Woermann Ulrich, Weltsch Lena, Kunz Alexandra, Stricker Daniel, Guttormsen Sissel
University of Bern, Institute for Medical Education IML, Education and Media Unit AUM, Bern, Switzerland.
Bern, Switzerland.
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Nov 15;33(5):Doc73. doi: 10.3205/zma001072. eCollection 2016.
Interprofessional collaboration is becoming increasingly important in health care for various reasons. Interprofessional Education (IPE) can provide a basis for this. The aim of our study was to find out how medical (MS) and nursing students (NS) think about their own and other professions, what they know about each other, how strong their willingness to embrace IPE is, and what forms of IPE they deem useful. Seven IPE experts rated the two measuring instruments, Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale RIPLS, and Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale IEPS in terms of relevance of the items, and the quality of translation into German. Nine RIPLS items and 13 IEPS items were considered content-valid. All MS of the University of Bern and NS of the two Bernese educational institutions for nursing were invited to the online survey in the fall of 2014 by email. 498 (254 MS, 244 NS) of the 2374 invited students completely filled in the questionnaire (21%). The results of the reduced RIPLS allowed no conclusive statements. When assessing their own occupational group in the IEPS, the MS attributed "competence and autonomy" to themselves significantly more frequently, while to the NS, the same was true for the item, "actual cooperation". MS know significantly less about the training of other health professionals. NS show a significantly higher willingness to embrace IPE. Teaching ethics, communication, team training, and clinical skills are deemed suitable for IPE by both groups. From the comments it appears that in both groups a majority welcomes IPE; however, the various arguments had different prevalence in both groups. Both groups fear that IPE leads to heightened stress during the study. A subgroup of MS fears a lowering of academic level. The results of this survey of Bernese MS and NS concerning IPE provide important information for the planning and implementation of IPE. Important steps in the introduction of IPE will be a clear justification and the definition of its objectives. These must be explicitly communicated to all students.
由于各种原因,跨专业协作在医疗保健领域正变得越来越重要。跨专业教育(IPE)可为其提供基础。我们研究的目的是了解医学专业学生(MS)和护理专业学生(NS)如何看待自己及其他专业,他们对彼此的了解程度如何,他们接受IPE的意愿有多强烈,以及他们认为哪些IPE形式是有用的。七位IPE专家对两种测量工具——跨专业学习准备量表(RIPLS)和跨学科教育认知量表(IEPS)的项目相关性及德语翻译质量进行了评估。九个RIPLS项目和十三个IEPS项目被认为具有内容效度。2014年秋季,通过电子邮件邀请了伯尔尼大学的所有医学专业学生以及伯尔尼两所护理教育机构的护理专业学生参加在线调查。在受邀的2374名学生中,有498名(254名医学专业学生,244名护理专业学生)完整填写了问卷(21%)。简化后的RIPLS结果无法得出结论性陈述。在IEPS中评估自己的职业群体时,医学专业学生将“能力和自主性”更多地归因于自己,而护理专业学生则在“实际合作”这一项目上有同样的情况。医学专业学生对其他卫生专业人员的培训了解明显较少。护理专业学生表现出明显更高的接受IPE的意愿。两组都认为教学伦理、沟通、团队培训和临床技能适合进行IPE。从评论中可以看出,两组中的大多数人都欢迎IPE;然而,不同的论点在两组中的普遍程度不同。两组都担心IPE会导致学习期间压力增大。一部分医学专业学生担心学术水平会降低。这项针对伯尔尼医学专业学生和护理专业学生关于IPE的调查结果为IPE的规划和实施提供了重要信息。引入IPE的重要步骤将是明确的理由阐述及其目标的定义。这些必须明确传达给所有学生。