有针对性的选择。
有七个主题塑造了医生使用利物浦护理路径的经验:(1)根据临床实践的长短而改变观念,(2)对利物浦护理路径的个人解释和应用,(3)来自环境、专业和基本临终关怀能力的限制,(4)在临终时理解和接受医学不确定性,(5)沟通的中心地位和对死亡讨论的恐惧,(6)外部挑战,包括治愈文化、榜样作用和媒体,(7)在临终关怀决策中需要得到安慰。
医院临终关怀的未来计划必须解决医生的恐惧、(无法)容忍医学不确定性、沟通技巧和对临终阶段的理解,以在生命的最后几天提供最佳护理。