• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰体尾切除术后的短期结局:开腹手术与腹腔镜手术——单中心系列研究

Short-term outcomes after distal pancreatectomy: Laparotomy laparoscopy - A single-center series.

作者信息

Joliat Gaëtan-Romain, Demartines Nicolas, Halkic Nermin, Petermann David, Schäfer Markus

机构信息

Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Dec 5;13:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.12.001. eCollection 2017 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2016.12.001
PMID:27994871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5153441/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was introduced 15 years ago, but it is still not widely used. The aim of the study was to compare the postoperative complications and length of stay between open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of our institutional pancreas database was performed. All consecutive distal pancreatectomy patients from 2000 to 2015 were identified. Demographics, peri- and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. Postoperative complications were graded using Clavien classification. Standard statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred and five patients underwent distal pancreatectomy (45 women, 60 men, median age of 63 years). Seventy-nine cases were performed open and 26 by laparoscopy (conversion rate from laparoscopy to laparotomy: 7/26). Characteristics of both groups were similar. The tumor proportion was similar in both groups (56/79 and 23/26, p = 0.114). Overall complication rate was 41/79 (52%) in the open group and 9/26 (36%) in the laparoscopy group (p = 0.175). Two patients died during hospital stay in the open group compared to 0 in the laparoscopy group (p = 1). The fistula rates were comparable (17/79 and 5/26, p = 1). Median length of stay was shorter for the laparoscopy group (8 12 days, p < 0.001), as well as the median intermediate care stay (1 3 days, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Short-term outcomes after open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy regarding postoperative complications and mortality were similar, but length of stay was significantly shorter for the laparoscopic approach. Hence, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy should be offered to all suitable patients.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术于15年前开始应用,但仍未得到广泛使用。本研究的目的是比较开放手术与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的术后并发症及住院时间。

材料与方法

检索我们机构的胰腺数据库。确定了2000年至2015年所有连续行远端胰腺切除术的患者。回顾了人口统计学、围手术期和术后结果。术后并发症采用Clavien分类法分级。进行了标准的统计分析。

结果

105例患者接受了远端胰腺切除术(45例女性,60例男性,中位年龄63岁)。79例采用开放手术,26例采用腹腔镜手术(腹腔镜中转开腹率:7/26)。两组患者的特征相似。两组的肿瘤比例相似(56/79和23/26,p = 0.114)。开放手术组的总体并发症发生率为41/79(52%),腹腔镜手术组为9/26(36%)(p = 0.175)。开放手术组有2例患者在住院期间死亡,而腹腔镜手术组无死亡病例(p = 1)。瘘管发生率相当(17/79和5/26,p = 1)。腹腔镜手术组的中位住院时间较短(8 12天,p < 0.001),中位中级护理时间也较短(1 3天,p = 0.004)。

结论

开放手术与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术在术后并发症和死亡率方面的短期结果相似,但腹腔镜手术的住院时间明显较短。因此,应向所有合适的患者提供腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术。

相似文献

1
Short-term outcomes after distal pancreatectomy: Laparotomy laparoscopy - A single-center series.胰体尾切除术后的短期结局:开腹手术与腹腔镜手术——单中心系列研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Dec 5;13:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.12.001. eCollection 2017 Jan.
2
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺癌安全有效。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5633-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
3
Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study.腹腔镜在 70 岁以上需行胰体尾切除术患者中的应用:一项法国多中心对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3164-3173. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6033-3. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
[Comparison of short-term clinical outcome between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy].腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与开放远端胰腺切除术短期临床结局的比较
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 23;42(6):495-500. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20190627-00398.
5
Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Distal Pancreatectomy Using Propensity Score Analysis: A Real-world Retrospective Cohort Study.采用倾向评分分析的腹腔镜与开腹胰体尾切除术的短期疗效比较:一项真实世界回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Oct 1;278(4):e805-e811. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005758. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
Comparison of clinical outcomes and quality of life between laparoscopic and open central pancreatectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy.腹腔镜与开腹胰肠吻合中央胰腺切除术的临床结局和生活质量比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4756-4763. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5552-7. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
7
A prospective single institution comparison of peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术围手术期结局的前瞻性单机构比较。
Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):635-43; discussion 643-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.045.
8
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a large single-center study.腹腔镜与开腹胰体尾切除术治疗无功能性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤:一项大型单中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):443-449. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5702-y. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
9
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: A propensity score analysis in Japan.腹腔镜与开腹胰体尾切除术联合或不联合脾切除术的比较:日本的倾向评分分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Aug;104:106765. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106765. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
10
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes.机器人辅助与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术:短期结局的Meta分析
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0151189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151189. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌的肿瘤安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 4;9(1):1159. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37617-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Does the Introduction of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Jeopardize Patient Safety and Well-Being?腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的引入会危及患者的安全与福祉吗?
Scand J Surg. 2016 Dec;105(4):223-227. doi: 10.1177/1457496915626838. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
2
Pan-European survey on the implementation of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery with emphasis on cancer.泛欧洲微创胰腺手术实施情况调查,重点为癌症。
HPB (Oxford). 2016 Feb;18(2):170-176. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
3
Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery for benign and malignant disease.腹腔镜胰腺手术治疗良恶性疾病。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;13(4):227-38. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.17. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
4
Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺腺癌
World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1477-84. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3412-6.
5
LDP vs ODP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a case matched study from a single-institution.胰头十二指肠切除术(LDP)与保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术(ODP)治疗胰腺腺癌:一项来自单一机构的病例匹配研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 22;15:182. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0411-2.
6
The view from 10,000 procedures: technical tips and wisdom from master pancreatic surgeons to avoid hemorrhage during pancreaticoduodenectomy.万例手术视角:胰腺外科大师避免胰十二指肠切除术出血的技术要点与经验之谈
BMC Surg. 2015 Nov 25;15:122. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0109-y.
7
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Time for a Randomized Controlled Trial? Results of an All-inclusive National Observational Study.腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌:是时候进行随机对照试验了吗?一项全国性全面观察性研究的结果
Ann Surg. 2015 Nov;262(5):868-73; discussion 873-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001479.
8
Cost-benefit analysis of an enhanced recovery protocol for pancreaticoduodenectomy.胰十二指肠切除术强化康复方案的成本效益分析。
Br J Surg. 2015 Dec;102(13):1676-83. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9957. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
9
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: safe and reasonable?腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术治疗腺癌:安全且合理吗?
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Aug;6(4):406-17. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.034.
10
A Case-matched Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术的病例匹配对照研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Aug;25(4):363-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000179.