• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首尔说韩语儿童的韵律焦点标记:韵律短语的使用

Prosodic focus marking in Seoul Korean-speaking children: the use of prosodic phrasing.

作者信息

Yang Anqi, Cho Taehong, Kim Sahyang, Chen Aoju

机构信息

School of Foreign Languages, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Hanyang Institute for Phonetics and Cognitive Sciences of Language, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 31;15:1352280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1352280. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1352280
PMID:39161687
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11331792/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Prosodic focus marking in Seoul Korean is known to be achieved primarily through prosodic phrasing, different from the use of prosody for this purpose in many other languages. This study investigates how children use prosodic phrasing for focus-marking purposes in Seoul Korean, compared to adults.

METHODS

Using a picture-matching game, we elicited semi-spontaneous production of SOV sentences in various focus conditions from monolingual Seoul Korean-speaking children aged 4 to 11 years.

RESULTS

We found that the children varied prosodic boundaries to distinguish narrow focus from pre-focus and broad focus in a largely adult-like manner at the age of 4 to 5; at this age, they did not distinguish narrow focus from post-focus or contrastive focus using prosodic boundaries, similar to the adults. Their use of the prosodic boundaries in distinguishing the focus conditions was not fully adult-like in terms of frequency until the age of 10 to 11.

DISCUSSION

In conjunction with the findings of previous studies on the acquisition of focus marking in Germanic languages, performed using a similar experimental method, our findings suggest that Seoul Korean-speaking children acquire the use of prosodic phrasing earlier than Dutch-speaking children acquiring the use of pitch accent but slightly later than Stockholm Swedish-speaking children acquiring the use of a prominence-marking high tone. These findings imply that the rate of focus-marking acquisition depends on the transparency of the form-meaning mapping between the phonological cue and focus.

摘要

引言

众所周知,首尔韩语中的韵律焦点标记主要通过韵律短语来实现,这与许多其他语言在这方面对韵律的使用不同。本研究调查了与成年人相比,首尔韩语儿童如何将韵律短语用于焦点标记目的。

方法

我们通过一个图片匹配游戏,从4至11岁的首尔韩语单语儿童中引出了在各种焦点条件下的SOV句子的半自发产出。

结果

我们发现,4至5岁的儿童以大致类似成人的方式改变韵律边界,以区分窄焦点与焦点前和宽焦点;在这个年龄,他们没有像成年人那样使用韵律边界来区分窄焦点与焦点后或对比焦点。直到10至11岁,他们在使用韵律边界区分焦点条件方面的频率才完全类似成人。

讨论

结合之前使用类似实验方法对日耳曼语系语言焦点标记习得的研究结果,我们的研究结果表明,说首尔韩语的儿童比说荷兰语的儿童更早习得韵律短语的使用,但比说斯德哥尔摩瑞典语的儿童习得使用突出标记高音稍晚。这些发现意味着焦点标记习得的速度取决于语音线索和焦点之间形式-意义映射的透明度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3f8/11331792/a2a704dbbb1b/fpsyg-15-1352280-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3f8/11331792/093fd43733b4/fpsyg-15-1352280-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3f8/11331792/1568cec5607a/fpsyg-15-1352280-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3f8/11331792/a2a704dbbb1b/fpsyg-15-1352280-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3f8/11331792/093fd43733b4/fpsyg-15-1352280-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3f8/11331792/1568cec5607a/fpsyg-15-1352280-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3f8/11331792/a2a704dbbb1b/fpsyg-15-1352280-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Prosodic focus marking in Seoul Korean-speaking children: the use of prosodic phrasing.首尔说韩语儿童的韵律焦点标记:韵律短语的使用
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 31;15:1352280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1352280. eCollection 2024.
2
The acquisition of prosodic marking of narrow focus in Central Swedish.中央瑞典语中狭窄焦点韵律标记的习得。
J Child Lang. 2022 Mar;49(2):213-238. doi: 10.1017/S0305000920000847. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
The developmental path to adult-like prosodic focus-marking in Mandarin Chinese-speaking children.说普通话的儿童向类似成人的韵律焦点标记发展的路径。
First Lang. 2018 Feb;38(1):26-46. doi: 10.1177/0142723717733920. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
4
The development of prosodic focus marking in French.法语中韵律焦点标记的发展。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 25;15:1360308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360308. eCollection 2024.
5
Focus-marking in a tonal language: Prosodic differences between Cantonese-speaking children with and without autism spectrum disorder.重音标记在声调语言中:有和没有自闭症谱系障碍的粤语儿童之间的韵律差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 19;19(7):e0306272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306272. eCollection 2024.
6
Understanding Prosodic Focus Marking in Mandarin Chinese: Data from Children and Adults.理解汉语普通话中的韵律焦点标记:来自儿童和成人的数据。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Feb;48(1):19-32. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9580-9.
7
Children's comprehension of prosodically marked focus in Hungarian: How mandatory syntactic focus-marking affects the trajectory of acquisition.儿童对匈牙利语韵律重音焦点的理解:强制性句法重音标记如何影响习得轨迹。
J Child Lang. 2022 Jul;49(4):824-838. doi: 10.1017/S0305000921000313. Epub 2021 May 19.
8
The f0 perturbation effects in focus marking: Evidence from Korean and Japanese.焦点标记中的 f0 干扰效应:来自韩语和日语的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0283139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283139. eCollection 2023.
9
Priming Effects of Focus in Mandarin Chinese.汉语中焦点的启动效应。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 30;10:1985. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01985. eCollection 2019.
10
Focus Marking and Prosodic Boundary Strength in French.法语中的焦点标记与韵律边界强度
Phonetica. 2020;77(4):244-267. doi: 10.1159/000499071. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Prosodic realizations of new, given, and corrective referents in the spontaneous speech of toddlers.幼儿自然语言中,新信息、已知信息和纠正性指代的韵律实现。
J Child Lang. 2021 May;48(3):541-568. doi: 10.1017/S0305000920000434. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
2
The acquisition of prosodic marking of narrow focus in Central Swedish.中央瑞典语中狭窄焦点韵律标记的习得。
J Child Lang. 2022 Mar;49(2):213-238. doi: 10.1017/S0305000920000847. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
Perception of Prosodic Boundary Correlates by Newborn Infants.新生儿对韵律边界关联的感知。
Infancy. 2001 Jul;2(3):385-394. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0203_6. Epub 2001 Jul 1.
4
The developmental path to adult-like prosodic focus-marking in Mandarin Chinese-speaking children.说普通话的儿童向类似成人的韵律焦点标记发展的路径。
First Lang. 2018 Feb;38(1):26-46. doi: 10.1177/0142723717733920. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
Infants' Processing of Prosodic Cues: Electrophysiological Evidence for Boundary Perception beyond Pause Detection.婴儿对韵律线索的加工:超越停顿检测的边界感知的电生理证据
Lang Speech. 2018 Mar;61(1):153-169. doi: 10.1177/0023830917730590. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
Tuning information packaging: intonational realization of topic and focus in child Dutch.调整信息包装:儿童荷兰语中主题和焦点的语调实现。
J Child Lang. 2011 Nov;38(5):1055-83. doi: 10.1017/S0305000910000541. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
7
Developmental changes in the weighting of prosodic cues.韵律线索权重的发育变化。
Dev Sci. 2008 Jul;11(4):596-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00704.x.
8
Intonation development from five to thirteen.语调从五岁到十三岁的发展。
J Child Lang. 2004 Nov;31(4):749-78. doi: 10.1017/s030500090400652x.
9
Do infants perceive word boundaries? An empirical study of the bootstrapping of lexical acquisition.婴儿能感知单词边界吗?一项关于词汇习得引导的实证研究。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Mar;95(3):1570-80. doi: 10.1121/1.408544.
10
Use of contrastive stress by preschool children.学龄前儿童对对比重音的运用。
J Speech Hear Res. 1970 Jun;13(2):395-9. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1302.395.