Verma Amanda K, Schulte Phillip J, Bittner Vera, Keteyian Steven J, Fleg Jerome L, Piña Ileana L, Swank Ann M, Fitz-Gerald Meredith, Ellis Stephen J, Kraus William E, Whellan David J, O'Connor Christopher M, Mentz Robert J
Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Am Heart J. 2017 Jan;183:54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
Prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) is commonly assessed based on clinical characteristics. The association between partner status and socioeconomic status (SES) and outcomes in chronic HF requires further study.
We performed a post hoc analysis of HF-ACTION, which randomized 2,331 HF patients with ejection fraction ≤35% to usual care ± aerobic exercise training. We examined baseline quality of life and functional capacity and outcomes (all-cause mortality/hospitalization) by partner status and SES using adjusted Cox models and explored an interaction with exercise training. Outcomes were examined based on partner status, education level, annual income, and employment.
Having a partner, education beyond high school, an income >$25,000, and being employed were associated with better baseline functional capacity and quality of life. Over a median follow-up of 2.5 years, higher education, higher income, being employed, and having a partner were associated with lower all-cause mortality/hospitalization. After multivariable adjustment, lower mortality was seen associated with having a partner (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-1.03, P=.15) and more than a high school education (hazard ratio 0.91, CI 0.80-1.02, P=.12), although these associations were not statistically significant. There was no interaction between any of these variables and exercise training on outcomes (all P>.5).
Having a partner and higher SES were associated with greater functional capacity and quality of life at baseline but were not independent predictors of long-term clinical outcomes in patients with chronic HF. These findings provide information that may be considered as potential variables impacting outcomes.
心力衰竭(HF)患者的预后通常基于临床特征进行评估。伴侣状况与社会经济地位(SES)之间的关联以及慢性HF患者的预后需要进一步研究。
我们对HF-ACTION进行了事后分析,该研究将2331例射血分数≤35%的HF患者随机分为常规治疗组和有氧运动训练组。我们使用校正后的Cox模型,根据伴侣状况和SES检查基线生活质量、功能能力和预后(全因死亡率/住院率),并探讨与运动训练的相互作用。根据伴侣状况、教育水平、年收入和就业情况对预后进行检查。
有伴侣、高中以上学历、收入超过25000美元且有工作与更好的基线功能能力和生活质量相关。在中位随访2.5年期间,高等教育、高收入、有工作和有伴侣与较低的全因死亡率/住院率相关。多变量调整后,有伴侣(风险比0.91,95%CI 0.81-1.03,P=0.15)和高中以上学历(风险比0.91,CI 0.80-1.02,P=0.12)与较低的死亡率相关,尽管这些关联无统计学意义。这些变量与运动训练对预后均无相互作用(所有P>0.5)。
有伴侣和较高的SES与基线时更大的功能能力和生活质量相关,但不是慢性HF患者长期临床预后的独立预测因素。这些发现提供了可能被视为影响预后的潜在变量的信息。