Smith Muireann K, Draper Lorraine A, Hazelhoff Pieter-Jan, Cotter Paul D, Ross R P, Hill Colin
APC Microbiome Institute, School of Microbiology, University College Cork Cork, Ireland.
Wageningen University & Research Wageningen, Netherlands.
Front Microbiol. 2016 Nov 30;7:1939. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01939. eCollection 2016.
The burden of foodborne disease has large economic and social consequences worldwide. Despite strict regulations, a number of pathogens persist within the food environment, which is greatly contributed to by a build-up of resistance mechanisms and also through the formation of biofilms. Biofilms have been shown to be highly resistant to a number of antimicrobials and can be extremely difficult to remove once they are established. In parallel, the growing concern of consumers regarding the use of chemically derived antimicrobials within food has led to a drive toward more natural products. As a consequence, the use of naturally derived antimicrobials has become of particular interest. In this study we investigated the efficacy of nisin A and its bioengineered derivative M21A in combination with food grade additives to treat biofilms of a representative foodborne disease isolate of . Investigations revealed the enhanced antimicrobial effects, in liquid culture, of M21A in combination with citric acid or cinnamaldehyde over its wild type nisin A counterpart. Subsequently, an investigation was conducted into the effects of these combinations on an established biofilm of the same strain. Nisin M21A (0.1 μg/ml) alone or in combination with cinnamaldehyde (35 μg/ml) or citric acid (175 μg/ml) performed significantly better than combinations involving nisin A. All combinations of M21A with either citric acid or cinnamaldehyde eradicated the biofilm (in relation to a non-biofilm control). We conclude that M21A in combination with available food additives could further enhance the antimicrobial treatment of biofilms within the food industry, simply by substituting nisin A with M21A in current commercial products such as Nisaplin (Danisco, DuPont).
食源性疾病的负担在全球范围内造成了巨大的经济和社会后果。尽管有严格的规定,但一些病原体仍在食品环境中持续存在,这在很大程度上是由于耐药机制的积累以及生物膜的形成。生物膜已被证明对多种抗菌剂具有高度抗性,一旦形成就极难去除。与此同时,消费者对食品中使用化学合成抗菌剂的日益担忧促使人们转向更天然的产品。因此,天然来源抗菌剂的使用变得格外引人关注。在本研究中,我们调查了乳酸链球菌素A及其生物工程衍生物M21A与食品级添加剂联合使用对一种代表性食源性疾病分离株生物膜的治疗效果。研究表明,在液体培养中,M21A与柠檬酸或肉桂醛联合使用时,其抗菌效果比野生型乳酸链球菌素A更强。随后,我们研究了这些组合对同一菌株已形成生物膜的影响。单独使用乳酸链球菌素M21A(0.1μg/ml)或与肉桂醛(35μg/ml)或柠檬酸(175μg/ml)联合使用时,其效果明显优于涉及乳酸链球菌素A的组合。M21A与柠檬酸或肉桂醛的所有组合均能根除生物膜(相对于非生物膜对照)。我们得出结论,M21A与现有食品添加剂联合使用,只需在当前商业产品(如Nisaplin,Danisco,DuPont)中用M21A替代乳酸链球菌素A,就可以进一步增强食品工业中生物膜的抗菌治疗效果。