Bach Phil Vu, Schlegel Peter N
Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Starr 900, New York, NY 10065 USA.
Basic Clin Androl. 2016 Dec 5;26:15. doi: 10.1186/s12610-016-0043-6. eCollection 2016.
While the semen analysis has traditionally been relied upon to differentiate fertile and infertile men, its utility has been questioned in the current era of assisted reproductive technologies. The desire for more sophisticated diagnostic and predictive tools has led to increased use of sperm DNA damage in the management of male infertility. Despite the availability of numerous assays to measure sperm DNA damage, our understanding of the etiology, measurement, and clinical implications of sperm DNA damage remains incomplete. While the current evidence is fraught with heterogeneity that complicates attempts at comparison and meta-analysis, there does appear to be a role for sperm DNA damage in the development and maintenance of pregnancy in the era of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). However, as noted by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the routine and widespread use of sperm DNA damage testing is not yet supported. Further studies are needed to standardize the measurement of sperm DNA damage and to clarify the exact role of sperm DNA damage within the myriad of other male and female factors contributing to reproductive outcomes in IVF and ICSI.
虽然传统上依靠精液分析来区分有生育能力和无生育能力的男性,但在当前辅助生殖技术时代,其效用受到了质疑。对更精密的诊断和预测工具的需求导致在男性不育管理中更多地使用精子DNA损伤检测。尽管有众多检测精子DNA损伤的方法,但我们对精子DNA损伤的病因、检测方法及临床意义的理解仍不完整。虽然目前的证据充满异质性,使得比较和荟萃分析变得复杂,但在体外受精(IVF)和卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)时代,精子DNA损伤在妊娠的发生和维持中似乎确实起到一定作用。然而,正如美国生殖医学学会所指出的,目前尚不支持常规和广泛地使用精子DNA损伤检测。需要进一步研究来规范精子DNA损伤的检测方法,并阐明在影响IVF和ICSI生殖结局的众多其他男性和女性因素中,精子DNA损伤的确切作用。