Mo Hai-Lan, Li Jie, Yang Xiang, Zhang Feng, Xiong Jun-Wei, Yang Zhi-Ling, Tan Jian, Li Bing
Department of Otolaryngology, Chongqing Municipal People's Hospital, No. 104 Loquat Hill, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, People's Republic of China.
Department of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Yixueyuan Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China.
Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Feb;32(2):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2103-8. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and radiotherapy (RT) are both accepted treatment modalities for glottic cancer. The objective of the study was to assess the oncologic outcomes and life quality of TLM in comparison with RT for T1 glottic carcinoma. We searched Medline/PubMed, Web of knowledge, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Wiley online library, Springer, Google, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), etc. We screened the literature, assessed the quality of the studies, and extracted the relevant data through the establishment of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was done using the Cochrane collaboration' s RevMan 5.0 for data analysis. A total of 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The laryngeal preservation for patients undergoing TLM was significantly better than that for RT (P < 0.00). The laser surgery significantly improved the overall survival of patients with T1 glottic carcinoma (P = 0.04). No statistically significant differences were found between TLM and RT regarding the local control (P = 0.91). The funnel plot demonstrates no apparent publication bias in the overall survival and laryngeal preservation comparison. Our meta-analysis suggested that laser surgery was a preferred method than radiotherapy with respect to significantly better overall survival and laryngeal preservation. But the local control was not significant different. Further prospective randomized controlled studies will be needed.
经口激光显微手术(TLM)和放射治疗(RT)都是声门癌公认的治疗方式。本研究的目的是评估与放射治疗相比,经口激光显微手术治疗T1期声门癌的肿瘤学结局和生活质量。我们检索了Medline/PubMed、Web of knowledge、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、Wiley在线图书馆、Springer、谷歌、中国知网等。我们筛选文献,评估研究质量,并通过建立纳入和排除标准提取相关数据。使用Cochrane协作网的RevMan 5.0进行荟萃分析以进行数据分析。本荟萃分析共纳入11项研究。接受经口激光显微手术患者的喉保留率显著高于接受放射治疗的患者(P < 0.00)。激光手术显著提高了T1期声门癌患者的总生存率(P = 0.04)。在局部控制方面,经口激光显微手术和放射治疗之间未发现统计学显著差异(P = 0.91)。漏斗图显示在总生存率和喉保留率比较中无明显的发表偏倚。我们的荟萃分析表明,就显著更好的总生存率和喉保留率而言,激光手术是比放射治疗更优选的方法。但局部控制方面无显著差异。需要进一步进行前瞻性随机对照研究。