• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法语中韵律焦点标记的发展。

The development of prosodic focus marking in French.

作者信息

Destruel Emilie, Lalande Louise, Chen Aoju

机构信息

Department of French & Italian, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, United States.

Institute for Language Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 25;15:1360308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360308. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360308
PMID:39188863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11345614/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

French is traditionally described as a language favoring syntactic means to mark focus, yet recent research shows that prosody is also used. We examine how French-speaking children use prosody to realize narrow focus and contrastive focus in the absence of syntactic means, compared to adults.

METHOD

We elicited SVO sentences using a virtual robot-mediated picture-matching task from monolingual French-speaking adults ( = 11), 4- to 5-year-olds ( = 12), and 7- to 8-year-olds ( = 15). These sentences were produced with narrow focus on either the subject or the object and contrastive focus on the object.

RESULTS

Linear mixed-effects logistic regression modeling on duration, mean intensity, mean pitch, and pitch range of the subject and object nouns showed that the 4- to 5-year-olds did not use any of these prosodic cues for focus marking but the 7- to 8-year-olds distinguished narrow focus from non-focus through an increase in duration, mean intensity and to a lesser degree, mean pitch in the object nouns, largely similar to the adults, and tended to use mean pitch for this purpose in the subject nouns, different from the adults, who used duration.

DISCUSSION

Our study corroborates previous findings that French-speaking 4- to 5-year-olds do not use prosody for focus. Further, it provides new evidence that 7- to 8-year-olds use prosody to mark narrow focus on the object in a more adult-like manner than narrow focus on the subject, arguably caused by a more dominant role of syntactic means in the subject position in French. Together, these findings show that syntax-dominance can influence both the route and the rate of acquisition of prosodic focus marking.

摘要

引言

传统观点认为,法语是一种倾向于使用句法手段来标记焦点的语言,但最近的研究表明,韵律也被用于此。我们研究了与成年人相比,说法语的儿童在没有句法手段的情况下如何使用韵律来实现窄焦点和对比焦点。

方法

我们通过一个虚拟机器人介导的图片匹配任务,从单语说法语的成年人(n = 11)、4至5岁儿童(n = 12)和7至8岁儿童(n = 15)中引出主谓宾(SVO)句子。这些句子在主语或宾语上带有窄焦点,在宾语上带有对比焦点。

结果

对主语和宾语名词的时长、平均强度、平均音高和音高范围进行线性混合效应逻辑回归建模显示,4至5岁的儿童没有使用这些韵律线索中的任何一种来标记焦点,但7至8岁的儿童通过增加宾语名词的时长、平均强度以及在较小程度上增加平均音高,将窄焦点与非焦点区分开来,这在很大程度上与成年人相似,并且倾向于在主语名词中使用平均音高来实现这一目的,这与使用时长的成年人不同。

讨论

我们的研究证实了之前的发现,即说法语的4至5岁儿童不使用韵律来标记焦点。此外,它提供了新的证据,表明7至8岁的儿童使用韵律以比在主语上更像成年人的方式标记宾语上的窄焦点,这可以说是由于句法手段在法语主语位置上发挥了更主导的作用。总之,这些发现表明句法主导性可以影响韵律焦点标记的习得途径和速度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337b/11345614/2fb2b574ca27/fpsyg-15-1360308-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337b/11345614/252a5d8c470d/fpsyg-15-1360308-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337b/11345614/52573836a0c2/fpsyg-15-1360308-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337b/11345614/56073e8d90c8/fpsyg-15-1360308-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337b/11345614/2fb2b574ca27/fpsyg-15-1360308-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337b/11345614/252a5d8c470d/fpsyg-15-1360308-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337b/11345614/52573836a0c2/fpsyg-15-1360308-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337b/11345614/56073e8d90c8/fpsyg-15-1360308-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337b/11345614/2fb2b574ca27/fpsyg-15-1360308-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The development of prosodic focus marking in French.法语中韵律焦点标记的发展。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 25;15:1360308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360308. eCollection 2024.
2
Prosodic focus marking in Seoul Korean-speaking children: the use of prosodic phrasing.首尔说韩语儿童的韵律焦点标记:韵律短语的使用
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 31;15:1352280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1352280. eCollection 2024.
3
The acquisition of prosodic marking of narrow focus in Central Swedish.中央瑞典语中狭窄焦点韵律标记的习得。
J Child Lang. 2022 Mar;49(2):213-238. doi: 10.1017/S0305000920000847. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
4
Acquisition of prosodic focus marking by English, French, and German three-, four-, five- and six-year-olds.英国、法国和德国3岁、4岁、5岁及6岁儿童对韵律焦点标记的习得情况。
J Child Lang. 2018 Jan;45(1):219-241. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000071. Epub 2017 May 2.
5
The developmental path to adult-like prosodic focus-marking in Mandarin Chinese-speaking children.说普通话的儿童向类似成人的韵律焦点标记发展的路径。
First Lang. 2018 Feb;38(1):26-46. doi: 10.1177/0142723717733920. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
6
Prosodic focus marking in clefts and syntactically unmarked equivalents: Prosody-syntax trade-off or additive effects?复句和非标记句法等同语中的韵律焦点标记:韵律-句法的权衡还是附加效应?
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Mar;149(3):1390. doi: 10.1121/10.0003594.
7
Focus-marking in a tonal language: Prosodic differences between Cantonese-speaking children with and without autism spectrum disorder.重音标记在声调语言中:有和没有自闭症谱系障碍的粤语儿童之间的韵律差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 19;19(7):e0306272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306272. eCollection 2024.
8
Understanding Prosodic Focus Marking in Mandarin Chinese: Data from Children and Adults.理解汉语普通话中的韵律焦点标记:来自儿童和成人的数据。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Feb;48(1):19-32. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9580-9.
9
Acquiring Complex Focus-Marking: Finnish 4- to 5-Year-Olds Use Prosody and Word Order in Interaction.习得复杂焦点标记:芬兰4至5岁儿童在互动中使用韵律和词序
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 1;7:1886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01886. eCollection 2016.
10
Neural correlates of the perception of contrastive prosodic focus in French: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.神经关联的感知对比韵律焦点的法语:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Oct;34(10):2574-91. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22090. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Pre-schoolers use head gestures rather than prosodic cues to highlight important information in speech.学前期儿童使用头部动作而不是韵律线索来突出言语中的重要信息。
Dev Sci. 2022 Jan;25(1):e13154. doi: 10.1111/desc.13154. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
2
The acquisition of prosodic marking of narrow focus in Central Swedish.中央瑞典语中狭窄焦点韵律标记的习得。
J Child Lang. 2022 Mar;49(2):213-238. doi: 10.1017/S0305000920000847. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
The developmental path to adult-like prosodic focus-marking in Mandarin Chinese-speaking children.
说普通话的儿童向类似成人的韵律焦点标记发展的路径。
First Lang. 2018 Feb;38(1):26-46. doi: 10.1177/0142723717733920. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
4
Acquisition of prosodic focus marking by English, French, and German three-, four-, five- and six-year-olds.英国、法国和德国3岁、4岁、5岁及6岁儿童对韵律焦点标记的习得情况。
J Child Lang. 2018 Jan;45(1):219-241. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000071. Epub 2017 May 2.
5
Acquiring Complex Focus-Marking: Finnish 4- to 5-Year-Olds Use Prosody and Word Order in Interaction.习得复杂焦点标记:芬兰4至5岁儿童在互动中使用韵律和词序
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 1;7:1886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01886. eCollection 2016.
6
The Status of the Initial Rise as a Marker of Focus in French.
Lang Speech. 2016 Jun;59(Pt 2):165-95. doi: 10.1177/0023830915583082.
7
Do patients with schizophrenia use prosody to encode contrastive discourse status?精神分裂症患者是否使用韵律来编码对比话语地位?
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 18;5:755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00755. eCollection 2014.
8
Tuning information packaging: intonational realization of topic and focus in child Dutch.调整信息包装:儿童荷兰语中主题和焦点的语调实现。
J Child Lang. 2011 Nov;38(5):1055-83. doi: 10.1017/S0305000910000541. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
9
Acoustic emphasis in four year olds.四岁儿童的声学重音
Cognition. 2008 Jun;107(3):1093-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.10.005. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
10
Use of contrastive stress by preschool children.学龄前儿童对对比重音的运用。
J Speech Hear Res. 1970 Jun;13(2):395-9. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1302.395.