Izumi Betty T, Eckhardt Cara L, Wilson Dara P, Cahill Jennifer
Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon, 506 SW Mill St, Portland, OR 97201. Email:
Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Dec 22;13:E174. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160259.
Cooking interventions may improve diet quality. Most cooking interventions are delivered in group settings. Home visiting programs may be an appropriate mechanism for delivering such interventions to low-income families with young children. We conducted a pilot study to test the feasibility of using a cooking intervention delivered by home visitors to improve attitudes and behaviors related to vegetable consumption by low-income parents with children enrolled in a home visiting program.
We invited 121 parents with children enrolled in an Early Head Start Home Visiting program in Portland, Oregon, to participate. During 2013-2014, each month for 8 months, home visitors (n = 14) implemented 1 cooking activity plus 1 complementary activity focused on 12 vegetables. We collected pre- and post-intervention data on participants' cooking confidence and whether they tried and liked the selected vegetables. We also measured fidelity to protocol and home visitors' perception of intervention usability.
Of 104 participants, 58 provided pre- and post-intervention data. We observed a significant increase in confidence in baking, roasting or grilling vegetables; cooking 6 of 10 vegetables; and trying 7 of 12 vegetables. Nearly all respondents participated in the monthly cooking activity (96%) and complementary activity (94%). Twelve of 14 home visitors reported that the intervention was acceptable, feasible, and easy to understand, and needed systems supports to implement.
Cooking interventions may be a feasible approach to improving attitudes and behaviors related to vegetable consumption by low-income families with young children. Additional research is needed to assess the impact of such interventions on vegetable consumption.
烹饪干预可能会改善饮食质量。大多数烹饪干预是在团体环境中进行的。家访项目可能是向有幼儿的低收入家庭提供此类干预的合适机制。我们进行了一项试点研究,以测试由家访人员提供烹饪干预,从而改善参加家访项目的低收入家长与蔬菜消费相关的态度和行为的可行性。
我们邀请了俄勒冈州波特兰市121名有孩子参加早期启蒙家访项目的家长参与。在2013年至2014年期间,家访人员(n = 14)连续8个月,每月开展1次烹饪活动以及1次围绕12种蔬菜的补充活动。我们收集了干预前后参与者烹饪信心的数据,以及他们是否尝试并喜欢所选蔬菜的数据。我们还评估了对方案的依从性以及家访人员对干预可用性的看法。
104名参与者中,58人提供了干预前后的数据。我们观察到,在烘焙、烤制或烧烤蔬菜方面的信心显著增加;烹饪10种蔬菜中的6种;尝试12种蔬菜中的7种。几乎所有受访者都参加了月度烹饪活动(96%)和补充活动(94%)。14名家访人员中有12人报告称,该干预是可接受且可行的,易于理解,并且实施时需要系统支持。
烹饪干预可能是改善有幼儿的低收入家庭与蔬菜消费相关的态度和行为的一种可行方法。需要进一步研究来评估此类干预对蔬菜消费的影响。