Comparison of the simple red blood cell adhesiveness/aggregation test with the laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer: Red blood cell aggregation in patients with coronary artery disease and a healthy control group.

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell (RBC) aggregation influences blood flow properties, impacts blood microcirculation and consequently oxygen delivery. Different methods are established to determine RBC aggregation: under static conditions (i.e. the RBC adhesiveness/aggregation test (EAAT)) or under shear conditions (i.e. the laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer (LORCA)).

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of these two different methods in detecting the RBC aggregation of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and of healthy controls.

METHODS

RBC aggregation was quantified in peripheral venous blood of patients with CAD and healthy controls using EAAT and LORCA.

RESULTS

Both methods detected an increased RBC aggregation in patients with CAD compared to the healthy control group: the ratio of clot-free area to whole area (rCFA) detected with EAAT (15.65 vs. 11.30%), and aggregation index (66.33 vs. 53.90%), shear rate of disaggregation (SDA) (105.59 vs. 69.21 s-1), and upstroke/ttop (0.03 vs. 0.02 au/s) detected with LORCA device were increased, aggregation half time (detected with LORCA) was decreased (2.11 vs. 3.60 s). rCFA (EAAT) correlated with SDA (LORCA).

CONCLUSIONS

Both methods determine an increased RBC aggregation in patients with CAD. However, only one measurement parameter of the LORCA seems to reflect the same RBC aggregation properties as the EAAT.