Schibille Nadine, Meek Andrew, Tobias Bendeguz, Entwistle Chris, Avisseau-Broustet Mathilde, Da Mota Henrique, Gratuze Bernard
IRAMAT-CEB, UMR 5060, CNRS, Orléans, France.
Department of Scientific Research, The British Museum, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 13;11(12):e0168289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168289. eCollection 2016.
The understanding of the glass trade in the first millennium CE relies on the characterisation of well-dated compositional groups and the identification of their primary production sites. 275 Byzantine glass weights from the British Museum and the Bibliothèque nationale de France dating to the sixth and seventh century were analysed by LA-ICP-MS. Multivariate statistical and graphical data analysis discriminated between six main primary glass types. Primary glass sources were differentiated based on multi-dimensional comparison of silica-derived elements (MgO, Al2O3, CaO, TiO2, Fe2O3, ZrO2) and components associated with the alkali source (Li2O, B2O3). Along with Egyptian and Levantine origins of the glassmaking sands, variations in the natron source possibly point to the exploitation of two different natron deposits. Differences in strontium to calcium ratios revealed variations in the carbonate fractions in the sand. At least two cobalt sources were employed as colouring agents, one of which shows strong correlations with nickel, indicating a specific post-Roman cobalt source. Typological evidence identified chronological developments in the use of the different glass groups. Throughout the sixth century, Byzantine glass weights were predominately produced from two glasses that are probably of an Egyptian origin (Foy-2 and Foy-2 high Fe). Towards the second half of the sixth century a new but related plant-ash glass type emerged (Magby). Levantine I was likewise found among the late sixth- to early seventh-century samples. The use of different dies for the same batch testifies to large-scale, centralised production of the weights, while the same die used for different primary production groups demonstrates the co-existence of alternative sources of supply. Given the comprehensive design of our study, these results can be extrapolated to the wider early Byzantine glass industry and its changes at large.
对公元一千年玻璃贸易的理解依赖于对年代确定的成分组的特征描述及其主要生产地点的识别。对大英博物馆和法国国家图书馆收藏的275件可追溯到公元6至7世纪的拜占庭玻璃砝码进行了激光烧蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱(LA-ICP-MS)分析。多变量统计和图形数据分析区分出六种主要的原生玻璃类型。基于二氧化硅衍生元素(MgO、Al2O3、CaO、TiO2、Fe2O3、ZrO2)和与碱源相关成分(Li2O、B2O3)的多维比较,区分了原生玻璃来源。除了玻璃制造用砂的埃及和黎凡特产地外,天然碱来源的变化可能表明开采了两种不同的天然碱矿床。锶钙比的差异揭示了砂中碳酸盐含量的变化。至少使用了两种钴源作为着色剂,其中一种与镍有很强的相关性,表明是罗马时代之后的一种特定钴源。类型学证据确定了不同玻璃组使用的时间发展。在整个6世纪,拜占庭玻璃砝码主要由两种可能源自埃及的玻璃制成(Foy-2和Foy-2高铁)。到6世纪下半叶,出现了一种新的但相关的植物灰玻璃类型(Magby)。在6世纪末至7世纪初的样本中也发现了黎凡特I型玻璃。同一批次使用不同模具证明了砝码的大规模集中生产,而不同原生生产组使用相同模具则表明存在替代供应源。鉴于我们研究的全面设计,这些结果可以推广到更广泛的早期拜占庭玻璃工业及其总体变化。