Ledogar Justin A, Benazzi Stefano, Smith Amanda L, Weber Gerhard W, Carlson Keely B, Dechow Paul C, Grosse Ian R, Ross Callum F, Richmond Brian G, Wright Barth W, Wang Qian, Byron Craig, Carlson Kristian J, De Ruiter Darryl J, Pryor Mcintosh Leslie C, Strait David S
Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.
Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, Albany, New York.
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017 Jan;300(1):171-195. doi: 10.1002/ar.23492.
Australopiths exhibit a number of derived facial features that are thought to strengthen the face against high and/or repetitive loads associated with a diet that included mechanically challenging foods. Here, we use finite element analysis (FEA) to test hypotheses related to the purported strengthening role of the zygomatic root and "anterior pillar" in australopiths. We modified our previously constructed models of Sts 5 (Australopithecus africanus) and MH1 (A. sediba) to differ in the morphology of the zygomatic root, including changes to both the shape and positioning of the zygomatic root complex, in addition to creating variants of Sts 5 lacking anterior pillars. We found that both an expanded zygomatic root and the presence of "anterior pillars" reinforce the face against feeding loads. We also found that strain orientations are most compatible with the hypothesis that the pillar evolved to resist loads associated with premolar loading, and that this morphology has an ancillary effect of strengthening the face during all loading regimes. These results provide support for the functional hypotheses. However, we found that an anteriorly positioned zygomatic root increases strain magnitudes even in models with an inflated/reinforced root complex. These results suggest that an anteriorly placed zygomatic root complex evolved to enhance the efficiency of bite force production while facial reinforcement features, such as the anterior pillar and the expanded zygomatic root, may have been selected for in part to compensate for the weakening effect of this facial configuration. Anat Rec, 300:171-195, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
南方古猿表现出许多特有的面部特征,这些特征被认为能增强面部抵御与包含机械性难处理食物的饮食相关的高强度和/或重复性负荷的能力。在此,我们使用有限元分析(FEA)来检验与南方古猿中颧骨根部和“前支柱”所谓的强化作用相关的假设。我们修改了之前构建的南方古猿非洲种(Sts 5)和南方古猿源泉种(MH1)的模型,使它们在颧骨根部形态上有所不同,包括颧骨根部复合体的形状和位置的变化,此外还创建了缺少前支柱的Sts 5变体。我们发现,扩大的颧骨根部和“前支柱”的存在都能增强面部抵御进食负荷的能力。我们还发现,应变方向与以下假设最为相符:支柱的进化是为了抵抗与前磨牙加载相关的负荷,并且这种形态在所有加载状态下都有增强面部的辅助作用。这些结果为功能假设提供了支持。然而,我们发现,即使在具有膨胀/强化根部复合体的模型中,向前定位的颧骨根部也会增加应变大小。这些结果表明,向前放置的颧骨根部复合体的进化是为了提高咬合力产生的效率,而面部强化特征,如前支柱和扩大的颧骨根部,可能部分是为了补偿这种面部结构的弱化效应而被选择的。《解剖学记录》,300:171 - 195,2017年。© 2016威利期刊公司。