Tan Mindy Y Q, Singhal Shaloo, Ma Henry, Chandra Ronil V, Cheong Jamie, Clissold Benjamin B, Ly John, Srikanth Velandai, Phan Thanh G
Stroke and Aging Research Group, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University , Melbourne, VIC , Australia.
Stroke and Aging Research Group, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Stroke Unit, Monash Medical Centre, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Front Neurol. 2016 Dec 5;7:220. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00220. eCollection 2016.
Lacunar infarct has been characterized as small subcortical infarct. It is postulated to occur from " microatheroma or lipohyalinosis" in small vessel or lacunar mechanism. Based on this idea, such infarcts by lacunar mechanism should not be associated with large area of perfusion deficits that extend beyond the subcortical region to the cortical region. By contrast, selected small subcortical infarcts, as defined by MR imaging in the subacute and chronic stage, may initially have large perfusion deficit or related large vessel occlusions. These infarcts with "lacunar" phenotype may also be caused by disease in the parent vessel and may have very different stroke mechanism from small vessel disease. Our aim is to describe differences in imaging characteristics between patients with small subcortical infarction with "lacunar phenotype" from those with lacunar mechanism.
Patients undergoing acute CT perfusion/angiography (CTP/CTA) within 6 h of symptom onset and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for ischemic stroke were included (2009-2013). Lacunar infarct was defined as a single subcortical infarct ≤20 mm on follow-up MRI. Presence of perfusion deficits, vessel occlusion, and infarct dimensions was compared between lacunar infarcts and other topographical infarct types.
Overall, 182 patients (mean age 66.4 ± 15.3 years, 66% males) were included. Lacunar infarct occurred in 31 (17%) patients. Of these, 12 (39%) patients had a perfusion deficit compared with those with any cortical infarction (120/142, 67%), and the smallest lacunar infarct with a perfusion deficit had a diameter of <5 mm. The majority of patients with lacunar infarction (8/12, 66.7%) had a relevant vessel occlusion. A quarter of lacunar infarcts had a large artery stroke mechanism evident on acute CTP/CTA. Lacunar mechanism was present in 3/8 patients with corona radiata, 5/10 lentiform nucleus, 5/6 posterior limb of internal capsule (PLIC), 3/5 thalamic infarcts, 1/2 miscellaneous locations. There was a trend to significant with regards to finding lacunar mechanism among patients with thalamic and PLIC infarcts versus lentiform nucleus and corona radiata infarcts ( = 0.13).
Diverse stroke mechanisms were present among subcortical infarcts in different locations. When available acute CTP/CTA should be combined with subacute imaging of subcortical infarct to separate "lacunar phenotype" from those with lacunar mechanism.
腔隙性梗死被定义为小的皮质下梗死。据推测,它是由小血管或腔隙机制中的“微动脉粥样硬化或脂质透明变性”引起的。基于这一观点,通过腔隙机制发生的此类梗死不应与超出皮质下区域延伸至皮质区域的大面积灌注缺损相关。相比之下,在亚急性和慢性期通过磁共振成像(MR成像)定义的特定小皮质下梗死,最初可能有较大的灌注缺损或相关的大血管闭塞。这些具有“腔隙性”表型的梗死也可能由母血管疾病引起,并且其卒中机制可能与小血管疾病有很大不同。我们的目的是描述具有“腔隙性表型”的小皮质下梗死患者与具有腔隙机制的患者在影像学特征上的差异。
纳入在症状发作6小时内接受急性CT灌注/血管造影(CTP/CTA)以及缺血性卒中随访磁共振成像(MRI)的患者(2009 - 2013年)。腔隙性梗死在随访MRI上被定义为单个皮质下梗死灶≤20毫米。比较腔隙性梗死与其他部位梗死类型之间灌注缺损、血管闭塞和梗死灶大小的情况。
总体上,纳入了182例患者(平均年龄66.4±15.3岁,66%为男性)。31例(17%)患者发生腔隙性梗死。其中,12例(39%)患者存在灌注缺损,而任何皮质梗死患者中存在灌注缺损的比例为120/142(67%),最小的有灌注缺损的腔隙性梗死灶直径<5毫米。大多数腔隙性梗死患者(8/12,66.7%)存在相关血管闭塞。四分之一的腔隙性梗死在急性CTP/CTA上有明显的大动脉卒中机制。在3/段放射冠梗死、5/10豆状核梗死、5/6内囊后肢(PLIC)梗死、3/5丘脑梗死、1/2其他部位梗死患者中存在腔隙机制。丘脑和PLIC梗死患者与豆状核和段放射冠梗死患者相比,发现腔隙机制有显著差异的趋势(P = 0.13)。
不同部位的皮质下梗死存在多种卒中机制。如有条件,急性CTP/CTA应与皮质下梗死的亚急性影像学检查相结合,以区分“腔隙性表型”与具有腔隙机制的梗死。