Suppr超能文献

多源变异性情况下混合效应一致性界限的应用:以几种测量慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者呼吸频率的设备比较为例

Application of Mixed Effects Limits of Agreement in the Presence of Multiple Sources of Variability: Exemplar from the Comparison of Several Devices to Measure Respiratory Rate in COPD Patients.

作者信息

Parker Richard A, Weir Christopher J, Rubio Noah, Rabinovich Roberto, Pinnock Hilary, Hanley Janet, McCloughan Lucy, Drost Ellen M, Mantoani Leandro C, MacNee William, McKinstry Brian

机构信息

Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Edinburgh Lung and the Environment Group Initiative (ELEGI), Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Dec 14;11(12):e0168321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168321. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Bland-Altman limits of agreement method is widely used to assess how well the measurements produced by two raters, devices or systems agree with each other. However, mixed effects versions of the method which take into account multiple sources of variability are less well described in the literature. We address the practical challenges of applying mixed effects limits of agreement to the comparison of several devices to measure respiratory rate in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

Respiratory rate was measured in 21 people with a range of severity of COPD. Participants were asked to perform eleven different activities representative of daily life during a laboratory-based standardised protocol of 57 minutes. A mixed effects limits of agreement method was used to assess the agreement of five commercially available monitors (Camera, Photoplethysmography (PPG), Impedance, Accelerometer, and Chest-band) with the current gold standard device for measuring respiratory rate.

RESULTS

Results produced using mixed effects limits of agreement were compared to results from a fixed effects method based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) and were found to be similar. The Accelerometer and Chest-band devices produced the narrowest limits of agreement (-8.63 to 4.27 and -9.99 to 6.80 respectively) with mean bias -2.18 and -1.60 breaths per minute. These devices also had the lowest within-participant and overall standard deviations (3.23 and 3.29 for Accelerometer and 4.17 and 4.28 for Chest-band respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The mixed effects limits of agreement analysis enabled us to answer the question of which devices showed the strongest agreement with the gold standard device with respect to measuring respiratory rates. In particular, the estimated within-participant and overall standard deviations of the differences, which are easily obtainable from the mixed effects model results, gave a clear indication that the Accelerometer and Chest-band devices performed best.

摘要

引言

布兰德-奥特曼一致性界限法被广泛用于评估两名评估者、设备或系统所产生的测量结果之间的一致性程度。然而,考虑到多种变异来源的该方法的混合效应版本在文献中的描述较少。我们解决了将混合效应一致性界限应用于比较几种用于测量慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者呼吸频率的设备时所面临的实际挑战。

方法

对21名患有不同严重程度COPD的患者测量呼吸频率。在一项基于实验室的57分钟标准化方案中,要求参与者进行11种代表日常生活的不同活动。使用混合效应一致性界限法评估五款市售监测仪(摄像头、光电容积脉搏波描记法(PPG)、阻抗、加速度计和胸带)与当前测量呼吸频率的金标准设备之间的一致性。

结果

将使用混合效应一致性界限得出的结果与基于方差分析(ANOVA)的固定效应方法得出的结果进行比较,发现两者相似。加速度计和胸带设备产生的一致性界限最窄(分别为-8.63至4.27和-9.99至6.80),平均偏差分别为每分钟-2.18次和-1.60次呼吸。这些设备在参与者内部和总体标准差方面也最低(加速度计分别为3.23和3.29,胸带分别为4.17和4.28)。

结论

混合效应一致性界限分析使我们能够回答在测量呼吸频率方面哪些设备与金标准设备显示出最强一致性的问题。特别是,从混合效应模型结果中很容易获得的差异的估计参与者内部和总体标准差清楚地表明加速度计和胸带设备表现最佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4405/5156413/f6e78e72087f/pone.0168321.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验