Suppr超能文献

在美国,速释型阿片类镇痛药与缓释剂型相比的滥用和转移情况。

Abuse and Diversion of Immediate Release Opioid Analgesics as Compared to Extended Release Formulations in the United States.

作者信息

Iwanicki Janetta L, Severtson S Geoff, McDaniel Heather, Rosenblum Andrew, Fong Chunki, Cicero Theodore J, Ellis Matthew S, Kurtz Steven P, Buttram Mance E, Dart Richard C

机构信息

Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.

National Development and Research Institutes, Incorporated, New York, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0167499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167499. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic use and abuse of prescription opioids in the United States increased substantially between 1990 and 2010. The Centers for Disease Control estimated deaths related to pharmaceutical opioids reached nearly 19,000 in 2014. Of prescription opioids sold, 10% are extended release (ER) and 90% immediate release (IR). However, most regulations and interventions have focused on decreasing ER abuse. Our objective was to compare rates of abuse and diversion of ER and IR opioid analgesics over time using multiple surveillance programs.

METHODS

Rates of abuse and diversion of ER and IR opioid formulations were compared using data from four surveillance programs in the Researched Abuse, Diversion and Addiction Related Surveillance (RADARS®) System. Data were evaluated from 2009 through 2015, and Poisson regression used to compare IR and ER opioid cases over time.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2015, IR opioids were prescribed at a rate 12 to 16 times higher than ER. In the Poison Center Program, population-adjusted rates of Intentional Abuse for IR were 4.6 fold higher than ER opioids (p<0.001). In the Drug Diversion Program, population-adjusted rates of diversion were 6.1 fold higher for IR than ER opioids (p<0.001). In the Opioid Treatment Program, population-adjusted rates of endorsements for abuse were 1.6 fold higher for IR opioids than ER (p = 0.002). In the Survey of Key Informants' Patients Program, population-adjusted rates of endorsements for abuse were 1.5 fold higher for IR opioids than ER (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2009 and 2015, IR opioids were prescribed at a much higher rate than ER opioids. Results from four surveillance programs show population-adjusted rates of prescription opioid abuse were markedly higher for IR than ER medications. For the greatest public health benefit, future interventions to decrease prescription opioid abuse should focus on both IR and ER formulations.

摘要

背景

1990年至2010年间,美国处方类阿片类药物的治疗性使用和滥用显著增加。疾病控制中心估计,2014年与药用阿片类药物相关的死亡人数接近19000人。在售出的处方类阿片类药物中,10%为缓释剂型(ER),90%为速释剂型(IR)。然而,大多数法规和干预措施都集中在减少缓释剂型的滥用上。我们的目标是通过多个监测项目,比较随时间推移缓释和速释阿片类镇痛药的滥用和转移率。

方法

使用研究性滥用、转移和成瘾相关监测(RADARS®)系统中的四个监测项目的数据,比较缓释和速释阿片类药物制剂的滥用和转移率。对2009年至2015年的数据进行评估,并使用泊松回归比较不同时间的速释和缓释阿片类药物病例。

结果

2009年至2015年期间,速释阿片类药物的处方率比缓释阿片类药物高12至16倍。在中毒控制中心项目中,速释阿片类药物的人群调整后故意滥用率比缓释阿片类药物高4.6倍(p<0.001)。在药物转移项目中,速释阿片类药物的人群调整后转移率比缓释阿片类药物高6.1倍(p<0.001)。在阿片类药物治疗项目中,速释阿片类药物的人群调整后滥用认可率比缓释阿片类药物高1.6倍(p = 0.002)。在关键信息提供者患者调查项目中,速释阿片类药物的人群调整后滥用认可率比缓释阿片类药物高1.5倍(p<0.001)。

结论

2009年至2015年期间,速释阿片类药物的处方率远高于缓释阿片类药物。四个监测项目的结果显示,速释阿片类药物的人群调整后处方阿片类药物滥用率明显高于缓释药物。为了获得最大的公共卫生效益,未来减少处方阿片类药物滥用的干预措施应同时关注速释和缓释剂型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf6f/5147916/2af6ad294543/pone.0167499.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验