• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠切除切缘对无淋巴结转移结肠癌的影响。

Impact of bowel resection margins in node negative colon cancer.

作者信息

Rocha Ricardo, Marinho Rui, Aparício David, Fragoso Marta, Sousa Marta, Gomes António, Leichsenring Carlos, Carneiro Carla, Geraldes Vasco, Nunes Vítor

机构信息

B Surgery Department, Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Estrada IC-19, 2720-276 Amadora, Portugal.

出版信息

Springerplus. 2016 Nov 11;5(1):1959. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3650-y. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1186/s40064-016-3650-y
PMID:27933239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5106413/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Surgical intestinal resection margins in colon cancer are a longstanding debate in terms the optimal distance between the tumor and the colonic section line. The aim of this study is to define the oncological outcomes in relation to surgical margins, measured in terms or recurrence rate, time-to-recurrence, disease-free survival and overall survival in a population of node negative colon cancer patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational longitudinal single institution study. All patients submitted to colon cancer surgery between January 2006 and December 2010 were analyzed. Only node negative patients were included in the study, with analysis of 215 patient charts, divided in two groups (Intestinal margin lower than 5 cm-group 1; and 5 cm or higher-group 2).

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 70.4 years (±11.7), with a male predominance (57.7%). Group 2 more frequently corresponded to Stage II (83 vs 71%; p = 0.05). Global mean total lymph nodes harvested were 12, and were higher in group II than in group I (13.8 ± 8.2 vs 10.4 ± 5.7; p = 0.001). In terms of time-to-recurrence patients of group 2 had longer time than patients of group 1 (32.3 ± 12.1 vs 21.8 ± 13.8 months; p = 0.03), as well as a lower recurrence rate in group I (13.7 vs 17.2%), despite not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has showed that patients with 5 cm or higher bowel resection margins had longer time-to-recurrence that was statistically significant. Recurrence rates were lower in the group of patients with longer surgical margins, however not statistically significant.

摘要

目的

在结肠癌手术中,关于肿瘤与结肠切除线之间的最佳距离,手术肠切除切缘一直是个长期存在争议的问题。本研究的目的是确定在一组淋巴结阴性的结肠癌患者中,与手术切缘相关的肿瘤学结局,以复发率、复发时间、无病生存期和总生存期来衡量。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性观察性纵向单机构研究。分析了2006年1月至2010年12月期间所有接受结肠癌手术的患者。本研究仅纳入淋巴结阴性的患者,分析了215份患者病历,分为两组(肠切缘低于5厘米——第1组;以及5厘米或更高——第2组)。

结果

患者的平均年龄为70.4岁(±11.7),男性占优势(57.7%)。第2组更常对应II期(83%对71%;p = 0.05)。全球平均采集的总淋巴结数为12个,第2组高于第1组(13.8±8.2对10.4±5.7;p = 0.001)。在复发时间方面,第2组患者的时间比第1组患者长(32.3±12.1对21.8±13.8个月;p = 0.03),并且第1组的复发率较低(13.7%对17.2%),尽管无统计学意义。

结论

本研究表明,肠切除切缘为5厘米或更高的患者复发时间更长,具有统计学意义。手术切缘较长的患者组复发率较低,但无统计学意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954e/5106413/334f30cf2f3b/40064_2016_3650_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954e/5106413/cdd9a5f44ed1/40064_2016_3650_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954e/5106413/334f30cf2f3b/40064_2016_3650_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954e/5106413/cdd9a5f44ed1/40064_2016_3650_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954e/5106413/334f30cf2f3b/40064_2016_3650_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of bowel resection margins in node negative colon cancer.肠切除切缘对无淋巴结转移结肠癌的影响。
Springerplus. 2016 Nov 11;5(1):1959. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3650-y. eCollection 2016.
2
The oncological and surgical safety of robot-assisted surgery in colorectal cancer: outcomes of a longitudinal prospective cohort study.机器人辅助手术在结直肠癌中的肿瘤学和外科安全性:一项纵向前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3644-3655. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06653-2. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
3
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].[I a2-II a2期宫颈癌腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术后的长期肿瘤学结局:一项配对队列研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901.
4
Non-anatomical colonic resections: splenic flexure and transverse colectomy. Central vascular ligation is crucial for survival.非解剖性结肠切除术:脾曲和横结肠切除术。中央血管结扎对生存至关重要。
Minerva Chir. 2019 Apr;74(2):176-186. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07803-3. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
5
The impact of tamoxifen on breast recurrence, cosmesis, complications, and survival in estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer.他莫昔芬对雌激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌患者乳腺复发、美容效果、并发症及生存的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Jul 1;35(4):669-77. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(96)00185-x.
6
[Efficacy comparison between surgical resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer in a domestic single center].[国内单中心早期胃癌手术切除与内镜黏膜下剥离术的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 25;21(2):190-195.
7
[The clinical and pathological research of complete mesocolic excision on the treatment of right colon cancer].完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右结肠癌的临床与病理研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jan 1;54(1):25-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2016.01.007.
8
The adequacy of lymph node clearance in colon cancer surgery performed in a non-specialist centre; implications for practice.非专科医院行结肠癌手术时淋巴结清扫的充分性;对实践的影响。
Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Feb;189(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02044-1. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
9
Optimal ligation level of the primary feeding artery and bowel resection margin in colon cancer surgery: the influence of the site of the primary feeding artery.结肠癌手术中主要供血动脉的最佳结扎水平及肠切除边缘:主要供血动脉位置的影响
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Dec;48(12):2232-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0161-2.
10
Is laparoscopic surgery really effective for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer in very elderly over 80 years old? A prospective multicentric case-control assessment.腹腔镜手术对80岁以上超高龄患者的结直肠癌治疗真的有效吗?一项前瞻性多中心病例对照评估。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4372-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4755-7. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncological merits of intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis for right-sided colon cancer.右侧结肠癌体内吻合与体外吻合的肿瘤学优势
Surg Today. 2025 May 24. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03054-6.
2
Exploring extracellular matrix and prostaglandin pathway alterations across varying resection margin distances of right-sided colonic adenocarcinoma.探讨右半结肠癌不同切缘距离下细胞外基质和前列腺素通路的改变。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Dec 7;23(1):1202. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11595-7.
3
Colonic lipoma mimicking malignancy and presenting as an intussusception: A rare case report.

本文引用的文献

1
Anatomy of the transverse colon revisited with respect to complete mesocolic excision and possible pathways of aberrant lymphatic tumor spread.关于完整结肠系膜切除术及异常淋巴肿瘤扩散可能途径对横结肠解剖的再探讨。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;31(2):377-84. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2434-0. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
2
Morphometric analysis and lymph node yield in laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision performed by supervised trainees.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的形态计量分析和淋巴结产量。
Br J Surg. 2014 Oct;101(11):1460-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9602. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
3
Increasing the number of lymph nodes examined after colectomy does not improve colon cancer staging.
酷似恶性肿瘤并表现为肠套叠的结肠脂肪瘤:一例罕见病例报告。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Aug;109:108611. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108611. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
4
Equivalent Operative Outcomes for Emergency Colon Cancer Resections Among Acute Care Surgeons and Specialists in Colorectal Surgery.急性护理外科医生和结直肠外科专家行急诊结肠癌切除术的手术结局相当。
Am Surg. 2022 May;88(5):959-963. doi: 10.1177/00031348211050820. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
5
Predictive Factors of Positive Circumferential and Longitudinal Margins in Early T3 Colorectal Cancer Resection.早期T3期结直肠癌切除术中环周和纵向切缘阳性的预测因素
Int J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun 27;2020:6789709. doi: 10.1155/2020/6789709. eCollection 2020.
6
Should there be a specific length of the colon-rectum segment to be resected for an adequate number of lymph nodes in cases of colorectal cancers? A retrospective multi-center study.在结直肠癌病例中,为获取足够数量的淋巴结,是否需要有特定长度的结肠直肠段进行切除?一项回顾性多中心研究。
Turk J Surg. 2020 Mar 18;36(1):23-32. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4550. eCollection 2020 Mar.
7
The effect of pericolic lymph nodes metastasis beyond 10 cm proximal to the tumor on patients with rectal cancer.肿瘤近端 10cm 以外的结肠旁淋巴结转移对直肠癌患者的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07037-3.
8
Codonopis bulleynana Forest ex Diels inhibits autophagy and induces apoptosis of colon cancer cells by activating the NF-κB signaling pathway.圆叶风铃草通过激活 NF-κB 信号通路抑制自噬并诱导结肠癌细胞凋亡。
Int J Mol Med. 2018 Mar;41(3):1305-1314. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3337. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
结肠切除术后增加检查的淋巴结数量并不会改善结肠癌分期。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May;218(5):1004-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.039. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
4
Quantification of tissue shrinkage in canine small intestinal specimens after resection and fixation.犬小肠标本切除并固定后组织收缩的量化分析
Can J Vet Res. 2014 Jan;78(1):46-9.
5
Nodal status, number of lymph nodes examined, and lymph node ratio: what defines prognosis after resection of colon adenocarcinoma?淋巴结状态、检查的淋巴结数量和淋巴结比率:切除结肠癌后,哪些因素决定预后?
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):1090-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.404. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
6
Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon.与标准结肠癌手术相比,完整的结肠系膜切除术联合中央血管结扎可提供具有更好肿瘤学效果的标本。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):272-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1448. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
7
Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome.结肠癌标准化手术:完整结肠系膜切除及中央结扎——技术要点与结果
Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;11(4):354-64; discussion 364-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01735.x. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
8
Colorectal cancer.结直肠癌
Lancet. 2005;365(9454):153-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17706-X.
9
A study of the lengthening and contractility of the surgical margins in digestive tract cancer.消化道癌手术切缘长度及收缩性的研究
Am J Surg. 2004 Mar;187(3):452-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.006.
10
Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery.2000年结直肠癌手术指南。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Apr 18;93(8):583-96. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.8.583.