Hao Ming Zhi, Lin Hai Lan, Chen Qi Zhong, Hu Yu Bin, Chen Jian Bin, Zheng Jian Xiong, Zhou Dong, Zhang Hui
Department of Interventional Radiology, Fujian Health Vocational and Technical College, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
J Dig Dis. 2017 Jan;18(1):31-39. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12435.
To investigate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with embospheres for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Patients with unresectable HCC who were treated with TACE followed by embosphere treatment (Embo-TACE) or conventional TACE (cTACE) between May 2010 and March 2014 were retrospectively included in this study. The Embo-TACE group received lipiodol and chemotherapeutic agent emulsion, followed by embospheres. The cTACE group received lipiodol and chemotherapeutic agent emulsion, followed by gelatin sponge pellets. Time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses of the factors affecting survival were conducted.
The median TTP and OS in the Embo-TACE group were significantly longer than those in the cTACE group (TPP: 7.0 months vs 5.4 months, P = 0.035; OS: 15 months vs 12 months, P = 0.032). Seven days after the first TACE treatment, alanine aminotransferase level was higher in the cTACE group than in the Embo-TACE group (P = 0.015). The ORR did not significantly differ between the two groups (P = 0.827). Additional therapy and local responses one month after the first TACE treatment were associated with OS.
Embo-TACE resulted in a significant improvement in TTP and OS for patients with unresectable HCC, compared with cTACE. Furthermore, Embo-TACE was better tolerated. Additional therapy and local responses one month after the first TACE were independent prognostic factors for OS.
探讨使用栓塞微球经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)的安全性和疗效。
回顾性纳入2010年5月至2014年3月期间接受TACE治疗后再行栓塞微球治疗(Embo-TACE)或传统TACE(cTACE)的不可切除HCC患者。Embo-TACE组先接受碘油与化疗药物乳剂,随后注入栓塞微球。cTACE组先接受碘油与化疗药物乳剂,随后注入明胶海绵颗粒。比较两组的疾病进展时间(TTP)、总生存期(OS)、总缓解率(ORR)及安全性。对影响生存的因素进行单因素和多因素回归分析。
Embo-TACE组的中位TTP和OS显著长于cTACE组(TPP:7.0个月对5.4个月,P = 0.035;OS:15个月对12个月,P = 0.032)。首次TACE治疗7天后,cTACE组的丙氨酸转氨酶水平高于Embo-TACE组(P = 0.015)。两组的ORR无显著差异(P = 0.827)。首次TACE治疗1个月后的额外治疗和局部反应与OS相关。
与cTACE相比,Embo-TACE使不可切除HCC患者的TTP和OS有显著改善。此外,Embo-TACE耐受性更好。首次TACE治疗1个月后的额外治疗和局部反应是OS的独立预后因素。