Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London , London, United Kingdom .
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Dec;18(12):806-812. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0146.
To report the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic variability (GV) indices, factors predictive of change, and to correlate variability with conventional markers of glycemia.
Data from the JDRF study of CGM in participants with type 1 diabetes were used. Participants were randomized to CGM or self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG). GV indices at baseline, at 26 weeks in both groups, and at 52 weeks in the control group were analyzed. The associations of demographic and clinical factors with change in GV indices from baseline to 26 weeks were evaluated.
Baseline data were available for 448 subjects. GV indices were all outside normative ranges (P < 0.001). Intercorrelation between GV indices was common and, apart from coefficient of variation (CV), low blood glucose index (LBGI), and percentage of glycemic risk assessment diabetes equation score attributable to hypoglycemia (%GRADE), all indices correlate positively with HbA1c. There was strong correlation between time spent in hypoglycemia, and CV, LBGI, and %GRADE, but not with HbA1c. A significant reduction in all GV indices, except lability index and mean absolute glucose change per unit time (MAG), was demonstrated in the intervention group at 26 weeks compared with the control group. Baseline factors predicting a change in GV with CGM include baseline HbA1c, baseline GV, frequency of daily SMBG, and insulin pump use.
CGM reduces most GV indices compared with SMBG in people with type 1 diabetes. The strong correlation between time spent in hypoglycemia and CV, LBGI, and %GRADE highlights the value of these metrics in assessing hypoglycemia as an adjunct to HbA1c in the overall assessment of glycemia.
报告连续血糖监测(CGM)对血糖变异性(GV)指标的影响、预测变化的因素,并将变异性与常规血糖标志物相关联。
使用 JDRF 关于 CGM 在 1 型糖尿病患者中应用的研究数据。参与者被随机分配到 CGM 或自我监测血糖(SMBG)组。分析两组基线时、26 周时和对照组 52 周时的 GV 指标。评估基线至 26 周时与 GV 指标变化相关的人口统计学和临床因素的相关性。
448 名受试者的基线数据可用。GV 指标均超出正常范围(P<0.001)。GV 指标之间相互关联,除变异系数(CV)、低血糖指数(LBGI)和低血糖评估糖尿病方程评分归因于低血糖的百分比(%GRADE)外,所有指标均与 HbA1c 呈正相关。低血糖时间与 CV、LBGI 和 %GRADE 呈强相关,但与 HbA1c 无关。与对照组相比,干预组在 26 周时所有 GV 指标均显著降低,除不稳定性指数和单位时间内平均绝对血糖变化(MAG)外。CGM 预测 GV 变化的基线因素包括基线 HbA1c、基线 GV、每日 SMBG 频率和胰岛素泵使用。
与 SMBG 相比,CGM 可降低 1 型糖尿病患者的大多数 GV 指标。低血糖时间与 CV、LBGI 和 %GRADE 之间的强相关性突出了这些指标在评估低血糖方面的价值,可作为 HbA1c 评估血糖的补充。