• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肝切除前瞻性登记研究。

Prospective registry for laparoscopic liver resection.

作者信息

Fuji Hiroaki, Hatano Etsuro, Seo Satoru, Arimoto Akira, Okabe Michio, Fujikawa Takahisa, Nishitai Ryuta, Ishii Takamichi, Kaihara Satoshi, Matsushita Takakazu, Oike Fumitaka, Ichimiya Masato, Ohta Shuichi, Yamanaka Kenya, Taura Kojiro, Yasuchika Kentaro, Uemoto Shinji

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.

出版信息

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017 May;10(2):173-178. doi: 10.1111/ases.12351. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1111/ases.12351
PMID:27976516
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been widely performed throughout the world. Although prospective registry studies to clarify the safety of LLR have been feasible, no prior multicenter prospective study has addressed this issue. We have conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study to reveal the current status of LLR in Japan.

METHODS

From April 2015 to March 2016, candidates for LLR were preoperatively enrolled at 12 institutions. The primary end-point was surgical safety, which was evaluated based on surgical factors and on short-term and midterm outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were enrolled. Planned laparoscopic procedures included 96 pure laparoscopies, 1 hand-assisted laparoscopy, and 5 hybrid techniques. Non-anatomical partial resection or left lateral sectionectomy were performed in almost all cases. The median duration of surgery was 221 min. The median blood loss was 80.5 mL. Conversion was required for four patients (3.9%). The 90-day postoperative morbidities with grades more severe than II in the Clavien-Dindo classification were observed in six patients (5.9%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 9.5 days. No cases involved reoperation or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Minor resection of LLR has been performed safely. To ensure the safe dissemination of LLR, including for major resection, a larger multicenter prospective study is required.

摘要

引言

腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)已在全球广泛开展。尽管通过前瞻性注册研究来阐明LLR的安全性是可行的,但此前尚无多中心前瞻性研究探讨过这一问题。我们开展了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究,以揭示LLR在日本的现状。

方法

2015年4月至2016年3月,12家机构对LLR候选患者进行了术前登记。主要终点是手术安全性,根据手术因素以及短期和中期结果进行评估。

结果

共纳入102例患者。计划的腹腔镜手术包括96例单纯腹腔镜手术、1例手辅助腹腔镜手术和5例联合技术手术。几乎所有病例均进行了非解剖性部分切除或左外侧叶切除术。手术中位时长为221分钟。中位失血量为80.5毫升。4例患者(3.9%)需要中转手术。6例患者(5.9%)出现了Clavien-Dindo分类中II级以上的术后90天并发症。术后中位住院时间为9.5天。无再次手术或死亡病例。

结论

LLR的小范围切除已安全实施。为确保包括大范围切除在内的LLR安全推广,需要开展更大规模的多中心前瞻性研究。

相似文献

1
Prospective registry for laparoscopic liver resection.腹腔镜肝切除前瞻性登记研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017 May;10(2):173-178. doi: 10.1111/ases.12351. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
2
Laparoscopic liver resection: initial experience in a North-African single center.腹腔镜肝切除术:北非单中心的初步经验
Tunis Med. 2015 Aug-Sep;93(8-9):523-6.
3
Laparoscopic liver resection using radiofrequency coagulation.使用射频凝固的腹腔镜肝切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Feb;21(2):175-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0846-6. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
4
Comparison of laparoscopic major hepatectomy with propensity score matched open cases from the National Clinical Database in Japan.日本全国临床数据库中腹腔镜大肝切除术与倾向评分匹配的开腹病例的比较。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016 Nov;23(11):721-734. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.405. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
5
Critical appraisal of the impact of individual surgeon experience on the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in the modern era: collective experience of multiple surgeons at a single institution with 324 consecutive cases.在现代时代,评估个体外科医生经验对腹腔镜肝切除术结果的影响:单一机构内多位外科医生的集体经验,共 324 例连续病例。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1802-1811. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5864-7. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
6
Laparoscopic liver resection in elderly patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗老年患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2763-2773. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06840-9. Epub 2019 May 28.
7
International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: a web-based study on the global diffusion of laparoscopic liver surgery prior to the 2nd International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Iwate, Japan.腹腔镜肝切除术技术层面的国际调查:一项基于网络的关于日本岩手县第二届腹腔镜肝切除国际共识会议之前腹腔镜肝手术全球传播情况的研究。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Oct;21(10):737-44. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.141. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
8
Laparoscopic liver resection-understanding its role in current practice: the Henri Mondor Hospital experience.腹腔镜肝切除术——了解其在当前临床实践中的作用:亨利·蒙多医院的经验
Ann Surg. 2009 Jul;250(1):103-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad6660.
9
Long-Term Nononcologic Outcomes for Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Improvement over Open Hepatectomy?腹腔镜肝切除的长期非肿瘤学结局:相较于开腹肝切除术有改善吗?
Am Surg. 2016 Oct;82(10):953-956.
10
Validation of a Difficulty Scoring System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Multicenter Analysis by the Endoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group in Japan.腹腔镜肝切除术难度评分系统的验证:日本内镜肝脏外科学术研究组的多中心分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Aug;225(2):249-258.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic liver resection in cirrhotic patients with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system.肝硬化患者的腹腔镜肝切除术:特别提及难度评分系统
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 May;403(3):371-377. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1671-4. Epub 2018 Apr 4.