Ledogar Justin A, Luk Theodora H Y, Perry Jonathan M G, Neaux Dimitri, Wroe Stephen
Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190689. eCollection 2018.
We analyzed feeding biomechanics in pitheciine monkeys (Pithecia, Chiropotes, Cacajao), a clade that specializes on hard-husked unripe fruit (sclerocarpy) and resistant seeds (seed predation). We tested the hypothesis that pitheciine crania are well-suited to generate and withstand forceful canine and molar biting, with the prediction that they generate bite forces more efficiently and better resist masticatory strains than the closely-related Callicebus, which does not specialize on unripe fruits and/or seeds. We also tested the hypothesis that Callicebus-Pithecia-Chiropotes-Cacajao represent a morphocline of increasing sclerocarpic specialization with respect to biting leverage and craniofacial strength, consistent with anterior dental morphology. We found that pitheciines have higher biting leverage than Callicebus and are generally more resistant to masticatory strain. However, Cacajao was found to experience high strain magnitudes in some facial regions. We therefore found limited support for the morphocline hypothesis, at least with respect to the mechanical performance metrics examined here. Biting leverage in Cacajao was nearly identical (or slightly less than) in Chiropotes and strain magnitudes during canine biting were more likely to follow a Cacajao-Chiropotes-Pithecia trend of increasing strength, in contrast to the proposed morphocline. These results could indicate that bite force efficiency and derived anterior teeth were selected for in pitheciines at the expense of increased strain magnitudes. However, our results for Cacajao potentially reflect reduced feeding competition offered by allopatry with other pitheciines, which allows Cacajao species to choose from a wider variety of fruits at various stages of ripeness, leading to reduction in the selection for robust facial features. We also found that feeding biomechanics in sympatric Pithecia and Chiropotes are consistent with data on food structural properties and observations of dietary niche separation, with the former being well-suited for the regular molar crushing of hard seeds and the latter better adapted for breaching hard fruits.
我们分析了伶猴属猴子(伶猴属、节尾猴属、秃猴属)的摄食生物力学,这一进化枝专门以硬壳未成熟果实(硬核化)和抗性种子(种子捕食)为食。我们检验了这样一个假设,即伶猴属的颅骨非常适合产生并承受有力的犬齿和臼齿咬合,预计它们比不专门以未成熟果实和/或种子为食的近缘物种——丛尾猴属,能更高效地产生咬合力,并更好地抵抗咀嚼应变。我们还检验了这样一个假设,即丛尾猴属 - 伶猴属 - 节尾猴属 - 秃猴属代表了一个在咬合力杠杆作用和颅面强度方面,硬核化专业化程度不断增加的形态渐变群,这与前牙形态一致。我们发现,伶猴属比丛尾猴属具有更高的咬合力杠杆作用,并且通常更能抵抗咀嚼应变。然而,我们发现秃猴属在某些面部区域承受着较高的应变幅度。因此,我们发现形态渐变群假设得到的支持有限,至少就此处所研究的力学性能指标而言是这样。秃猴属的咬合力杠杆作用与节尾猴属几乎相同(或略小于节尾猴属),并且在犬齿咬合时的应变幅度更有可能遵循秃猴属 - 节尾猴属 - 伶猴属强度增加的趋势,这与所提出的形态渐变群相反。这些结果可能表明,咬合力效率和特化的前牙是伶猴属所选择的特征,但代价是应变幅度增加。然而,我们关于秃猴属的结果可能反映出,与其他伶猴属物种异域分布所带来的摄食竞争减少,这使得秃猴属物种能够从各种成熟阶段的更广泛水果种类中进行选择,从而导致对强健面部特征的选择减少。我们还发现,同域分布的伶猴属和节尾猴属的摄食生物力学与食物结构特性数据以及饮食生态位分离的观察结果一致,前者非常适合对硬种子进行常规的臼齿碾碎,而后者更适合咬开硬果实。