Savini Giacomo, Næser Kristian, Schiano-Lomoriello Domenico, Ducoli Pietro
*Fondazione G.B. Bietti, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; and †Department of Ophthalmology, Regions Hospital Randers, Randers, Denmark.
Cornea. 2017 Apr;36(4):463-469. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001117.
To investigate agreement between rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR, Oculus) and rotating Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido disc corneal topography (Sirius, CSO) in measuring total corneal astigmatism (TCA).
In this observational study, all patients undergoing cataract surgery with preoperative measurement of TCA by both devices and a validated corneal topographer (Keratron, Optikon 2000) were retrospectively evaluated. Astigmatism analysis was performed with and without vector analysis separately in eyes with with-the-rule, against-the-rule, and oblique astigmatism. Vector analysis was performed using the Næser polar system.
In 130 eyes of 130 subjects, nonvectorial analysis revealed that the mean TCA values obtained with the Sirius were higher than the corresponding values given by the Pentacam HR in all subgroups, although the difference was statistically significant only in eyes with against-the-rule astigmatism (P = 0.0009). This finding was confirmed by vector analysis. A TCA magnitude difference greater than 0.5 diopters was observed in 20.8% of cases, and a TCA axis difference greater than 10 degrees was observed in 45.4% of cases. Axis differences dropped to 18.5% when only eyes with astigmatism >0.75 diopters were analyzed and 3 measurements were averaged. The mean difference in the meridional and torsional power of TCA was close to zero in all subgroups, but with relatively large standard deviations (approximately 0.5 D).
Agreement between both devices in measuring TCA is only moderate with respect to both magnitude and axis orientation.
研究旋转式眼前节分析系统(Pentacam HR,Oculus公司)与旋转式眼前节分析系统联合角膜表面规则性分析仪(Sirius,CSO公司)在测量总角膜散光(TCA)方面的一致性。
在这项观察性研究中,对所有接受白内障手术且术前使用这两种设备及经过验证的角膜地形图仪(Keratron,Optikon 2000公司)测量TCA的患者进行回顾性评估。分别对顺规散光、逆规散光和斜向散光眼进行有向量分析和无向量分析的散光分析。向量分析采用Næser极坐标系统。
在130名受试者的130只眼中,非向量分析显示,Sirius测得的平均TCA值在所有亚组中均高于Pentacam HR测得的相应值,尽管仅在逆规散光眼中差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.0009)。这一发现通过向量分析得到证实。在20.8%的病例中观察到TCA量值差异大于0.5屈光度,在45.4%的病例中观察到TCA轴差异大于10度。当仅分析散光>0.75屈光度的眼睛并对3次测量结果进行平均时,轴差异降至18.5%。在所有亚组中,TCA子午线和扭转力量的平均差异接近零,但标准差相对较大(约0.5 D)。
两种设备在测量TCA的量值和轴位方向方面的一致性仅为中等。