Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center, General Greene Avenue, Natick, MA 01760, United States.
Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2017 Jun;244:113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
Low molecular weight surfactants and high molecular weight block copolymers display analogous self-assembly behavior in solutions and at interfaces, generating nanoscale structures of different shapes. Understanding the link between the molecular structure of these amphiphiles and their self-assembly behavior has been the goal of theoretical studies. Despite the analogies between surfactants and block copolymers, models predicting their self-assembly behavior have evolved independent of one another, each overlooking the molecular feature considered critical to the other. In this review, we focus on the interplay of ideas pertaining to surfactants and block copolymers in three areas of self-assembly. First, we show how improved free energy models have evolved by applying ideas from surfactants to block copolymers and vice versa, giving rise to a unitary theoretical framework and better predictive capabilities for both classes of amphiphiles. Second we show that even though molecular packing arguments are often used to explain aggregate shape transitions resulting from self-assembly, the molecular packing considerations are more relevant in the case of surfactants whereas free energy criteria are relevant for block copolymers. Third, we show that even though the surfactant and block copolymer aggregates are small nanostructures, the size differences between them is significant enough to make the interfacial effects control the solubilization of molecules in surfactant micelles while the bulk interactions control the solubilization in block copolymer micelles. Finally, we conclude by identifying recent theoretical progress in adapting the micelle model to a wide variety of self-assembly phenomena and the challenges to modeling posed by emerging novel classes of amphiphiles with complex biological, inorganic or nanoparticle moieties.
低分子量表面活性剂和高分子量嵌段共聚物在溶液中和界面上表现出类似的自组装行为,生成不同形状的纳米级结构。理解这些两亲分子的分子结构与其自组装行为之间的联系一直是理论研究的目标。尽管表面活性剂和嵌段共聚物之间存在相似性,但预测它们自组装行为的模型是独立发展的,彼此忽略了对另一方至关重要的分子特征。在这篇综述中,我们关注与自组装三个方面相关的表面活性剂和嵌段共聚物思想的相互作用。首先,我们展示了如何通过将表面活性剂的思想应用于嵌段共聚物并反之亦然,来改进自由能模型,从而产生统一的理论框架,并提高这两类两亲分子的预测能力。其次,我们表明,尽管分子堆积参数通常用于解释自组装导致的聚集形状转变,但在表面活性剂的情况下,分子堆积考虑因素更为相关,而在嵌段共聚物的情况下,自由能标准更为相关。第三,我们表明,尽管表面活性剂和嵌段共聚物的聚集物是小的纳米结构,但它们之间的尺寸差异足以使界面效应控制分子在表面活性剂胶束中的溶解,而体相相互作用控制分子在嵌段共聚物胶束中的溶解。最后,我们通过确定最近在将胶束模型适应各种自组装现象方面的理论进展,以及对具有复杂生物、无机或纳米粒子部分的新型两亲分子进行建模所面临的挑战,得出结论。