Hägg-Martinell Ann, Hult Håkan, Henriksson Peter, Kiessling Anna
Department of Health Scinces, Roda Korsets Hogskola, Huddinge, Sweden
Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 29;9(7):e027590. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027590.
Almost all healthcare today is team-based in collaboration over professional borders, and numerous students have work-based learning in such contexts. However, interprofessional learning (IPL) in clinical settings has mostly been systematically explored in specially designed contexts dedicated to interprofessional education (IPE). This study aimed to explore the possibilities for IPL activities, and if or how they occur, in an acute ward context not dedicated to IPE.
Between 2011 and 2013 ethnographic observations were performed of medical and nursing students' interactions and IPL during early clerkship at an acute internal medicine ward in Sweden. Field notes were taken and analysed based on the framework of IPE: .
21 medical, 4 nursing students and 30 supervisors participated.
there were no organised IPE activities. Instead, medical and nursing students learnt in parallel. However, students interacted with staff members from other professions. -interprofessional supervision was frequent. Interprofessional supervision of nursing students by doctors focused on theoretical questions and answers, while interprofessional supervision of medical students by nurses focused on the performance of technical skills. -students were observed to actively observe interactions between staff and learnt how staff conducted different tasks.
This study shows that there were plenty of possibilities for IPL activities, but the potential was not fully utilised or facilitated. Serendipitous IPL activities differed between observed medical and nursing students. Although interprofessional supervision was fairly frequent, students were not learning with, from or about each other over professional borders.
如今,几乎所有医疗保健工作都是跨专业协作的团队工作,众多学生在这样的环境中进行基于工作的学习。然而,临床环境中的跨专业学习(IPL)大多是在专门为跨专业教育(IPE)设计的特定环境中进行系统探索的。本研究旨在探讨在非专门用于IPE的急性病房环境中开展IPL活动的可能性,以及这些活动是否发生及如何发生。
2011年至2013年期间,对瑞典一家急性内科病房的医学和护理专业学生在早期实习期间的互动及IPL情况进行了人种志观察。根据IPE框架记录并分析了实地笔记。
21名医学专业学生、4名护理专业学生和30名带教老师参与了研究。
没有组织化的IPE活动。相反,医学和护理专业学生并行学习。然而,学生与其他专业的工作人员进行了互动。跨专业监督很频繁。医生对护理专业学生的跨专业监督侧重于理论问答,而护士对医学专业学生的跨专业监督则侧重于技术技能的操作。观察到学生积极观察工作人员之间的互动,并了解工作人员如何执行不同的任务。
本研究表明,IPL活动有很多可能性,但潜力未得到充分利用或促进。医学和护理专业学生之间偶然发生的IPL活动存在差异。尽管跨专业监督相当频繁,但学生并没有跨越专业界限相互学习、相互借鉴或了解彼此。