• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

习得复杂焦点标记:芬兰4至5岁儿童在互动中使用韵律和词序

Acquiring Complex Focus-Marking: Finnish 4- to 5-Year-Olds Use Prosody and Word Order in Interaction.

作者信息

Arnhold Anja, Chen Aoju, Järvikivi Juhani

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, University of KonstanzKonstanz, Germany; Department of Linguistics, University of AlbertaEdmonton, AB, Canada.

Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 1;7:1886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01886. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01886
PMID:27990130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5131328/
Abstract

Using a language game to elicit short sentences in various information structural conditions, we found that Finnish 4- to 5-year-olds already exhibit a characteristic interaction between prosody and word order in marking information structure. Providing insights into the acquisition of this complex system of interactions, the production data showed interesting parallels to adult speakers of Finnish on the one hand and to children acquiring other languages on the other hand. Analyzing a total of 571 sentences produced by 16 children, we found that children rarely adjusted input word order, but did systematically avoid marked OVS order in contrastive object focus condition. Focus condition also significantly affected four prosodic parameters, , duration, pauses and voice quality. Differing slightly from effects displayed in adult Finnish speech, the children produced larger ranges for words in contrastive focus and smaller ones for unfocused words, varied only the duration of object constituents to be longer in focus and shorter in unfocused condition, inserted more pauses before and after focused constituents and systematically modified their use of non-modal voice quality only in utterances with narrow focus. Crucially, these effects were modulated by word order. In contrast to comparable data from children acquiring Germanic languages, the present findings reflect the more central role of word order and of interactions between word order and prosody in marking information structure in Finnish. Thus, the study highlights the role of the target language in determining linguistic development.

摘要

通过语言游戏在各种信息结构条件下引出短句,我们发现芬兰4到5岁的儿童在标记信息结构时已经表现出韵律和词序之间的一种特征性互动。生产数据一方面为这一复杂互动系统的习得提供了见解,显示出与芬兰成年说话者有趣的相似之处,另一方面也与习得其他语言的儿童相似。分析16名儿童总共生成的571个句子,我们发现儿童很少调整输入的词序,但在对比性宾语焦点条件下确实会系统性地避免有标记的OVS(宾语-动词-主语)语序。焦点条件也显著影响了四个韵律参数,即时长、停顿和嗓音质量。与芬兰成年语音中显示的效果略有不同,儿童在对比性焦点中生成的单词范围更大,在非焦点单词中生成的范围更小,仅改变宾语成分的时长,使其在焦点中更长,在非焦点条件下更短,在焦点成分之前和之后插入更多停顿,并且仅在窄焦点话语中系统性地改变他们对非模态嗓音质量的使用。至关重要的是,这些效果受到词序的调节。与习得日耳曼语族语言的儿童的可比数据相比,目前的研究结果反映了词序以及词序和韵律之间的互动在芬兰语信息结构标记中发挥的更核心作用。因此,这项研究突出了目标语言在决定语言发展方面的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/c0abaa64b41a/fpsyg-07-01886-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/beece2e9433c/fpsyg-07-01886-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/6a0b552d7916/fpsyg-07-01886-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/833ef7cca1c3/fpsyg-07-01886-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/7474295b7681/fpsyg-07-01886-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/637d5d9cd1d3/fpsyg-07-01886-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/4a0e3900bab4/fpsyg-07-01886-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/7a6ef88d81d6/fpsyg-07-01886-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/c0abaa64b41a/fpsyg-07-01886-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/beece2e9433c/fpsyg-07-01886-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/6a0b552d7916/fpsyg-07-01886-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/833ef7cca1c3/fpsyg-07-01886-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/7474295b7681/fpsyg-07-01886-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/637d5d9cd1d3/fpsyg-07-01886-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/4a0e3900bab4/fpsyg-07-01886-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/7a6ef88d81d6/fpsyg-07-01886-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b6/5131328/c0abaa64b41a/fpsyg-07-01886-g0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Acquiring Complex Focus-Marking: Finnish 4- to 5-Year-Olds Use Prosody and Word Order in Interaction.习得复杂焦点标记:芬兰4至5岁儿童在互动中使用韵律和词序
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 1;7:1886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01886. eCollection 2016.
2
The acquisition of prosodic marking of narrow focus in Central Swedish.中央瑞典语中狭窄焦点韵律标记的习得。
J Child Lang. 2022 Mar;49(2):213-238. doi: 10.1017/S0305000920000847. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
Acoustic Correlates of Focus Marking in Czech and Polish.捷克语和波兰语中焦点标记的声学关联
Lang Speech. 2019 Jun;62(2):358-377. doi: 10.1177/0023830918773536. Epub 2018 May 20.
4
Prosody facilitates learning the word order in a new language.韵律有助于学习新语言的语序。
Cognition. 2021 Aug;213:104686. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104686. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
5
Priming Effects of Focus in Mandarin Chinese.汉语中焦点的启动效应。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 30;10:1985. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01985. eCollection 2019.
6
The development of prosodic focus marking in French.法语中韵律焦点标记的发展。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 25;15:1360308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360308. eCollection 2024.
7
Prosodic focus marking in Seoul Korean-speaking children: the use of prosodic phrasing.首尔说韩语儿童的韵律焦点标记:韵律短语的使用
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 31;15:1352280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1352280. eCollection 2024.
8
Prosodic focus marking in clefts and syntactically unmarked equivalents: Prosody-syntax trade-off or additive effects?复句和非标记句法等同语中的韵律焦点标记:韵律-句法的权衡还是附加效应?
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Mar;149(3):1390. doi: 10.1121/10.0003594.
9
Understanding Prosodic Focus Marking in Mandarin Chinese: Data from Children and Adults.理解汉语普通话中的韵律焦点标记:来自儿童和成人的数据。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Feb;48(1):19-32. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9580-9.
10
Context- and prosody-driven ERP markers for dialog focus perception in children.语境和韵律驱动的 ERP 标记用于儿童对话焦点感知
Brain Topogr. 2011 Oct;24(3-4):229-42. doi: 10.1007/s10548-011-0194-x. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The development of prosodic focus marking in French.法语中韵律焦点标记的发展。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 25;15:1360308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360308. eCollection 2024.
2
The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context.对话语境中焦点标记对代词指代消解的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 26;12:684639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684639. eCollection 2021.
3
Bridging the Gap Between Prosody and Pragmatics: The Acquisition of Pragmatic Prosody in the Preschool Years and Its Relation With Theory of Mind.

本文引用的文献

1
Quiet is the new loud: pausing and focus in child and adult Dutch.安静才是新的喧嚣:荷兰儿童与成人的停顿与专注。
Lang Speech. 2015 Mar;58(Pt 1):8-23. doi: 10.1177/0023830914563589.
2
How German children use intonation to signal information status in narrative discourse.德国儿童如何在叙事话语中运用语调来表明信息状态。
J Child Lang. 2014 Sep;41(5):1015-61. doi: 10.1017/S0305000913000251. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
3
A Comparative Analysis of Pausing in Child and Adult Storytelling.儿童与成人讲故事时停顿的比较分析
弥合韵律与语用学之间的差距:学前阶段语用韵律的习得及其与心理理论的关系
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 16;12:662124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662124. eCollection 2021.
Appl Psycholinguist. 2013 Jul;34(3):569-589. doi: 10.1017/S0142716411000877.
4
Interpretation of contrastive pitch accent in six- to eleven-year-old English-speaking children (and adults).6至11岁英语儿童(及成人)中对比性音高重音的解读
J Child Lang. 2014 Jan;41(1):84-110. doi: 10.1017/S0305000912000554. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
5
Tuning information packaging: intonational realization of topic and focus in child Dutch.调整信息包装:儿童荷兰语中主题和焦点的语调实现。
J Child Lang. 2011 Nov;38(5):1055-83. doi: 10.1017/S0305000910000541. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
6
Blue car, red car: Developing efficiency in online interpretation of adjective-noun phrases.蓝车,红车:形容词-名词短语在线口译效率的发展。
Cogn Psychol. 2010 May;60(3):190-217. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
7
Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.分类数据分析:远离方差分析(无论是否进行变换),转向逻辑混合模型。
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
8
Anticipatory effects of intonation: Eye movements during instructed visual search.语调的预期效应:指令性视觉搜索过程中的眼动
J Mem Lang. 2008 Feb;58(2):541-573. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.013.
9
Word order and information status in child language.儿童语言中的词序与信息状态
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):317-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.010. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
10
Focus in production: tonal shape, intensity and word order.生产重点:音调形状、强度和词序。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Feb;121(2):EL55-61. doi: 10.1121/1.2424264.