Lee Eun-Young, Kim Joo-Young, Lee Deuk-Ki, Yoon Il-Sub, Ko Hae Li, Chung Ji-Woo, Chang Jun, Nam Jae-Hwan
Department of Biotechnology, Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, 420-743.
Division of Life & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Women's University, Seoul 120-750, Korea.
Microbiol Immunol. 2016 Dec;60(12):846-853. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12458.
The Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is the leading cause of viral encephalitis. Although there are four classes of vaccines against JEV, all of them are administered by s.c or i.m injection. Here, the effectiveness of sublingual (s.l.) administration of a JEV live-attenuated vaccine or recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) vaccine, including JEV prM/E, was investigated. The mice were immunized three times i.m. or s.c. One week after the final immunization by both s.l. and i.m. routes, the titers of IgG1 induced by the recombinant MVA vaccine were higher than those induced by the live-attenuated vaccine, whereas the titers of IgG2a induced by the live-attenuated vaccine were higher than those induced by the recombinant MVA vaccine. However, both vaccines induced neutralizing antibodies when given by either s.l. or i.m. routes, indicating that both vaccines induce appropriate Th1 and Th2 cell responses through the s.l. and i.m. routes. Moreover, both vaccines protected against induction of proinflammatory cytokines and focal spleen white pulp hyperplasia after viral challenge. Virus-specific IFN-γ CD4 and CD8 T cells appeared to increase in mice immunized via both s.l. and i.m. routes. Interestingly, virus-specific IL-17 CD4 T cells increased significantly only in the mice immunized via the s.l. route; however, the increased IL-17 did not affect pathogenicity after viral challenge. These results suggest that s.l. immunization may be as useful as i.m. injection for induction of protective immune responses against JEV by both live-attenuated and recombinant MVA vaccines.
日本脑炎病毒(JEV)是病毒性脑炎的主要病因。尽管有四类针对JEV的疫苗,但所有疫苗均通过皮下或肌肉注射给药。在此,研究了经舌下(s.l.)接种JEV减毒活疫苗或重组改良安卡拉痘苗病毒(MVA)疫苗(包括JEV prM/E)的有效性。小鼠通过肌肉注射或皮下注射免疫三次。在通过舌下和肌肉注射途径进行最后一次免疫后一周,重组MVA疫苗诱导的IgG1滴度高于减毒活疫苗诱导的滴度,而减毒活疫苗诱导的IgG2a滴度高于重组MVA疫苗诱导的滴度。然而,两种疫苗通过舌下或肌肉注射途径给药时均诱导产生中和抗体,这表明两种疫苗均可通过舌下和肌肉注射途径诱导适当的Th1和Th2细胞反应。此外,两种疫苗在病毒攻击后均能防止促炎细胞因子的诱导和脾脏白髓局灶性增生。病毒特异性IFN-γ CD4和CD8 T细胞似乎在通过舌下和肌肉注射途径免疫的小鼠中均有所增加。有趣的是,病毒特异性IL-17 CD4 T细胞仅在通过舌下途径免疫的小鼠中显著增加;然而,增加的IL-17在病毒攻击后并未影响致病性。这些结果表明,对于减毒活疫苗和重组MVA疫苗诱导针对JEV的保护性免疫反应,舌下免疫可能与肌肉注射一样有效。