• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喜欢还是厌恶:啮齿动物对植物次生代谢产物气味的反应

Like or dislike: Response of rodents to the odor of plant secondary metabolites.

作者信息

Hansen Sabine C, Stolter Caroline, Imholt Christian, Jacob Jens

机构信息

Julius-Kühn Institute for Plant Protection in Horticulture and Forests, Vertebrate Research, Münster, Germany.

University Hamburg, Biocenter Grindel and Zoological Museum, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Integr Zool. 2017 Sep;12(5):428-436. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12245.

DOI:10.1111/1749-4877.12245
PMID:27992117
Abstract

Rodents, including common voles (Microtus arvalis) and house mice (Mus musculus) cause immense pre-harvest and post-harvest losses. Therefore, developing methods that mitigate these losses while maintaining their role in ecosystems is a priority. Several plant secondary metabolites (PSM) which significantly reduce food intake of both species under laboratory conditions have been identified. However, before these can be used in rodent pest management, they must be tested under more natural conditions where other food sources are available. In this study, the odors of 4 PSMs were evaluated for their repellent effects in experiments conducted in semi-natural enclosures. Soil treated with PSMs or untreated soil (experimental control) was placed in an underground box containing food (rolled oats). We quantified the number of visits to each box and could demonstrate that all 4 PSMs reduced the number of visits to treatment boxes in both rodent species. For common voles the combination of methyl nonyl ketone + black pepper oil was the most repellent PSM. House mice made fewer visits to all PSM boxes; boxes with the anthraquinone were visited least. Furthermore, house mice consumed less food from boxes containing soil treated with all 4 PSMs. Our results suggest that PSMs are repellent in murid and microtine rodents under semi-field conditions. In addition, the future use of PSM odors for repelling both pest species, especially house mice, seems promising. Further investigations with other PSMs, different concentrations as well as alternative application methods are needed to repel common voles from attractive crops.

摘要

啮齿动物,包括普通田鼠(草原田鼠)和家鼠,会造成巨大的收获前和收获后损失。因此,开发既能减轻这些损失又能维持其在生态系统中作用的方法是当务之急。已经鉴定出几种植物次生代谢产物(PSM),在实验室条件下它们能显著减少这两种物种的食物摄入量。然而,在将这些物质用于啮齿动物害虫管理之前,必须在有其他食物来源的更自然条件下进行测试。在本研究中,在半自然围栏中进行的实验中评估了4种PSM的气味的驱避效果。将用PSM处理过的土壤或未处理的土壤(实验对照)放置在一个装有食物(燕麦片)的地下盒子中。我们对每个盒子的访问次数进行了量化,结果表明所有4种PSM都减少了两种啮齿动物对处理过的盒子的访问次数。对于普通田鼠来说,甲基壬基酮+黑胡椒油的组合是最具驱避性的PSM。家鼠对所有PSM盒子的访问次数较少;含有蒽醌的盒子访问次数最少。此外,家鼠从装有所有4种PSM处理过的土壤的盒子中消耗的食物较少。我们的结果表明,在半田间条件下,PSM对鼠科和田鼠科啮齿动物具有驱避作用。此外,未来使用PSM气味来驱避这两种害虫,尤其是家鼠,似乎很有前景。需要对其他PSM、不同浓度以及替代施用方法进行进一步研究,以驱赶普通田鼠远离有吸引力的作物。

相似文献

1
Like or dislike: Response of rodents to the odor of plant secondary metabolites.喜欢还是厌恶:啮齿动物对植物次生代谢产物气味的反应
Integr Zool. 2017 Sep;12(5):428-436. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12245.
2
Efficacy of methyl nonyl ketone as an in-soil repellent for common voles (Microtus arvalis).甲基壬基酮作为土壤内驱避剂对常见田鼠(黑线姬鼠)的效果。
Pest Manag Sci. 2013 Mar;69(3):431-6. doi: 10.1002/ps.3426. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
3
The repelling effect of plant secondary metabolites on water voles, Arvicola amphibius.植物次生代谢产物对水鼠(Arvicola amphibius)的驱避作用。
Pest Manag Sci. 2013 Mar;69(3):437-43. doi: 10.1002/ps.3438. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
4
Fear effects on bank voles (Rodentia: Arvicolinae): testing for repellent candidates from predator volatiles.恐惧对田鼠(啮齿目:仓鼠科)的影响:从捕食者挥发物中测试驱避候选物。
Pest Manag Sci. 2022 Apr;78(4):1677-1685. doi: 10.1002/ps.6787. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
5
Review of anthraquinone applications for pest management and agricultural crop protection.蒽醌在害虫管理和农作物保护中的应用综述。
Pest Manag Sci. 2016 Oct;72(10):1813-25. doi: 10.1002/ps.4330. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
6
Self-service traps inspected by avian and terrestrial predators as a management option for rodents.作为啮齿动物管理的一种选择,鸟类和陆地捕食者检查自助陷阱。
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Jan;76(1):103-110. doi: 10.1002/ps.5550. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
7
Plant Secondary Metabolites as Rodent Repellents: a Systematic Review.作为啮齿动物驱避剂的植物次生代谢产物:一项系统综述。
J Chem Ecol. 2016 Sep;42(9):970-983. doi: 10.1007/s10886-016-0760-5. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
8
Influence of Cat Odor on Reproductive Behavior and Physiology in the House Mouse: (Mus Musculus)猫的气味对家鼠(小家鼠)生殖行为和生理的影响
9
Laboratory and field evaluation of predator odors as repellents for kiore (Rattus exulans) and ship rats (R. rattus).作为对小黑鼠(Rattus exulans)和黑家鼠(R. rattus)驱避剂的捕食者气味的实验室和野外评估
J Chem Ecol. 2001 May;27(5):1029-47. doi: 10.1023/a:1010399322861.
10
Experimental inoculation of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus), house mice (Mus musculus), and Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) with Mycobacterium bovis.用牛分枝杆菌对草原田鼠(宾夕法尼亚田鼠)、家鼠和褐家鼠进行实验接种。
J Wildl Dis. 2007 Jul;43(3):353-65. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-43.3.353.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographic Determinants of Residue Profiles of Fungicidal Compounds in Common Voles () under Semi-Natural and Natural Conditions.半自然和自然条件下常见田鼠体内杀真菌化合物残留特征的种群决定因素。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Apr 4;57(13):5180-5189. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00620. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Inhibitory Effects of Plant-Derived Sterilants on Rodent Population Abundance.植物源杀雄剂对啮齿动物种群丰度抑制作用的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Jul 15;14(7):487. doi: 10.3390/toxins14070487.
3
Small Animals, Big Impact? Early Farmers and Pre- and Post-Harvest Pests from the Middle Neolithic Site of Les Bagnoles in the South-East of France (L'Isle-sur-la-Sorgue, Vaucluse, Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur).
小动物,大影响?来自法国东南部新石器时代中期莱斯巴尼奥勒遗址(沃克吕兹省索尔格河畔伊勒,普罗旺斯-阿尔卑斯-蓝色海岸大区)的早期农民与收获前后的害虫
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 9;12(12):1511. doi: 10.3390/ani12121511.
4
Pine chemical volatiles promote dauer recovery of a pine parasitic nematode, .松脂化学挥发物促进松材线虫滞育的恢复。
Parasitology. 2020 Jan;147(1):50-57. doi: 10.1017/S0031182019001264. Epub 2019 Sep 17.