Suppr超能文献

MindSurf:一项试点研究,旨在评估一款旨在促进满足感、幸福感和目标实现的智能手机应用程序的可用性和可接受性。

MindSurf: a pilot study to assess the usability and acceptability of a smartphone app designed to promote contentment, wellbeing, and goal achievement.

作者信息

Carey Timothy A, Haviland Jennifer, Tai Sara J, Vanags Thea, Mansell Warren

机构信息

Centre for Remote Health, a joint centre of Flinders University and Charles Darwin University, PO Box 4066, Alice Springs, NT, 0871, Australia.

School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 12;16(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1168-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Method of Levels (MOL) is a transdiagnostic cognitive therapy that promotes contentment, wellbeing, and goal achievement through the resolution of internal conflicts underlying psychological distress. MOL, based on Perceptual Control Theory (PCT), was developed in routine clinical practice and has been used effectively across different health services by different practitioners. Access to MOL-style questions through a smartphone app could, potentially, help both the general public maintain robust mental health, and also be a useful adjunct to therapy for clinical populations. The app is called MindSurf because of its focus on helping people explore their thinking. Prior to developing the app and using it with different populations it was necessary to determine whether such an idea would be usable for and acceptable to potential app users. Therefore, a pilot study was conducted with a non-clinical sample to assess the usability and acceptability of the app including monitoring whether the questions delivered in this way were associated with any adverse events.

METHODS

A pilot study using quantitative as well as qualitative methods and incorporating a repeated measures, A-B design was conducted.

RESULTS

The 23 participants were healthy adult volunteers who were all either undergraduate students, postgraduate students, or staff of the University of Manchester. They received MOL-style questions on their mobile phones over a 1-week period. Qualitative results were encouraging and indicated that the format and style of questioning were acceptable to participants and did not lead to increased worry or concern. A one-way, repeated measures ANOVA indicated that there was a nonsignificant decrease in scores on the 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS21) over a 2 week period.

DISCUSSION

The results of the pilot study justified development of MindSurf and further testing once it is available for use. A power analysis indicated that the pilot study was underpowered to detect significant effects but provided important information regarding the appropriate sample size for future research. The pilot study also indicated that future research should investigate the effects of receiving more than three questions per day.

CONCLUSION

Results of the pilot study indicate that MindSurf will be a usable and acceptable app. Its benefits should be further explored through longer studies with larger sample of both the general population as well as clinical populations.

摘要

背景

层次法(MOL)是一种跨诊断认知疗法,通过解决心理困扰背后的内部冲突来促进满足感、幸福感和目标实现。基于感知控制理论(PCT)的层次法是在常规临床实践中发展起来的,不同的从业者已在不同的医疗服务中有效地使用了该方法。通过智能手机应用程序获取层次法风格的问题,可能有助于普通大众保持强大的心理健康,同时也是临床人群治疗的有用辅助手段。该应用程序名为MindSurf,因为它专注于帮助人们探索自己的思维。在开发该应用程序并将其用于不同人群之前,有必要确定这样的想法对于潜在的应用程序用户是否可用且可接受。因此,对一个非临床样本进行了一项试点研究,以评估该应用程序的可用性和可接受性,包括监测以这种方式提供的问题是否与任何不良事件相关。

方法

进行了一项采用定量和定性方法并纳入重复测量A - B设计的试点研究。

结果

23名参与者是健康的成年志愿者,他们均为曼彻斯特大学的本科生、研究生或工作人员。他们在1周的时间内通过手机接收层次法风格的问题。定性结果令人鼓舞,表明提问的形式和风格为参与者所接受,且未导致担忧或关注增加。单向重复测量方差分析表明,在2周的时间内,21项抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS21)的得分有不显著的下降。

讨论

试点研究的结果证明了开发MindSurf并在其可供使用后进行进一步测试的合理性。功效分析表明,试点研究检测显著效应的功效不足,但提供了有关未来研究合适样本量的重要信息。试点研究还表明,未来的研究应调查每天接收超过三个问题的影响。

结论

试点研究的结果表明MindSurf将是一个可用且可接受的应用程序。其益处应通过对普通人群和临床人群的更大样本进行更长时间的研究来进一步探索。

相似文献

3
A Pilot Evaluation of a Smartphone Application for Workplace Depression.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 16;17(18):6753. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186753.
6
A consumer designed smartphone app for young people with asthma: pilot of engagement and acceptability.
J Asthma. 2021 Feb;58(2):253-261. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1680997. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
9
The Utility of a Mental Health App in Apprentice Workers: A Pilot Study.
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 4;8:389. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00389. eCollection 2020.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of evidence based mental health apps on user health outcome: A systematic literature review.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0319983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319983. eCollection 2025.
6
Understanding what we know so far about young people's engagement with wellbeing apps. A scoping review and narrative synthesis.
Digit Health. 2022 Dec 14;8:20552076221144104. doi: 10.1177/20552076221144104. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
7
COVID-19 smart surveillance: Examination of Knowledge of Apps and mobile thermometer detectors (MTDs) in a high-risk society.
Digit Health. 2022 Nov 17;8:20552076221132092. doi: 10.1177/20552076221132092. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
10
Exploring Social Media Recruitment Strategies and Preliminary Acceptability of an mHealth Tool for Teens with Eating Disorders.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 28;18(15):7979. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157979.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying App Store Dynamics: Longitudinal Tracking of Mental Health Apps.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Aug 9;4(3):e96. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6020.
4
Using Smartphone Apps to Promote Psychiatric and Physical Well-Being.
Psychiatr Q. 2015 Dec;86(4):505-19. doi: 10.1007/s11126-015-9337-7.
5
Smartphones for smarter delivery of mental health programs: a systematic review.
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Nov 15;15(11):e247. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2791.
6
Mapping mHealth research: a decade of evolution.
J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 21;15(5):e95. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2430.
7
Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management.
Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32(1):56-69. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxq004. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
8
Assessing the statistical and personal significance of the method of levels.
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2009 May;37(3):311-24. doi: 10.1017/S1352465809005232. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验