Keevil Stephen F, Lomas David J
1 Department of Medical Physics, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Br J Radiol. 2017 Feb;90(1070):20160813. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160813. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
This short commentary provides the MRI community in the UK with practical advice on the impact of the Control of Electromagnetic Fields at Work Regulations 2016 in clinical and research settings. The regulations are the UK implementation of the European Union Physical Agents (Electromagnetic Fields) Directive, which has been the subject of much discussion and concern over the past 13 years. However, thanks to concessions achieved through negotiation, and sensible and proportionate transposition into UK law by the Health and Safety Executive, the negative consequences that were foreseen have been averted. MRI activities are exempt from the occupational exposure limits contained in the regulations, subject to meeting certain conditions. The commentary gives advice on compliance with these conditions and on how to satisfy the other requirements of the regulations, all of which are either already required under existing legislation or represent good MR safety practice.
本简短评论为英国的MRI界提供了关于2016年《工作场所电磁场控制法规》在临床和研究环境中的影响的实用建议。这些法规是英国对欧盟《物理因素(电磁场)指令》的实施,在过去13年里一直是大量讨论和关注的主题。然而,由于通过谈判达成的让步,以及健康与安全执行局明智且适度地将其转化为英国法律,预期的负面后果得以避免。MRI活动在满足某些条件的情况下可免于该法规中规定的职业接触限值。该评论就如何符合这些条件以及如何满足法规的其他要求提供了建议,所有这些要求要么已经是现行立法所要求的,要么代表了良好的MR安全实践。