Martin Colin R, Hollins Martin Caroline J, Burduli Ekaterina, Barbosa-Leiker Celestina, Donovan-Batson Colleen, Fleming Susan E
Faculty of Society and Health, Buckinghamshire New University, Uxbridge, UB8 1NA, UK.
School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Scotland, EH11 4BN, UK.
Women Birth. 2017 Aug;30(4):e172-e178. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
The 10-item Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) is being increasingly used internationally. The use of the measure and the concept has gathered traction in the United States following the development of a US version of the tool. A limitation of previous studies of the measurement characteristics of the BSS-R is modest sample size. Unplanned pregnancy is recognised as being associated with a range of negative birth outcomes, but the relationship to birth satisfaction has received little attention, despite the importance of birth satisfaction to a range of postnatal outcomes.
The current investigation sought to evaluate the measurement characteristics of the BSS-R in a large postpartum sample.
Multiple Groups Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) was used to evaluate a series of measurement and structural models of the BSS-R to evaluate fundamental invariance characteristics using planned/unplanned pregnancy status to differentiate groups.
Complete data from N=2116 women revealed that the US version of the BSS-R offers an excellent fit to data and demonstrates full measurement and structural invariance. Little difference was observed between women on the basis of planned/unplanned pregnancy stratification on measures of birth satisfaction.
The established relationship between unplanned pregnancy and negative perinatal outcomes was not found to extend to birth satisfaction in the current study. The BSS-R demonstrated exemplary measurement and structural invariance characteristics.
The current study strongly supports the use of the US version of the BSS-R to compare birth satisfaction across different groups of women with theoretical and measurement confidence.
10项修订版分娩满意度量表(BSS-R)在国际上的使用越来越广泛。在美国,随着该工具美国版本的开发,对这一测量方法和概念的使用越来越受到关注。以往对BSS-R测量特征研究的一个局限性是样本量较小。意外怀孕被认为与一系列不良分娩结局相关,但尽管分娩满意度对一系列产后结局很重要,其与分娩满意度的关系却很少受到关注。
本研究旨在评估BSS-R在一个大型产后样本中的测量特征。
采用多组验证性因素分析(MGCFA)来评估BSS-R的一系列测量和结构模型,以使用计划内/计划外怀孕状态来区分组,从而评估基本不变性特征。
来自N = 2116名女性的完整数据显示,BSS-R的美国版本与数据拟合良好,并显示出完全的测量和结构不变性。在基于计划内/计划外怀孕分层的分娩满意度测量方面,女性之间几乎没有差异。
在本研究中,未发现意外怀孕与不良围产期结局之间已确立的关系延伸至分娩满意度。BSS-R表现出了出色的测量和结构不变性特征。
本研究强烈支持使用BSS-R的美国版本,以理论和测量可信度在不同女性群体之间比较分娩满意度。