Department of Psychotherapy, Jagiellonian University Medical College , Krakow, Poland.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2020 Jul-Sep;68(3):400-408. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2020.1747939. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
This study aimed to describe the potential influence of repetitive hypnotic inductions on hypnotizability, presentation of change dynamics, and comparison of 2 types of assessment. Six subjects underwent 5 subsequent hypnotic procedures. Ratings of response to hypnotic suggestions included self ratings by subjects and ratings by observers. The suggestion effects were evaluated using a 0-to-3 rating scale. Five out of 6 subjects were susceptible to suggestions; 1 was not responsive. Increase or stability, not decrease, were observed within subsequent procedures. The hypnotizability ratings increased significantly in subjects' assessment. However, there was an insignificant change in observers' assessment. Repetitive hypnotic inductions may modulate subjectively rated hypnotizability. Behavioral responses do not precisely reflect subjective experiences in the state of hypnosis.
本研究旨在描述重复催眠诱导对催眠易感性、变化动态呈现以及两种评估类型比较的潜在影响。6 名受试者接受了 5 次后续催眠程序。对催眠暗示反应的评估包括受试者的自我评估和观察者的评估。建议效果使用 0 到 3 的评分量表进行评估。5 名受试者对建议敏感，1 名受试者无反应。在随后的程序中观察到增加或稳定，而不是减少。受试者的催眠易感性评分在评估中显著增加。然而，观察者评估没有显著变化。重复催眠诱导可能会调节主观评估的催眠易感性。行为反应并不完全反映催眠状态下的主观体验。
