Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, St. Hedwig Hospital Berlin, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 26;14(9):e0223118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223118. eCollection 2019.
Multi-substance use is accompanied by increased morbidity and mortality and responsible for a large number of emergency department (ED) consultations. To improve the treatment for this vulnerable group of patients, it is important to quantify and break down in detail the ED resources used during the ED treatment of multi-substance users.
This retrospective single centre case-control study included all ED consultations of multi-substance users over a three-year study period at a university hospital in Switzerland. Resource consumption of these patients was compared to an age-matched control group of non-multi-substance users.
The analysis includes 867 ED consultations of multi-substance users compared to 4,335 age-matched controls (5:1). Multi-substance users needed more total resources (median tax points [medical currency] (IQR): 762 (459-1226) vs. 462 (196-833), p<0.001), especially physician, radiology, and laboratory resources. This difference persisted in multivariable analysis (geometric mean ratio (GMR) 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.3, p = 0.001) adjusted for sociodemographic parameters, consultation characteristics, and patient comorbidity; the GMR was highest in ED laboratory and radiology resource consumption. Among multi-substance user, indirect and non-drug-related consultations had higher ED resource consumption compared to drug-related consultations. Furthermore, leading discipline as well as urgency were predictors of ED resource consumption. Moreover, multi-substance users had more revisits (55.2% vs. 24.9%, p<0.001) as well as longer ED and in-hospital stays (both: GMR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.3, p<0.001).
ED consultations of multi-substance users are expensive and resource intensive. Multi-substance users visited the ED more often and stayed longer at the ED and in-hospital. The findings of our study underline the importance of this patient group. Additional efforts should be made to improve their ED care. Special interventions should target this patient group in order to decrease the high frequency and costs of emergency consultations caused by multi-substance users.
多物质使用伴随着发病率和死亡率的增加,并导致大量急诊部(ED)就诊。为了改善这群弱势群体的治疗效果,量化并详细分析多物质使用者在 ED 治疗过程中使用的 ED 资源非常重要。
本研究为回顾性单中心病例对照研究,纳入了瑞士一所大学医院三年内多物质使用者的所有 ED 就诊。将这些患者的资源消耗与年龄匹配的非多物质使用者对照组进行比较。
该分析包括 867 例多物质使用者的 ED 就诊和 4335 例年龄匹配的对照组(5:1)。多物质使用者需要更多的总资源(中位数税点[医疗货币](IQR):762(459-1226)比 462(196-833),p<0.001),特别是医生、放射科和实验室资源。在多变量分析中,这种差异仍然存在(几何平均比(GMR)1.2,95%CI:1.1-1.3,p=0.001),调整了社会人口统计学参数、就诊特征和患者合并症;在 ED 实验室和放射学资源消耗方面,GMR 最高。在多物质使用者中,与药物相关的就诊相比,间接和非药物相关的就诊消耗了更多的 ED 资源。此外,主要学科和紧急程度是 ED 资源消耗的预测因素。此外,多物质使用者的复诊率更高(55.2%比 24.9%,p<0.001),ED 停留时间和住院时间更长(均为 GMR 1.2,95%CI:1.1-1.3,p<0.001)。
多物质使用者的 ED 就诊费用昂贵且资源密集。多物质使用者更频繁地就诊于 ED,在 ED 和住院期间停留时间更长。我们研究的结果强调了这群患者的重要性。应做出额外努力以改善他们的 ED 护理。应针对该患者群体采取特殊干预措施,以减少多物质使用者因急诊就诊而导致的高频次和高成本。