Graduate Program of Biomedical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 10;8(8):e17803. doi: 10.2196/17803.
As the mobile environment has developed recently, there have been studies on continuous respiration monitoring. However, it is not easy for general users to access the sensors typically used to measure respiration. There is also random noise caused by various environmental variables when respiration is measured using noncontact methods in a mobile environment.
In this study, we aimed to estimate the respiration rate using an accelerometer sensor in a smartphone.
First, data were acquired from an accelerometer sensor by a smartphone, which can easily be accessed by the general public. Second, an independent component was extracted to calibrate the three-axis accelerometer. Lastly, the respiration rate was estimated using quefrency selection reflecting the harmonic component because respiration has regular patterns.
From April 2018, we enrolled 30 male participants. When the independent component and quefrency selection were used to estimate the respiration rate, the correlation with respiration acquired from a chest belt was 0.7. The statistical results of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to determine whether the differences in the respiration counts acquired from the chest belt and from the accelerometer sensor were significant. The P value of the difference in the respiration counts acquired from the two sensors was .27, which was not significant. This indicates that the number of respiration counts measured using the accelerometer sensor was not different from that measured using the chest belt. The Bland-Altman results indicated that the mean difference was 0.43, with less than one breath per minute, and that the respiration rate was at the 95% limits of agreement.
There was no relevant difference in the respiration rate measured using a chest belt and that measured using an accelerometer sensor. The accelerometer sensor approach could solve the problems related to the inconvenience of chest belt attachment and the settings. It could be used to detect sleep apnea through constant respiration rate estimation in an internet-of-things environment.
随着移动环境的发展,已经有研究关注连续呼吸监测。然而,一般用户难以访问通常用于测量呼吸的传感器。在移动环境中使用非接触方法测量呼吸时,还会受到各种环境变量的随机噪声的影响。
本研究旨在使用智能手机中的加速度计传感器估计呼吸率。
首先,智能手机从加速度计传感器获取数据,普通大众可以轻松访问这些数据。其次,提取独立分量以校准三轴加速度计。最后,使用反映谐波分量的频率选择估计呼吸率,因为呼吸具有规律的模式。
从 2018 年 4 月开始,我们招募了 30 名男性参与者。当使用独立分量和频率选择来估计呼吸率时,与从胸带获取的呼吸率的相关性为 0.7。Wilcoxon 符号秩检验的统计结果用于确定从胸带和加速度计传感器获取的呼吸计数之间的差异是否显著。两个传感器获取的呼吸计数差异的 P 值为 0.27,不显著。这表明使用加速度计传感器测量的呼吸计数数量与使用胸带测量的呼吸计数数量没有差异。Bland-Altman 结果表明,平均差异为 0.43,每分钟少于一次呼吸,并且呼吸率在 95%的一致性界限内。
使用胸带和加速度计传感器测量的呼吸率没有差异。加速度计传感器方法可以解决胸带佩戴不便和设置相关的问题。它可以通过在物联网环境中不断估计呼吸率来检测睡眠呼吸暂停。