• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院青少年的群体催眠易感性

Group Hypnotizability Of Inpatient Adolescents.

作者信息

Quant Michael, Schilder Steffanie, Sapp Marty, Zhang Bo, Baskin Thomas, Arndt Leah Rouse

机构信息

a University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee , Milwaukee , Wisconsin , USA.

b Loras College , Dubuque , Iowa , USA.

出版信息

Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2017 Jan-Mar;65(1):18-31. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2017.1246851.

DOI:10.1080/00207144.2017.1246851
PMID:27935458
Abstract

This study investigated group hypnotizability in 167 adolescents (ages 13-17) in an inpatient behavioral healthcare setting through use of the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale, Form C. It also investigated the influence of hypnotic inductions on group hypnotizability. Adolescents were randomly assigned to either a group session of hypnosis (n = 84) with a hypnotic induction or a comparison "no-induction" group (n = 83) that received identical suggestions without a hypnotic induction. Adolescents' imaginative absorption and dissociation were measured to examine their influence on hypnotizability. A between-group comparison showed the induction condition had a significantly higher score than the no-induction group on both behavioral and subjective measures of hypnotizability.

摘要

本研究通过使用滑铁卢 - 斯坦福团体量表C型,对167名年龄在13至17岁的青少年在住院行为医疗环境中的团体催眠感受性进行了调查。同时还研究了催眠诱导对团体催眠感受性的影响。青少年被随机分为接受催眠诱导的催眠团体治疗组(n = 84)或接受相同建议但无催眠诱导的对照“无诱导”组(n = 83)。测量了青少年的想象性专注和分离,以检验它们对催眠感受性的影响。组间比较显示,在催眠感受性的行为和主观测量方面,诱导组的得分显著高于无诱导组。

相似文献

1
Group Hypnotizability Of Inpatient Adolescents.住院青少年的群体催眠易感性
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2017 Jan-Mar;65(1):18-31. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2017.1246851.
2
The predictive utility of hypnotizability: the change in suggestibility produced by hypnosis.催眠易感性的预测效用:催眠产生的暗示性变化。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Feb;78(1):126-30. doi: 10.1037/a0017388.
3
Chaos-chaos transition of left hemisphere EEGs during standard tasks of Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility.在滑铁卢-斯坦福催眠易感性量表的标准任务期间左半球脑电图的混沌-混沌转变
J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39(5):281-5. doi: 10.3109/03091902.2015.1048317. Epub 2015 May 22.
4
Potential Effect of Repetitive Hypnotic Inductions on Subjectively Rated Hypnotizability: A Brief Report.重复催眠诱导对主观催眠感受性的潜在影响:简要报告。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2020 Jul-Sep;68(3):400-408. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2020.1747939. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
5
Effects of Prehypnotic Instructions on Hypnotizability and Relationships Between Hypnotizability, Absorption, and Empathy.催眠前指令对催眠感受性的影响以及催眠感受性、专注性和共情之间的关系。
Am J Clin Hypn. 2020 Jan;62(3):231-266. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2019.1586639.
6
The relation of self-reports of hypnotic depth in self-hypnosis to hypnotizability and imagery production.自我催眠中催眠深度的自我报告与催眠感受性及意象产生的关系。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1989 Oct;37(4):290-304. doi: 10.1080/00207148908414484.
7
Suggestibility or hypnosis: what do our scales really measure?易受暗示性或催眠:我们的量表究竟测量的是什么?
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1997 Jul;45(3):212-25. doi: 10.1080/00207149708416124.
8
Is Hypnotic Induction Necessary to Experience Hypnosis and Responsible for Changes in Brain Activity?催眠诱导对于体验催眠以及引起大脑活动变化是否必要?
Brain Sci. 2023 May 29;13(6):875. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060875.
9
A Comparison of Hypnotic Induction, Task Motivation, and a "Cold Start" Control Group on Hypnotizability.催眠诱导、任务动机与“冷启动”对照组对催眠易感性的比较
Am J Clin Hypn. 2016 Oct;59(2):214-30. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2016.1200960.
10
Transcultural Factors in Hypnotizability Scales: Limits and Prospects.催眠易感性量表中的跨文化因素:局限与前景
Am J Clin Hypn. 2015 Oct;58(2):171-94. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2015.1061473.