• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在健康的老年人中,进行有或没有同步认知训练的平衡和移动训练不会改善姿势,但会改善反应时间。

Balance and mobility training with or without concurrent cognitive training does not improve posture, but improves reaction time in healthy older adults.

作者信息

Jehu Deborah, Paquet Nicole, Lajoie Yves

机构信息

School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Canada.

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2017 Feb;52:227-232. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.12.006
PMID:27939652
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The purpose was to determine whether balance and mobility training (BMT) or balance and mobility plus cognitive training (BMT+C) would reduce postural sway and reaction time (RT) and maintain these improvements after a 12-week follow-up in healthy older adults.

METHODS

Participants were allocated to the BMT (n=15; age: 70.2±3.2), BMT+C (n=14; age:68.7±5.5), or control group (n=13; age: 66.7±4.2). The BMT group trained one-on-one, 3×/wk for 12 weeks on a balance obstacle course. The BMT+C group trained one-on-one, 3×/week for 12 weeks on a balance obstacle course while completing cognitive tasks. Participants stood on a force plate for 30s in feet-apart (FA) and semi-tandem (ST) positions while completing simple RT and choice RT tasks at baseline, at the 12-week post-training, and at the 12-week follow-up. Participants were instructed to stand as still as possible while verbally responding as fast as possible to the auditory cues.

RESULTS

No group differences in center of pressure (COP) Area, COP Velocity, or Sample Entropy of the COP displacement were shown after the training or 12-week follow-up, but the BMT and BMT+C showed faster RT after training and maintained these improvements at the 12-week follow-up compared to the control group. No differences in postural sway or RT emerged between the BMT and BMT+C groups.

CONCLUSION

Both training groups improved RT after the interventions and sustained these improvements over 12 weeks, but showed no reductions in postural sway. Multi-task balance training likely results in reduced attention demand.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在确定平衡与移动训练(BMT)或平衡与移动加认知训练(BMT+C)是否能减少健康老年人的姿势摆动和反应时间(RT),并在12周的随访后维持这些改善。

方法

参与者被分配到BMT组(n=15;年龄:70.2±3.2)、BMT+C组(n=14;年龄:68.7±5.5)或对照组(n=13;年龄:66.7±4.2)。BMT组在平衡障碍课程上进行一对一训练,每周3次,共12周。BMT+C组在平衡障碍课程上进行一对一训练,每周3次,共12周,同时完成认知任务。参与者在双脚分开(FA)和半串联(ST)姿势下站在测力板上30秒,同时在基线、训练后12周和12周随访时完成简单RT和选择RT任务。参与者被指示尽可能安静地站立,同时对听觉提示尽快做出口头反应。

结果

训练或12周随访后,压力中心(COP)面积、COP速度或COP位移的样本熵在各组之间均无差异,但与对照组相比,BMT组和BMT+C组在训练后RT更快,并在12周随访时维持了这些改善。BMT组和BMT+C组在姿势摆动或RT方面没有差异。

结论

两个训练组在干预后均改善了RT,并在12周内维持了这些改善,但姿势摆动没有减少。多任务平衡训练可能会减少注意力需求。

相似文献

1
Balance and mobility training with or without concurrent cognitive training does not improve posture, but improves reaction time in healthy older adults.在健康的老年人中,进行有或没有同步认知训练的平衡和移动训练不会改善姿势,但会改善反应时间。
Gait Posture. 2017 Feb;52:227-232. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
2
Balance and Mobility Training With or Without Simultaneous Cognitive Training Reduces Attention Demand But Does Not Improve Obstacle Clearance in Older Adults.有或没有同时进行认知训练的平衡与移动训练可减少老年人的注意力需求,但不会改善其跨越障碍的能力。
Motor Control. 2018 Jul 1;22(3):275-294. doi: 10.1123/mc.2017-0024. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
3
Balance and mobility training with or without concurrent cognitive training improves the timed up and go (TUG), TUG cognitive, and TUG manual in healthy older adults: an exploratory study.在健康老年人中,进行有或没有同时进行认知训练的平衡和移动训练可改善计时起立行走测试(TUG)、TUG认知测试和TUG手动测试:一项探索性研究。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Aug;29(4):711-720. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0618-2. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
4
Examining the stability of dual-task posture and reaction time measures in older adults over five sessions: a pilot study.一项初步研究:考察老年人在五个阶段中双重任务姿势和反应时间测量的稳定性。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016 Dec;28(6):1211-1218. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0513-2. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
5
Combined physical-cognitive training enhances postural performances during daily life tasks in older adults.联合躯体认知训练可增强老年人日常生活任务中的姿势表现。
Exp Gerontol. 2018 Jul 1;107:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
6
Continuous and difficult discrete cognitive tasks promote improved stability in older adults.持续且具有挑战性的离散认知任务有助于提高老年人的稳定性。
Gait Posture. 2017 Jun;55:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
7
Prioritizing attention on a reaction time task improves postural control and reaction time.在反应时间任务上优先分配注意力可改善姿势控制和反应时间。
Int J Neurosci. 2015 Feb;125(2):100-6. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2014.907573. Epub 2014 May 8.
8
Benefits of multi-session balance and gait training with multi-modal biofeedback in healthy older adults.多节段平衡与步态训练结合多模态生物反馈对健康老年人的益处。
Gait Posture. 2016 Jun;47:10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.03.017. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
9
Cognitive tasks promote automatization of postural control in young and older adults.认知任务可促进年轻人和老年人姿势控制的自动化。
Gait Posture. 2017 Sep;57:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
The effect of age on postural and cognitive task performance while using vibrotactile feedback.年龄对使用振动触觉反馈时姿势和认知任务表现的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr 1;113(7):2127-36. doi: 10.1152/jn.00083.2014. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing acute effects of two motor-cognitive training modalities on cognitive functions, postural control, and gait stability in older adults: a randomized crossover study.评估两种运动认知训练模式对老年人认知功能、姿势控制和步态稳定性的急性影响:一项随机交叉研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Oct 21;12:e18306. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18306. eCollection 2024.
2
The Effect of Tactile Imagery Training on Reaction Time in Healthy Participants.触觉意象训练对健康参与者反应时间的影响。
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 14;13(2):321. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020321.
3
Neural Bases of Age-Related Sensorimotor Slowing in the Upper and Lower Limbs.
上下肢与年龄相关的感觉运动迟缓的神经基础
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 May 3;14:819576. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.819576. eCollection 2022.
4
Effects of a Modified Tap Dance Program on Ankle Function and Postural Control in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.改良踢踏舞方案对老年人踝关节功能和姿势控制的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 12;18(12):6379. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126379.
5
Effects of a Multicomponent Exercise Program on Groups of Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Low Schooling: A Pilot Study.多组分运动计划对低学历社区居住老年人组的影响:一项试点研究。
J Aging Res. 2021 Jun 3;2021:8829332. doi: 10.1155/2021/8829332. eCollection 2021.
6
Effects of Ballroom Dance on Physical Fitness and Reaction Time in Experienced Middle-Aged Adults of Both Genders.交谊舞对中老年两性成年人身体素质和反应时间的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):2036. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042036.
7
Effects of 8 Weeks of Balance Training, Virtual Reality Training, and Combined Exercise on Lower Limb Muscle Strength, Balance, and Functional Mobility Among Older Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial.8 周平衡训练、虚拟现实训练和联合运动对老年男性下肢肌肉力量、平衡和功能移动性的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Sports Health. 2021 Nov-Dec;13(6):606-612. doi: 10.1177/1941738120986803. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
8
Asymptomatic carotid stenosis is associated with mobility and cognitive dysfunction and heightens falls in older adults.无症状性颈动脉狭窄与老年人的活动能力和认知功能障碍有关,并增加其跌倒的风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jun;71(6):1930-1937. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.09.020. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
9
Motor-cognitive dual-task performance of older women evaluated using Wii Balance Board.使用 Wii 平衡板评估老年女性的运动认知双重任务表现。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 May;32(5):907-912. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01270-y. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
10
Cognitive Involvement in Balance, Gait and Dual-Tasking in Aging: A Focused Review From a Neuroscience of Aging Perspective.衰老过程中认知对平衡、步态及双重任务的影响:基于衰老神经科学视角的重点综述
Front Neurol. 2018 Oct 29;9:913. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00913. eCollection 2018.